Katherine A Ahrens, Jennifer A Hutcheon, Erin C Strumpf, Arijit Nandi, Justin R Ortiz, Teresa Janevic
{"title":"带薪家庭假和减少婴幼儿急性呼吸道感染:每个人都能平等受益吗?","authors":"Katherine A Ahrens, Jennifer A Hutcheon, Erin C Strumpf, Arijit Nandi, Justin R Ortiz, Teresa Janevic","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>To examine whether the effect of a paid family leave program on acute care encounters for respiratory tract infections (RTI) among young infants differed by subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined 52943 hospitalizations and emergency department visits between Oct 2015 and Feb 2020 among infants aged ≤8 weeks in New York, which introduced paid family leave in January 2018, and four New England control states (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine). We conducted a controlled time series analysis that compared observed counts in New York during the putative respiratory virus season (Oct-Mar) in each population subgroup to those predicted in the absence of the policy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Absolute reductions in RTI-related acute care encounters among young infants were greater for Hispanic as compared to non-Hispanic white infants (5.60 fewer cases per 1000 infants [95% CI: -8.74 to -2.51]) and for encounters paid for by Medicaid as compared to private payer (4.22 fewer cases per 1000 [95% CI: -6.45, -2.18]). Findings by Child Opportunity Index 2.0 quintiles showed no clear pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest the program may have larger benefits for infants from less advantaged groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paid family leave and reduced acute respiratory infections in young infants: Does everyone benefit equally?\",\"authors\":\"Katherine A Ahrens, Jennifer A Hutcheon, Erin C Strumpf, Arijit Nandi, Justin R Ortiz, Teresa Janevic\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aje/kwaf124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>To examine whether the effect of a paid family leave program on acute care encounters for respiratory tract infections (RTI) among young infants differed by subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined 52943 hospitalizations and emergency department visits between Oct 2015 and Feb 2020 among infants aged ≤8 weeks in New York, which introduced paid family leave in January 2018, and four New England control states (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine). We conducted a controlled time series analysis that compared observed counts in New York during the putative respiratory virus season (Oct-Mar) in each population subgroup to those predicted in the absence of the policy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Absolute reductions in RTI-related acute care encounters among young infants were greater for Hispanic as compared to non-Hispanic white infants (5.60 fewer cases per 1000 infants [95% CI: -8.74 to -2.51]) and for encounters paid for by Medicaid as compared to private payer (4.22 fewer cases per 1000 [95% CI: -6.45, -2.18]). Findings by Child Opportunity Index 2.0 quintiles showed no clear pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest the program may have larger benefits for infants from less advantaged groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf124\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Paid family leave and reduced acute respiratory infections in young infants: Does everyone benefit equally?
Background and objectives: To examine whether the effect of a paid family leave program on acute care encounters for respiratory tract infections (RTI) among young infants differed by subgroups.
Methods: We examined 52943 hospitalizations and emergency department visits between Oct 2015 and Feb 2020 among infants aged ≤8 weeks in New York, which introduced paid family leave in January 2018, and four New England control states (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine). We conducted a controlled time series analysis that compared observed counts in New York during the putative respiratory virus season (Oct-Mar) in each population subgroup to those predicted in the absence of the policy.
Results: Absolute reductions in RTI-related acute care encounters among young infants were greater for Hispanic as compared to non-Hispanic white infants (5.60 fewer cases per 1000 infants [95% CI: -8.74 to -2.51]) and for encounters paid for by Medicaid as compared to private payer (4.22 fewer cases per 1000 [95% CI: -6.45, -2.18]). Findings by Child Opportunity Index 2.0 quintiles showed no clear pattern.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest the program may have larger benefits for infants from less advantaged groups.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research.
It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.