{"title":"三种不同美学修复材料抗压强度的体外分析。","authors":"Rohit Nagar, Simone Grandini, Carlo Gaeta, Sumit Dubey, Niladri Maiti, Madhura Avinash Jadhav, Neerieza Konthoujam","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1884_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aims to assess and contrast the compressive strengths of three aesthetically pleasing restorative materials.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using metallic molds, 30 pellets were created, then split into 3 groups of 10, each meeting the required specifications. Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) cylindrical specimens are in Group A; Resin Modified GIC (RMGIC) cylindrical specimens are in Group B; and Zirconomer cylindrical specimens are in Group C. A universal testing equipment was used to compress all of the samples, and the results were acquired. Tukey's <i>post hoc</i> test and one-way ANOVA were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Zirconomer's compressive strength is significantly higher than that of RMGIC and GIC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The compressive strength of Zirconomer is the highest. As a result, Zirconomer may be the preferred material for aesthetic restorative procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"17 Suppl 1","pages":"S391-S393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12156493/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>In Vitro</i> Analysis of Compressive Strength of Three Different Aesthetic Restorative Materials.\",\"authors\":\"Rohit Nagar, Simone Grandini, Carlo Gaeta, Sumit Dubey, Niladri Maiti, Madhura Avinash Jadhav, Neerieza Konthoujam\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1884_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aims to assess and contrast the compressive strengths of three aesthetically pleasing restorative materials.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using metallic molds, 30 pellets were created, then split into 3 groups of 10, each meeting the required specifications. Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) cylindrical specimens are in Group A; Resin Modified GIC (RMGIC) cylindrical specimens are in Group B; and Zirconomer cylindrical specimens are in Group C. A universal testing equipment was used to compress all of the samples, and the results were acquired. Tukey's <i>post hoc</i> test and one-way ANOVA were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Zirconomer's compressive strength is significantly higher than that of RMGIC and GIC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The compressive strength of Zirconomer is the highest. As a result, Zirconomer may be the preferred material for aesthetic restorative procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences\",\"volume\":\"17 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"S391-S393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12156493/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1884_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1884_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
In Vitro Analysis of Compressive Strength of Three Different Aesthetic Restorative Materials.
Aim: The study aims to assess and contrast the compressive strengths of three aesthetically pleasing restorative materials.
Materials and methods: Using metallic molds, 30 pellets were created, then split into 3 groups of 10, each meeting the required specifications. Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) cylindrical specimens are in Group A; Resin Modified GIC (RMGIC) cylindrical specimens are in Group B; and Zirconomer cylindrical specimens are in Group C. A universal testing equipment was used to compress all of the samples, and the results were acquired. Tukey's post hoc test and one-way ANOVA were used for statistical analysis.
Result: Zirconomer's compressive strength is significantly higher than that of RMGIC and GIC.
Conclusion: The compressive strength of Zirconomer is the highest. As a result, Zirconomer may be the preferred material for aesthetic restorative procedures.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
