改进社会接触研究在流行病建模中的应用。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-13 DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001876
Tom Britton, Frank Ball
{"title":"改进社会接触研究在流行病建模中的应用。","authors":"Tom Britton, Frank Ball","doi":"10.1097/EDE.0000000000001876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social contact studies are used in infectious disease epidemiology to infer a contact matrix , having the mean number of contacts between individuals of different age groups as elements. However, does not capture the (often large) variation in the number of contacts within each age group, information is also available in social contact studies. Here, we include such variation by separating each age group into two halves: the socially active (having many contacts) and the socially less active (having fewer contacts). The extended contact matrix and its associated epidemic model show that acknowledging variation in social activity within age groups has a substantial impact on the basic reproduction number, , and the final fraction getting infected if the epidemic takes off, . In fact, variation in social activity is more important for data fitting than allowing for different age groups. A difficulty with variation in social activity, however, is that social contact studies typically lack information on whether mixing with respect to social activity is assortative (when socially active mainly have contact with other socially active individuals) or not. Our analysis shows that accounting for variation in social activity improves model predictability, yielding more accurate expressions for and irrespective of whether such mixing is assortative, but different assumptions on assortativity give rather different outputs. Future social contact studies should, therefore, also try to infer the degree of assortativity (with respect to social activity) between peers and their contacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11779,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"660-667"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Use of Social Contact Studies in Epidemic Modeling.\",\"authors\":\"Tom Britton, Frank Ball\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EDE.0000000000001876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Social contact studies are used in infectious disease epidemiology to infer a contact matrix , having the mean number of contacts between individuals of different age groups as elements. However, does not capture the (often large) variation in the number of contacts within each age group, information is also available in social contact studies. Here, we include such variation by separating each age group into two halves: the socially active (having many contacts) and the socially less active (having fewer contacts). The extended contact matrix and its associated epidemic model show that acknowledging variation in social activity within age groups has a substantial impact on the basic reproduction number, , and the final fraction getting infected if the epidemic takes off, . In fact, variation in social activity is more important for data fitting than allowing for different age groups. A difficulty with variation in social activity, however, is that social contact studies typically lack information on whether mixing with respect to social activity is assortative (when socially active mainly have contact with other socially active individuals) or not. Our analysis shows that accounting for variation in social activity improves model predictability, yielding more accurate expressions for and irrespective of whether such mixing is assortative, but different assumptions on assortativity give rather different outputs. Future social contact studies should, therefore, also try to infer the degree of assortativity (with respect to social activity) between peers and their contacts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"660-667\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303244/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001876\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001876","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会接触研究在传染病流行病学中用于推断接触矩阵,以不同年龄组个人之间的平均接触次数为要素。然而,并没有捕捉到(通常很大的)在每个年龄组的接触数量的变化,信息也可在社会接触研究。在这里,我们通过将每个年龄组分为两半来考虑这种变化:社交活跃(有很多联系)和社交不活跃(接触较少)。扩展接触矩阵及其相关的流行病模型表明,承认年龄组内社会活动的差异对基本繁殖数和流行病爆发时感染的最终比例有重大影响。事实上,对于数据拟合而言,社会活动的变化比考虑不同年龄组更为重要。然而,社会活动变化的一个困难是,社会接触研究通常缺乏关于社会活动的混合是否属于分类(当社会活跃主要与其他社会活跃个体接触时)的信息。我们的分析表明,考虑社会活动的变化可以提高模型的可预测性,无论这种混合是否属于分类性,都能产生更准确的表达,但对分类性的不同假设会产生相当不同的输出。因此,未来的社会接触研究也应该尝试推断同伴和他们的联系人之间的分类程度(就社会活动而言)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the Use of Social Contact Studies in Epidemic Modeling.

Social contact studies are used in infectious disease epidemiology to infer a contact matrix , having the mean number of contacts between individuals of different age groups as elements. However, does not capture the (often large) variation in the number of contacts within each age group, information is also available in social contact studies. Here, we include such variation by separating each age group into two halves: the socially active (having many contacts) and the socially less active (having fewer contacts). The extended contact matrix and its associated epidemic model show that acknowledging variation in social activity within age groups has a substantial impact on the basic reproduction number, , and the final fraction getting infected if the epidemic takes off, . In fact, variation in social activity is more important for data fitting than allowing for different age groups. A difficulty with variation in social activity, however, is that social contact studies typically lack information on whether mixing with respect to social activity is assortative (when socially active mainly have contact with other socially active individuals) or not. Our analysis shows that accounting for variation in social activity improves model predictability, yielding more accurate expressions for and irrespective of whether such mixing is assortative, but different assumptions on assortativity give rather different outputs. Future social contact studies should, therefore, also try to infer the degree of assortativity (with respect to social activity) between peers and their contacts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiology
Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
177
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology publishes original research from all fields of epidemiology. The journal also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, novel hypotheses, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信