比较同时使用酒精和大麻的场合相对于只使用酒精或大麻的场合的主观影响和中毒。

IF 2.7 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Ashley N Linden-Carmichael, Shou-Chun Chiang, Walter Dyer, Sandesh Bhandari, Stephanie T Lanza
{"title":"比较同时使用酒精和大麻的场合相对于只使用酒精或大麻的场合的主观影响和中毒。","authors":"Ashley N Linden-Carmichael, Shou-Chun Chiang, Walter Dyer, Sandesh Bhandari, Stephanie T Lanza","doi":"10.1111/acer.70101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simultaneous use of alcohol and cannabis-or use of both substances so effects overlap-is common among college-attending young adults and can heighten one's likelihood of experiencing substance-related harms in daily life. Limited ecological momentary assessment and daily diary work have examined the role of subjective intoxication and subjective effects when engaging in simultaneous relative to alcohol- or cannabis-only use, and studies have yielded mixed results. As such, subjective experiences serve as important internal cues for decision making; this study aimed to examine the level of subjective intoxication and effects across simultaneous, alcohol-only, and cannabis-only occasions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 119 college students aged 18-25 who reported weekly simultaneous use at baseline. Participants enrolled in a 4-week ecological momentary assessment study with up to eight prompts per day collected on weekend days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multilevel models revealed that relative to alcohol- and cannabis-only days, simultaneous use days were not significantly associated with subjective alcohol or cannabis intoxication, respectively. Peak levels of subjective alcohol effects were, however, significantly stronger during simultaneous use occasions relative to alcohol-only use occasions. Subjective cannabis effects were not significantly different between simultaneous and cannabis-only use days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study findings suggest that \"adding\" cannabis to an alcohol use occasion may bolster subjective effects such as feeling clumsy, confused, and having difficulty concentrating. Findings also highlight that subjective effects, rather than degree of impairment/intoxication, more strongly differentiates alcohol and simultaneous use occasions, and may serve as a useful momentary intervention target in future work.</p>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing subjective effects and intoxication on simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use occasions relative to alcohol- or cannabis-only occasions.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley N Linden-Carmichael, Shou-Chun Chiang, Walter Dyer, Sandesh Bhandari, Stephanie T Lanza\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acer.70101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simultaneous use of alcohol and cannabis-or use of both substances so effects overlap-is common among college-attending young adults and can heighten one's likelihood of experiencing substance-related harms in daily life. Limited ecological momentary assessment and daily diary work have examined the role of subjective intoxication and subjective effects when engaging in simultaneous relative to alcohol- or cannabis-only use, and studies have yielded mixed results. As such, subjective experiences serve as important internal cues for decision making; this study aimed to examine the level of subjective intoxication and effects across simultaneous, alcohol-only, and cannabis-only occasions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 119 college students aged 18-25 who reported weekly simultaneous use at baseline. Participants enrolled in a 4-week ecological momentary assessment study with up to eight prompts per day collected on weekend days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multilevel models revealed that relative to alcohol- and cannabis-only days, simultaneous use days were not significantly associated with subjective alcohol or cannabis intoxication, respectively. Peak levels of subjective alcohol effects were, however, significantly stronger during simultaneous use occasions relative to alcohol-only use occasions. Subjective cannabis effects were not significantly different between simultaneous and cannabis-only use days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Study findings suggest that \\\"adding\\\" cannabis to an alcohol use occasion may bolster subjective effects such as feeling clumsy, confused, and having difficulty concentrating. Findings also highlight that subjective effects, rather than degree of impairment/intoxication, more strongly differentiates alcohol and simultaneous use occasions, and may serve as a useful momentary intervention target in future work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.70101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.70101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:同时使用酒精和大麻-或使用这两种物质的影响重叠-在上大学的年轻人中很常见,并且可以增加一个人在日常生活中经历物质相关危害的可能性。有限的生态瞬间评估和日常日记工作已经研究了主观中毒和主观影响在同时从事相对于酒精或大麻使用时的作用,研究得出了不同的结果。因此,主观体验是决策的重要内部线索;这项研究的目的是检查主观中毒的水平和影响在同时,酒精和大麻仅场合。方法:参与者为119名年龄在18-25岁的大学生,他们在基线时报告每周同时使用。参与者参加了为期4周的生态瞬间评估研究,在周末每天收集多达8个提示。结果:多水平模型显示,相对于酒精和大麻,同时使用天数分别与主观酒精或大麻中毒无关。然而,在同时使用酒精的情况下,主观酒精效应的峰值水平明显强于只使用酒精的情况。主观大麻效应在同时使用和仅使用大麻的日子之间没有显着差异。结论:研究结果表明,在饮酒时“添加”大麻可能会增强主观影响,如感觉笨拙、困惑和难以集中注意力。研究结果还强调,主观效应,而不是损伤/中毒程度,更能区分酒精和同时使用的场合,并可能在未来的工作中作为有用的瞬间干预目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing subjective effects and intoxication on simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use occasions relative to alcohol- or cannabis-only occasions.

Background: Simultaneous use of alcohol and cannabis-or use of both substances so effects overlap-is common among college-attending young adults and can heighten one's likelihood of experiencing substance-related harms in daily life. Limited ecological momentary assessment and daily diary work have examined the role of subjective intoxication and subjective effects when engaging in simultaneous relative to alcohol- or cannabis-only use, and studies have yielded mixed results. As such, subjective experiences serve as important internal cues for decision making; this study aimed to examine the level of subjective intoxication and effects across simultaneous, alcohol-only, and cannabis-only occasions.

Methods: Participants were 119 college students aged 18-25 who reported weekly simultaneous use at baseline. Participants enrolled in a 4-week ecological momentary assessment study with up to eight prompts per day collected on weekend days.

Results: Multilevel models revealed that relative to alcohol- and cannabis-only days, simultaneous use days were not significantly associated with subjective alcohol or cannabis intoxication, respectively. Peak levels of subjective alcohol effects were, however, significantly stronger during simultaneous use occasions relative to alcohol-only use occasions. Subjective cannabis effects were not significantly different between simultaneous and cannabis-only use days.

Conclusions: Study findings suggest that "adding" cannabis to an alcohol use occasion may bolster subjective effects such as feeling clumsy, confused, and having difficulty concentrating. Findings also highlight that subjective effects, rather than degree of impairment/intoxication, more strongly differentiates alcohol and simultaneous use occasions, and may serve as a useful momentary intervention target in future work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信