带薪家庭假和减少婴幼儿急性呼吸道感染:每个人都能平等受益吗?

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Katherine A Ahrens, Jennifer A Hutcheon, Erin C Strumpf, Arijit Nandi, Justin R Ortiz, Teresa Janevic
{"title":"带薪家庭假和减少婴幼儿急性呼吸道感染:每个人都能平等受益吗?","authors":"Katherine A Ahrens, Jennifer A Hutcheon, Erin C Strumpf, Arijit Nandi, Justin R Ortiz, Teresa Janevic","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>To examine whether the effect of a paid family leave program on acute care encounters for respiratory tract infections (RTI) among young infants differed by subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined 52943 hospitalizations and emergency department visits between Oct 2015 and Feb 2020 among infants aged ≤8 weeks in New York, which introduced paid family leave in January 2018, and four New England control states (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine). We conducted a controlled time series analysis that compared observed counts in New York during the putative respiratory virus season (Oct-Mar) in each population subgroup to those predicted in the absence of the policy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Absolute reductions in RTI-related acute care encounters among young infants were greater for Hispanic as compared to non-Hispanic white infants (5.60 fewer cases per 1000 infants [95% CI: -8.74 to -2.51]) and for encounters paid for by Medicaid as compared to private payer (4.22 fewer cases per 1000 [95% CI: -6.45, -2.18]). Findings by Child Opportunity Index 2.0 quintiles showed no clear pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest the program may have larger benefits for infants from less advantaged groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paid family leave and reduced acute respiratory infections in young infants: Does everyone benefit equally?\",\"authors\":\"Katherine A Ahrens, Jennifer A Hutcheon, Erin C Strumpf, Arijit Nandi, Justin R Ortiz, Teresa Janevic\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aje/kwaf124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>To examine whether the effect of a paid family leave program on acute care encounters for respiratory tract infections (RTI) among young infants differed by subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined 52943 hospitalizations and emergency department visits between Oct 2015 and Feb 2020 among infants aged ≤8 weeks in New York, which introduced paid family leave in January 2018, and four New England control states (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine). We conducted a controlled time series analysis that compared observed counts in New York during the putative respiratory virus season (Oct-Mar) in each population subgroup to those predicted in the absence of the policy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Absolute reductions in RTI-related acute care encounters among young infants were greater for Hispanic as compared to non-Hispanic white infants (5.60 fewer cases per 1000 infants [95% CI: -8.74 to -2.51]) and for encounters paid for by Medicaid as compared to private payer (4.22 fewer cases per 1000 [95% CI: -6.45, -2.18]). Findings by Child Opportunity Index 2.0 quintiles showed no clear pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest the program may have larger benefits for infants from less advantaged groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf124\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:研究带薪家庭假计划对婴幼儿呼吸道感染(RTI)急性护理的影响是否因亚组而异。方法:我们调查了2015年10月至2020年2月期间纽约(2018年1月引入带薪家庭假)和四个新英格兰对照州(马萨诸塞州、新罕布什尔州、佛蒙特州、缅因州)≤8周婴儿的52943例住院和急诊就诊情况。我们进行了一项对照时间序列分析,将纽约在假定的呼吸道病毒季节(10月至3月)每个人群亚组的观察计数与没有该政策时的预测计数进行了比较。结果:与非西班牙裔白人婴儿相比,西班牙裔婴儿中与rti相关的急性护理就诊的绝对减少幅度更大(每1000名婴儿减少5.60例[95% CI: -8.74至-2.51]),与私人支付者相比,由医疗补助支付的就诊(每1000名婴儿减少4.22例[95% CI: -6.45, -2.18])。儿童机会指数2.0五分位数的调查结果没有明显的规律。结论:我们的研究结果表明,该计划可能对来自弱势群体的婴儿有更大的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paid family leave and reduced acute respiratory infections in young infants: Does everyone benefit equally?

Background and objectives: To examine whether the effect of a paid family leave program on acute care encounters for respiratory tract infections (RTI) among young infants differed by subgroups.

Methods: We examined 52943 hospitalizations and emergency department visits between Oct 2015 and Feb 2020 among infants aged ≤8 weeks in New York, which introduced paid family leave in January 2018, and four New England control states (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine). We conducted a controlled time series analysis that compared observed counts in New York during the putative respiratory virus season (Oct-Mar) in each population subgroup to those predicted in the absence of the policy.

Results: Absolute reductions in RTI-related acute care encounters among young infants were greater for Hispanic as compared to non-Hispanic white infants (5.60 fewer cases per 1000 infants [95% CI: -8.74 to -2.51]) and for encounters paid for by Medicaid as compared to private payer (4.22 fewer cases per 1000 [95% CI: -6.45, -2.18]). Findings by Child Opportunity Index 2.0 quintiles showed no clear pattern.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest the program may have larger benefits for infants from less advantaged groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信