酒精干预心脏病学的可行性:瑞典临床医生观点的混合方法研究。

Paul Welfordsson, Anna-Karin Danielsson, Caroline Björck, Bartosz Grzymala-Lubanski, Kristina Hambraeus, Ida Haugen Löfman, Olga Nilsson, Frieder Braunschweig, Matthias Lidin, Sara Wallhed Finn
{"title":"酒精干预心脏病学的可行性:瑞典临床医生观点的混合方法研究。","authors":"Paul Welfordsson, Anna-Karin Danielsson, Caroline Björck, Bartosz Grzymala-Lubanski, Kristina Hambraeus, Ida Haugen Löfman, Olga Nilsson, Frieder Braunschweig, Matthias Lidin, Sara Wallhed Finn","doi":"10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to explore clinicians' perspectives on the feasibility of implementing alcohol screening and brief interventions (SBI) in cardiology services.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We conducted a multi-site, exploratory-sequential mixed methods study. Themes from qualitative interviews were integrated with the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation (COM-B) framework during the design and analysis of a cross-sectional survey of cardiology clinicians across Sweden. We assessed perceived capability, opportunities, motivation, and overall perceived feasibility for SBI, and explored associations using ordinal logistic regression. Among 638 participants (mean age=43 years, 75% women), median perceived feasibility was 66.7%; Motivation for SBI was highest (68.8%), followed by perceived opportunities (66.6%) and capability (62.5%). Perceived feasibility was higher among doctors (OR=2.67, 95%CI=1.38-5.13) compared to assistant nurses and among outpatient clinicians (OR=1.75, 95%CI=1.14-2.70) compared to inpatient staff. Participants with specialist experience in arrhythmia (OR=1.82, 95%CI=1.01-3.28) and heart failure (OR=1.95, 95%CI=1.14-3.33) perceived SBI as particularly feasible. Integrated analysis indicated that clinicians perceive universal alcohol screening as important, and that opportunities for SBI exist in cardiology. Implementation barriers may include low competence with brief interventions and doubts about the reliability of self-reported alcohol use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that the perceived feasibility of SBI varies according to clinicians' professional backgrounds and the clinical context. Doctors, outpatient staff, and those with specialist experience tended to perceive SBI as feasible and may be important stakeholders for implementation in cardiology. Effective strategies may include task sharing with assistant nurses and adapting training to clinical competencies and professional independence.</p>","PeriodicalId":93997,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of alcohol interventions in cardiology: a mixed methods study of clinician perspectives in Sweden.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Welfordsson, Anna-Karin Danielsson, Caroline Björck, Bartosz Grzymala-Lubanski, Kristina Hambraeus, Ida Haugen Löfman, Olga Nilsson, Frieder Braunschweig, Matthias Lidin, Sara Wallhed Finn\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to explore clinicians' perspectives on the feasibility of implementing alcohol screening and brief interventions (SBI) in cardiology services.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We conducted a multi-site, exploratory-sequential mixed methods study. Themes from qualitative interviews were integrated with the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation (COM-B) framework during the design and analysis of a cross-sectional survey of cardiology clinicians across Sweden. We assessed perceived capability, opportunities, motivation, and overall perceived feasibility for SBI, and explored associations using ordinal logistic regression. Among 638 participants (mean age=43 years, 75% women), median perceived feasibility was 66.7%; Motivation for SBI was highest (68.8%), followed by perceived opportunities (66.6%) and capability (62.5%). Perceived feasibility was higher among doctors (OR=2.67, 95%CI=1.38-5.13) compared to assistant nurses and among outpatient clinicians (OR=1.75, 95%CI=1.14-2.70) compared to inpatient staff. Participants with specialist experience in arrhythmia (OR=1.82, 95%CI=1.01-3.28) and heart failure (OR=1.95, 95%CI=1.14-3.33) perceived SBI as particularly feasible. Integrated analysis indicated that clinicians perceive universal alcohol screening as important, and that opportunities for SBI exist in cardiology. Implementation barriers may include low competence with brief interventions and doubts about the reliability of self-reported alcohol use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that the perceived feasibility of SBI varies according to clinicians' professional backgrounds and the clinical context. Doctors, outpatient staff, and those with specialist experience tended to perceive SBI as feasible and may be important stakeholders for implementation in cardiology. Effective strategies may include task sharing with assistant nurses and adapting training to clinical competencies and professional independence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of cardiovascular nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of cardiovascular nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨临床医生对在心脏病学服务中实施酒精筛查和短暂干预(SBI)的可行性的看法。方法和结果:我们进行了一项多地点、探索性-顺序混合方法研究。在设计和分析瑞典心脏病学临床医生的横断面调查期间,定性访谈的主题与能力、机会、动机(COM-B)框架相结合。我们评估了感知能力、机会、动机和SBI的整体感知可行性,并使用有序逻辑回归探讨了相关关系。在638名参与者中(平均年龄43岁,75%为女性),中位感知可行性为66.7%;对SBI的动机最高(68.8%),其次是感知机会(66.6%)和能力(62.5%)。与助理护士相比,医生(OR=2.67, 95%CI=1.38-5.13)和门诊临床医生(OR=1.75, 95%CI=1.14-2.70)的感知可行性更高。在心律失常(OR=1.82, 95%CI=1.01-3.28)和心力衰竭(OR=1.95, 95%CI=1.14-3.33)方面有专业经验的参与者认为SBI特别可行。综合分析表明,临床医生认为普遍的酒精筛查是重要的,并且在心脏病学中存在SBI的机会。实施障碍可能包括短期干预的能力低下和对自我报告酒精使用的可靠性的怀疑。结论:研究结果表明,临床医生的专业背景和临床环境不同,对SBI的感知可行性存在差异。医生、门诊人员和那些有专业经验的人倾向于认为SBI是可行的,并且可能是在心脏病学中实施的重要利益相关者。有效的策略可能包括与助理护士分担任务,并使培训适应临床能力和专业独立性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of alcohol interventions in cardiology: a mixed methods study of clinician perspectives in Sweden.

Aim: This study aimed to explore clinicians' perspectives on the feasibility of implementing alcohol screening and brief interventions (SBI) in cardiology services.

Methods and results: We conducted a multi-site, exploratory-sequential mixed methods study. Themes from qualitative interviews were integrated with the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation (COM-B) framework during the design and analysis of a cross-sectional survey of cardiology clinicians across Sweden. We assessed perceived capability, opportunities, motivation, and overall perceived feasibility for SBI, and explored associations using ordinal logistic regression. Among 638 participants (mean age=43 years, 75% women), median perceived feasibility was 66.7%; Motivation for SBI was highest (68.8%), followed by perceived opportunities (66.6%) and capability (62.5%). Perceived feasibility was higher among doctors (OR=2.67, 95%CI=1.38-5.13) compared to assistant nurses and among outpatient clinicians (OR=1.75, 95%CI=1.14-2.70) compared to inpatient staff. Participants with specialist experience in arrhythmia (OR=1.82, 95%CI=1.01-3.28) and heart failure (OR=1.95, 95%CI=1.14-3.33) perceived SBI as particularly feasible. Integrated analysis indicated that clinicians perceive universal alcohol screening as important, and that opportunities for SBI exist in cardiology. Implementation barriers may include low competence with brief interventions and doubts about the reliability of self-reported alcohol use.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that the perceived feasibility of SBI varies according to clinicians' professional backgrounds and the clinical context. Doctors, outpatient staff, and those with specialist experience tended to perceive SBI as feasible and may be important stakeholders for implementation in cardiology. Effective strategies may include task sharing with assistant nurses and adapting training to clinical competencies and professional independence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信