公共卫生中的系统方法:超越绘制原因。

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Loes Crielaard, Mary Nicolaou, Andrew D Brown, S Coosje Dijkstra, Fleur Ter Ellen, Leonie K Elsenburg, Angie Luna Pinzon, Wilma E Waterlander, Karien Stronks
{"title":"公共卫生中的系统方法:超越绘制原因。","authors":"Loes Crielaard, Mary Nicolaou, Andrew D Brown, S Coosje Dijkstra, Fleur Ter Ellen, Leonie K Elsenburg, Angie Luna Pinzon, Wilma E Waterlander, Karien Stronks","doi":"10.1186/s12966-025-01766-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systems approaches are increasingly adopted in public health, commonly operationalised using system dynamics (SD). In public health, systems approaches have prioritised understanding the current system by describing the causes of a complex problem - e.g. obesity - as a system. It remains challenging to advance from understanding the current system producing undesired outcomes, towards responses to improve outcomes. Rather than creating models of the (entire) system, SD traditionally emphasises specific models to support policy development. While core concepts from SD have effectively been adopted in public health, there may be more to learn from SD when it comes to designing systems approaches that can fulfil the purpose of informing problem responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed seminal SD literature for clues on how to refine the focus of systems approaches, so that they lead to specific models supporting policy development. We conducted a narrative review, seeking a strategy that can be leveraged in systems approaches in public health. We concentrated on SD's problem framing strategy, leading to two insights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Insight 1: Alongside the complex problem at stake (e.g. obesity), consider the intended result of the systems approach (coordination, learning, analysis or transformation). This helps recognise which system components are relevant to problem responses and make methodological decisions accordingly. Insight 2: If investigation of the current system reveals that only radical change can lead to improved outcomes, then proceed to envisioning how the system could be fundamentally transformed to support those desired outcomes. This next step helps to anticipate policy resistance, unintended consequences and counterintuitive behaviour by contemplating how the system would react due to proposed problem responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Applying a problem framing strategy, as is commonly done in SD, could make systems approaches in public health better positioned to inform problem responses. Problem framing stimulates the contribution of systems approaches to health policy, prioritising system components relevant to problem responses (Insight 1), which may not be part of the system (Insight 2).</p>","PeriodicalId":50336,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","volume":"22 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systems approaches in public health: beyond mapping the causes.\",\"authors\":\"Loes Crielaard, Mary Nicolaou, Andrew D Brown, S Coosje Dijkstra, Fleur Ter Ellen, Leonie K Elsenburg, Angie Luna Pinzon, Wilma E Waterlander, Karien Stronks\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12966-025-01766-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systems approaches are increasingly adopted in public health, commonly operationalised using system dynamics (SD). In public health, systems approaches have prioritised understanding the current system by describing the causes of a complex problem - e.g. obesity - as a system. It remains challenging to advance from understanding the current system producing undesired outcomes, towards responses to improve outcomes. Rather than creating models of the (entire) system, SD traditionally emphasises specific models to support policy development. While core concepts from SD have effectively been adopted in public health, there may be more to learn from SD when it comes to designing systems approaches that can fulfil the purpose of informing problem responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed seminal SD literature for clues on how to refine the focus of systems approaches, so that they lead to specific models supporting policy development. We conducted a narrative review, seeking a strategy that can be leveraged in systems approaches in public health. We concentrated on SD's problem framing strategy, leading to two insights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Insight 1: Alongside the complex problem at stake (e.g. obesity), consider the intended result of the systems approach (coordination, learning, analysis or transformation). This helps recognise which system components are relevant to problem responses and make methodological decisions accordingly. Insight 2: If investigation of the current system reveals that only radical change can lead to improved outcomes, then proceed to envisioning how the system could be fundamentally transformed to support those desired outcomes. This next step helps to anticipate policy resistance, unintended consequences and counterintuitive behaviour by contemplating how the system would react due to proposed problem responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Applying a problem framing strategy, as is commonly done in SD, could make systems approaches in public health better positioned to inform problem responses. Problem framing stimulates the contribution of systems approaches to health policy, prioritising system components relevant to problem responses (Insight 1), which may not be part of the system (Insight 2).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164216/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-025-01766-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-025-01766-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:公共卫生越来越多地采用系统方法,通常使用系统动力学(SD)进行操作。在公共卫生领域,系统方法通过将复杂问题(如肥胖)的原因描述为一个系统来优先理解当前系统。从了解当前系统产生的不良结果,到采取措施改善结果,仍然具有挑战性。与创建(整个)系统的模型不同,可持续发展传统上强调支持政策制定的特定模型。虽然可持续发展战略的核心概念已被有效地应用于公共卫生领域,但在设计能够实现为问题应对提供信息的系统方法方面,可持续发展战略可能有更多可借鉴之处。方法:我们回顾了开创性的可持续发展文献,以寻找如何细化系统方法的重点的线索,从而得出支持政策制定的具体模型。我们进行了一项叙述性审查,寻求一种可用于公共卫生系统方法的战略。我们专注于SD的问题框架策略,得出了两个见解。洞察1:除了面临的复杂问题(如肥胖),还要考虑系统方法的预期结果(协调、学习、分析或转化)。这有助于识别哪些系统组件与问题响应相关,并据此做出方法学决策。见解2:如果对当前系统的调查表明,只有彻底的改变才能导致改善的结果,那么就开始设想如何从根本上改变系统以支持这些预期的结果。下一步,通过考虑系统将如何对提出的问题作出反应,有助于预测政策阻力、意外后果和违反直觉的行为。结论:应用问题框架策略,正如在可持续发展中通常所做的那样,可以使公共卫生系统方法更好地定位于告知问题响应。问题框架促进系统方法对卫生政策的贡献,优先考虑与问题响应相关的系统组件(见解1),这些组件可能不是系统的一部分(见解2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systems approaches in public health: beyond mapping the causes.

Background: Systems approaches are increasingly adopted in public health, commonly operationalised using system dynamics (SD). In public health, systems approaches have prioritised understanding the current system by describing the causes of a complex problem - e.g. obesity - as a system. It remains challenging to advance from understanding the current system producing undesired outcomes, towards responses to improve outcomes. Rather than creating models of the (entire) system, SD traditionally emphasises specific models to support policy development. While core concepts from SD have effectively been adopted in public health, there may be more to learn from SD when it comes to designing systems approaches that can fulfil the purpose of informing problem responses.

Methods: We reviewed seminal SD literature for clues on how to refine the focus of systems approaches, so that they lead to specific models supporting policy development. We conducted a narrative review, seeking a strategy that can be leveraged in systems approaches in public health. We concentrated on SD's problem framing strategy, leading to two insights.

Results: Insight 1: Alongside the complex problem at stake (e.g. obesity), consider the intended result of the systems approach (coordination, learning, analysis or transformation). This helps recognise which system components are relevant to problem responses and make methodological decisions accordingly. Insight 2: If investigation of the current system reveals that only radical change can lead to improved outcomes, then proceed to envisioning how the system could be fundamentally transformed to support those desired outcomes. This next step helps to anticipate policy resistance, unintended consequences and counterintuitive behaviour by contemplating how the system would react due to proposed problem responses.

Conclusions: Applying a problem framing strategy, as is commonly done in SD, could make systems approaches in public health better positioned to inform problem responses. Problem framing stimulates the contribution of systems approaches to health policy, prioritising system components relevant to problem responses (Insight 1), which may not be part of the system (Insight 2).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
138
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (IJBNPA) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. IJBNPA is devoted to furthering the understanding of the behavioral aspects of diet and physical activity and is unique in its inclusion of multiple levels of analysis, including populations, groups and individuals and its inclusion of epidemiology, and behavioral, theoretical and measurement research areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信