71例腘绳肌损伤患者自述损伤机制与MRI结果的关系

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Sylvain Grange, Gustaaf Reurink, Pierre Croisille, Pascal Edouard
{"title":"71例腘绳肌损伤患者自述损伤机制与MRI结果的关系","authors":"Sylvain Grange, Gustaaf Reurink, Pierre Croisille, Pascal Edouard","doi":"10.1177/19417381251343070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hamstring muscle injury (HMI) is the most common injury in sports that require sprints and accelerations. Different HMI subtypes have been described according to the muscle, location, tissue, and severity of the injury. It is of interest to determine whether these subtypes are related to a particular clinical injury mechanism.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>There would be an association between the muscle involved and the injury mechanism.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients underwent postinjury magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and were assessed for their mechanism of injury using a survey. Statistical analyses used chi squared test and analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 71 patients were included in the present study. MRI scans were performed within 7.5 ± 4.9 days of injury. There was no significant association between the HMI mechanism and the injured muscle (χ<sup>2</sup> = 6.86; <i>P</i> = 0.34), or with proximo-distal position (χ<sup>2</sup> = 20.28; <i>P</i> = 0.16). There was a significant association between HMI mechanism and HMI grade (χ<sup>2</sup> = 23.7; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and the HMI volume (F(3,67) = 5.223; <i>P</i> = 0.003) with significant higher severity and higher volume in stretching than in running mechanisms (<i>P</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We showed an association between HMI mechanism and MRI scan grade and volume, with significant higher injury grade and larger volume in stretching mechanism.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>These differences, depending on the mechanism of injury, may lead to changes in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":" ","pages":"19417381251343070"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship Between Patients' Self-Reported Injury Mechanism and MRI Outcomes in Hamstring Muscle Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study on 71 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Sylvain Grange, Gustaaf Reurink, Pierre Croisille, Pascal Edouard\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19417381251343070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hamstring muscle injury (HMI) is the most common injury in sports that require sprints and accelerations. Different HMI subtypes have been described according to the muscle, location, tissue, and severity of the injury. It is of interest to determine whether these subtypes are related to a particular clinical injury mechanism.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>There would be an association between the muscle involved and the injury mechanism.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients underwent postinjury magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and were assessed for their mechanism of injury using a survey. Statistical analyses used chi squared test and analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 71 patients were included in the present study. MRI scans were performed within 7.5 ± 4.9 days of injury. There was no significant association between the HMI mechanism and the injured muscle (χ<sup>2</sup> = 6.86; <i>P</i> = 0.34), or with proximo-distal position (χ<sup>2</sup> = 20.28; <i>P</i> = 0.16). There was a significant association between HMI mechanism and HMI grade (χ<sup>2</sup> = 23.7; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and the HMI volume (F(3,67) = 5.223; <i>P</i> = 0.003) with significant higher severity and higher volume in stretching than in running mechanisms (<i>P</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We showed an association between HMI mechanism and MRI scan grade and volume, with significant higher injury grade and larger volume in stretching mechanism.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>These differences, depending on the mechanism of injury, may lead to changes in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19417381251343070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165957/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381251343070\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381251343070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腿筋肌肉损伤(HMI)是需要冲刺和加速的运动中最常见的损伤。根据损伤的肌肉、部位、组织和严重程度,描述了不同的HMI亚型。确定这些亚型是否与特定的临床损伤机制有关是一个有趣的问题。假设:在涉及的肌肉和损伤机制之间存在关联。研究设计:前瞻性、多中心、观察性队列研究。证据等级:三级。方法:所有患者均行损伤后磁共振成像(MRI)检查,并通过调查评估其损伤机制。统计分析采用卡方检验和方差分析。结果:本研究共纳入71例患者。损伤后7.5±4.9天内进行MRI扫描。HMI机制与损伤肌肉无显著相关性(χ2 = 6.86;P = 0.34),或与近端-远端位置(χ2 = 20.28;P = 0.16)。HMI机制与HMI分级有显著相关(χ2 = 23.7;P < 0.001), HMI体积(F(3,67) = 5.223;P = 0.003),拉伸的严重程度和体积明显高于运行机构(P = 0.002)。结论:HMI机制与MRI扫描分级和体积相关,其中拉伸机制损伤等级高、体积大。临床相关性:这些差异,取决于损伤的机制,可能导致临床实践的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship Between Patients' Self-Reported Injury Mechanism and MRI Outcomes in Hamstring Muscle Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study on 71 Patients.

Background: Hamstring muscle injury (HMI) is the most common injury in sports that require sprints and accelerations. Different HMI subtypes have been described according to the muscle, location, tissue, and severity of the injury. It is of interest to determine whether these subtypes are related to a particular clinical injury mechanism.

Hypothesis: There would be an association between the muscle involved and the injury mechanism.

Study design: Prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study.

Level of evidence: Level 3.

Methods: All patients underwent postinjury magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and were assessed for their mechanism of injury using a survey. Statistical analyses used chi squared test and analysis of variance.

Results: A total of 71 patients were included in the present study. MRI scans were performed within 7.5 ± 4.9 days of injury. There was no significant association between the HMI mechanism and the injured muscle (χ2 = 6.86; P = 0.34), or with proximo-distal position (χ2 = 20.28; P = 0.16). There was a significant association between HMI mechanism and HMI grade (χ2 = 23.7; P < 0.001) and the HMI volume (F(3,67) = 5.223; P = 0.003) with significant higher severity and higher volume in stretching than in running mechanisms (P = 0.002).

Conclusion: We showed an association between HMI mechanism and MRI scan grade and volume, with significant higher injury grade and larger volume in stretching mechanism.

Clinical relevance: These differences, depending on the mechanism of injury, may lead to changes in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信