食管贲门失弛缓症的计算机辅助检测(附视频)。

Hironari Shiwaku, Masashi Misawa, Haruhiro Inoue, Kai Jiang, Masahiro Oda, Pietro Familiari, Guido Costamagna, Yuto Shimamura, Yuichiro Ikebuchi, Yugo Iwaya, Masaki Ominami, Bu'Hussain Hayee, Khek-Yu Ho, Jimmy B Y So, Hein Myat Thu Htet, Pradeep Bhandari, Kevin Grimes, Helmut Messmann, Bianca Maria Quarta Colosso, Roberta Maselli, Cesare Hassan, Alessandro Repici, Stavros N Stavropoulos, Norio Fukami, Robert Bechara, Michel Kahaleh, Amrita Sethi, Torsten Beyna, Horst Neuhaus, Philip W Y Chiu, Esperanza Grace Santi, Prateek Sharma, Nikolas Eleftheriadis, Hitomi Minami, Gregory Haber, Peter V Draganov, Stefan Seewald, Akio Shiwaku, Yoshiyuki Shiwaku, Kensaku Mori, Shin-Ei Kudo, Suguru Hasegawa
{"title":"食管贲门失弛缓症的计算机辅助检测(附视频)。","authors":"Hironari Shiwaku, Masashi Misawa, Haruhiro Inoue, Kai Jiang, Masahiro Oda, Pietro Familiari, Guido Costamagna, Yuto Shimamura, Yuichiro Ikebuchi, Yugo Iwaya, Masaki Ominami, Bu'Hussain Hayee, Khek-Yu Ho, Jimmy B Y So, Hein Myat Thu Htet, Pradeep Bhandari, Kevin Grimes, Helmut Messmann, Bianca Maria Quarta Colosso, Roberta Maselli, Cesare Hassan, Alessandro Repici, Stavros N Stavropoulos, Norio Fukami, Robert Bechara, Michel Kahaleh, Amrita Sethi, Torsten Beyna, Horst Neuhaus, Philip W Y Chiu, Esperanza Grace Santi, Prateek Sharma, Nikolas Eleftheriadis, Hitomi Minami, Gregory Haber, Peter V Draganov, Stefan Seewald, Akio Shiwaku, Yoshiyuki Shiwaku, Kensaku Mori, Shin-Ei Kudo, Suguru Hasegawa","doi":"10.1111/den.15028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder that impairs quality of life and is often missed (20-50%) on endoscopy. A newly developed computer-aided detection (CAD) software has shown high accuracy for achalasia diagnosis in preclinical settings. However, its benefit in a clinical setting remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between February and August 2023, 83 endoscopists from 27 centers assessed 50 randomized endoscopic videos (25 achalasia, 25 nonachalasia) without and with CAD. Endoscopists assessed videos without CAD, then with CAD after 2 months. The primary end-point was improvement in sensitivity for nonexperienced endoscopists (no endoscopic experience of achalasia). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with and without CAD were compared using the McNemar test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitivity for diagnosing achalasia increased significantly with CAD, rising from 74.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.2-76.0%) to 91.2% (95% CI 89.9-92.4%) for all readers, showing a difference of 17.1% (95% CI 15.1-19.0%). Specifically, sensitivity improved from 66.9% (95% CI 63.6-70.0%) to 91.9% (95% CI 89.9-93.6%) among nonexperienced endoscopists, resulting in a difference of 25.0% (95% CI 21.7-28.4%), and from 79.5% (95% CI 77.1-81.8%) to 90.8% (95% CI 89.0-92.3%) among experienced endoscopists (endoscopic experience of at least one achalasia case), with a difference of 11.3% (95% CI 8.9-13.6%). Accuracy and specificity improved significantly with CAD assistance, regardless of reader's experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CAD improves achalasia detection by 17%, confirming preclinical results. The benefit was higher for nonexperienced endoscopists. CAD assistance may lead to prompt and effective treatment, minimizing the risk of false-negative diagnosis in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/) number: UMIN000053047.</p>","PeriodicalId":72813,"journal":{"name":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computer-aided detection for esophageal achalasia (with video).\",\"authors\":\"Hironari Shiwaku, Masashi Misawa, Haruhiro Inoue, Kai Jiang, Masahiro Oda, Pietro Familiari, Guido Costamagna, Yuto Shimamura, Yuichiro Ikebuchi, Yugo Iwaya, Masaki Ominami, Bu'Hussain Hayee, Khek-Yu Ho, Jimmy B Y So, Hein Myat Thu Htet, Pradeep Bhandari, Kevin Grimes, Helmut Messmann, Bianca Maria Quarta Colosso, Roberta Maselli, Cesare Hassan, Alessandro Repici, Stavros N Stavropoulos, Norio Fukami, Robert Bechara, Michel Kahaleh, Amrita Sethi, Torsten Beyna, Horst Neuhaus, Philip W Y Chiu, Esperanza Grace Santi, Prateek Sharma, Nikolas Eleftheriadis, Hitomi Minami, Gregory Haber, Peter V Draganov, Stefan Seewald, Akio Shiwaku, Yoshiyuki Shiwaku, Kensaku Mori, Shin-Ei Kudo, Suguru Hasegawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/den.15028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder that impairs quality of life and is often missed (20-50%) on endoscopy. A newly developed computer-aided detection (CAD) software has shown high accuracy for achalasia diagnosis in preclinical settings. However, its benefit in a clinical setting remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between February and August 2023, 83 endoscopists from 27 centers assessed 50 randomized endoscopic videos (25 achalasia, 25 nonachalasia) without and with CAD. Endoscopists assessed videos without CAD, then with CAD after 2 months. The primary end-point was improvement in sensitivity for nonexperienced endoscopists (no endoscopic experience of achalasia). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with and without CAD were compared using the McNemar test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitivity for diagnosing achalasia increased significantly with CAD, rising from 74.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.2-76.0%) to 91.2% (95% CI 89.9-92.4%) for all readers, showing a difference of 17.1% (95% CI 15.1-19.0%). Specifically, sensitivity improved from 66.9% (95% CI 63.6-70.0%) to 91.9% (95% CI 89.9-93.6%) among nonexperienced endoscopists, resulting in a difference of 25.0% (95% CI 21.7-28.4%), and from 79.5% (95% CI 77.1-81.8%) to 90.8% (95% CI 89.0-92.3%) among experienced endoscopists (endoscopic experience of at least one achalasia case), with a difference of 11.3% (95% CI 8.9-13.6%). Accuracy and specificity improved significantly with CAD assistance, regardless of reader's experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CAD improves achalasia detection by 17%, confirming preclinical results. The benefit was higher for nonexperienced endoscopists. CAD assistance may lead to prompt and effective treatment, minimizing the risk of false-negative diagnosis in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/) number: UMIN000053047.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.15028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.15028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:贲门失弛缓症是一种食道运动障碍,影响生活质量,内镜检查经常漏诊(20-50%)。一种新开发的计算机辅助检测(CAD)软件显示出在临床前诊断贲门失弛缓症的高精度。然而,它在临床环境中的益处尚不清楚。方法:在2023年2月至8月期间,来自27个中心的83名内窥镜医师评估了50个随机的内窥镜视频(25个贲门失弛缓症,25个非贲门失弛缓症),没有和有CAD。内窥镜医生在没有CAD的情况下评估视频,然后在2个月后使用CAD。主要终点是无内窥镜经验的医师(无贲门失弛缓症内窥镜经验)敏感性的提高。使用McNemar试验比较有无CAD的敏感性、特异性和准确性。结果:CAD对贲门失弛缓症的诊断敏感性显著提高,所有读者从74.2%(95%可信区间[CI] 72.2-76.0%)上升至91.2% (95% CI 899 -92.4%),差异为17.1% (95% CI 15.1-19.0%)。具体来说,在没有经验的内窥镜医师中,敏感度从66.9% (95% CI 63.6-70.0%)提高到91.9% (95% CI 89.9-93.6%),差异为25.0% (95% CI 21.7-28.4%);在有经验的内窥镜医师(至少有一个失弛缓症病例的内窥镜经验)中,敏感度从79.5% (95% CI 77.1-81.8%)提高到90.8% (95% CI 89.0-92.3%),差异为11.3% (95% CI 8.9-13.6%)。在CAD辅助下,无论读者的经验如何,准确性和特异性都得到了显著提高。结论:CAD使贲门失弛缓症的检出率提高了17%,证实了临床前的结果。对于没有经验的内窥镜医师来说,获益更高。CAD辅助可能导致及时有效的治疗,在临床实践中最大限度地减少假阴性诊断的风险。试验注册:本研究已在大学医院医学信息网临床试验注册中心(https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/)注册,编号:UMIN000053047。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computer-aided detection for esophageal achalasia (with video).

Objectives: Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder that impairs quality of life and is often missed (20-50%) on endoscopy. A newly developed computer-aided detection (CAD) software has shown high accuracy for achalasia diagnosis in preclinical settings. However, its benefit in a clinical setting remains unclear.

Methods: Between February and August 2023, 83 endoscopists from 27 centers assessed 50 randomized endoscopic videos (25 achalasia, 25 nonachalasia) without and with CAD. Endoscopists assessed videos without CAD, then with CAD after 2 months. The primary end-point was improvement in sensitivity for nonexperienced endoscopists (no endoscopic experience of achalasia). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with and without CAD were compared using the McNemar test.

Results: Sensitivity for diagnosing achalasia increased significantly with CAD, rising from 74.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.2-76.0%) to 91.2% (95% CI 89.9-92.4%) for all readers, showing a difference of 17.1% (95% CI 15.1-19.0%). Specifically, sensitivity improved from 66.9% (95% CI 63.6-70.0%) to 91.9% (95% CI 89.9-93.6%) among nonexperienced endoscopists, resulting in a difference of 25.0% (95% CI 21.7-28.4%), and from 79.5% (95% CI 77.1-81.8%) to 90.8% (95% CI 89.0-92.3%) among experienced endoscopists (endoscopic experience of at least one achalasia case), with a difference of 11.3% (95% CI 8.9-13.6%). Accuracy and specificity improved significantly with CAD assistance, regardless of reader's experience.

Conclusion: CAD improves achalasia detection by 17%, confirming preclinical results. The benefit was higher for nonexperienced endoscopists. CAD assistance may lead to prompt and effective treatment, minimizing the risk of false-negative diagnosis in clinical practice.

Trial registration: This study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/) number: UMIN000053047.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信