Melinda M Franettovich Smith, Wolbert van den Hoorn, Adele van den Hoek, Graham Kerr, Sheree E Hurn
{"title":"鞋履设计对女性足底后跟疼痛的鞋内压力、冲击力和舒适度的直接影响。","authors":"Melinda M Franettovich Smith, Wolbert van den Hoorn, Adele van den Hoek, Graham Kerr, Sheree E Hurn","doi":"10.1002/jfa2.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Footwear is often recommended in the management of plantar heel pain (PHP), theoretically to reduce tissue stress during standing and walking; however, limited data exist to guide footwear design and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Plantar pressures, impact forces and comfort during walking were recorded in 29 women with PHP (mean age 47 ± 12 years) in six randomised shoe and insert conditions. A test shoe (polyurethane outsole, 14-mm heel-toe pitch) was compared to a control shoe (rubber outsole, 4-mm heel-toe pitch), and within the test shoe, five different insoles that varied by material, density and arch contouring were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The test shoe reduced heel peak pressure (15%, p < 0.01) and reduced the loading rate but not the peak magnitude of the vertical ground reaction force (average loading rate reduction: 7%, p < 0.01; maximum loading rate: 29%, p < 0.01) and was more comfortable (47%-67%, p < 0.01) compared to the control shoe. Within the test shoe, dual-density inserts with arch contouring showed lower heel peak pressure compared to a lightweight flat insert (11%-12%, p < 0.03). The insert with the firmest material and higher arch contouring showed higher midfoot peak pressure (16%-21%, p < 0.01) compared to other inserts. Forefoot peak pressure did not differ between shoe or insert conditions (p > 0.05). There were no differences in impact forces or comfort between the different inserts within the test shoe (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that shoe and insert properties are both important and provide data to guide footwear design and management recommendations for PHP.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":"18 2","pages":"e70055"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immediate Effects of Footwear Design on In-Shoe Plantar Pressures, Impact Forces and Comfort in Women With Plantar Heel Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Melinda M Franettovich Smith, Wolbert van den Hoorn, Adele van den Hoek, Graham Kerr, Sheree E Hurn\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jfa2.70055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Footwear is often recommended in the management of plantar heel pain (PHP), theoretically to reduce tissue stress during standing and walking; however, limited data exist to guide footwear design and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Plantar pressures, impact forces and comfort during walking were recorded in 29 women with PHP (mean age 47 ± 12 years) in six randomised shoe and insert conditions. A test shoe (polyurethane outsole, 14-mm heel-toe pitch) was compared to a control shoe (rubber outsole, 4-mm heel-toe pitch), and within the test shoe, five different insoles that varied by material, density and arch contouring were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The test shoe reduced heel peak pressure (15%, p < 0.01) and reduced the loading rate but not the peak magnitude of the vertical ground reaction force (average loading rate reduction: 7%, p < 0.01; maximum loading rate: 29%, p < 0.01) and was more comfortable (47%-67%, p < 0.01) compared to the control shoe. Within the test shoe, dual-density inserts with arch contouring showed lower heel peak pressure compared to a lightweight flat insert (11%-12%, p < 0.03). The insert with the firmest material and higher arch contouring showed higher midfoot peak pressure (16%-21%, p < 0.01) compared to other inserts. Forefoot peak pressure did not differ between shoe or insert conditions (p > 0.05). There were no differences in impact forces or comfort between the different inserts within the test shoe (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that shoe and insert properties are both important and provide data to guide footwear design and management recommendations for PHP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"e70055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163246/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70055\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Immediate Effects of Footwear Design on In-Shoe Plantar Pressures, Impact Forces and Comfort in Women With Plantar Heel Pain.
Background: Footwear is often recommended in the management of plantar heel pain (PHP), theoretically to reduce tissue stress during standing and walking; however, limited data exist to guide footwear design and recommendations.
Methods: Plantar pressures, impact forces and comfort during walking were recorded in 29 women with PHP (mean age 47 ± 12 years) in six randomised shoe and insert conditions. A test shoe (polyurethane outsole, 14-mm heel-toe pitch) was compared to a control shoe (rubber outsole, 4-mm heel-toe pitch), and within the test shoe, five different insoles that varied by material, density and arch contouring were also compared.
Results: The test shoe reduced heel peak pressure (15%, p < 0.01) and reduced the loading rate but not the peak magnitude of the vertical ground reaction force (average loading rate reduction: 7%, p < 0.01; maximum loading rate: 29%, p < 0.01) and was more comfortable (47%-67%, p < 0.01) compared to the control shoe. Within the test shoe, dual-density inserts with arch contouring showed lower heel peak pressure compared to a lightweight flat insert (11%-12%, p < 0.03). The insert with the firmest material and higher arch contouring showed higher midfoot peak pressure (16%-21%, p < 0.01) compared to other inserts. Forefoot peak pressure did not differ between shoe or insert conditions (p > 0.05). There were no differences in impact forces or comfort between the different inserts within the test shoe (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Findings suggest that shoe and insert properties are both important and provide data to guide footwear design and management recommendations for PHP.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders.
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care.
The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care.
The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.