Joshua G Parmenter, Sonja D Winter, Zakary A Clements, Keely Alexander, Hannah Taylor
{"title":"社区和个人优势如何“填满我们的杯子”:LGBTQIA+社区基于优势的初步心理调解框架。","authors":"Joshua G Parmenter, Sonja D Winter, Zakary A Clements, Keely Alexander, Hannah Taylor","doi":"10.1037/cou0000807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The psychological mediation framework (PMF) has been used to examine how mechanisms explain the relations between minority stress and mental health disparities among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and agender (LGBTQIA+) communities. Though important in understanding LGBTQIA+ mental health, existing PMF research is deficit-focused and does not include the collective and individual strengths LGBTQIA+ people possess that are associated with well-being. Using a sample of 625 LGBTQIA+ people, the present study proposed a preliminary strengths-based PMF to examine how identity-specific and general strengths help explain the link between LGBTQIA+ community resilience and life satisfaction. Structural equation modeling analyses demonstrated that LGBTQIA+ community resilience was directly associated with life satisfaction, identity-specific strengths (e.g., identity affirmation, identity centrality, authenticity, relationship intimacy), and general strengths processes (e.g., self-compassion, hope, social support). Analyses suggested that higher LGBTQIA+ community resilience was associated with higher identity affirmation, which, in turn, was associated with decreased life satisfaction. LGBTQIA+ community resilience was also associated with life satisfaction through the general strengths processes of hope and social support. Our findings provide a preliminary strengths-based PMF that can be used to expand LGBTQIA+ PMF research. Implications for clinical practice and community-level interventions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"614-626"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How community and individual strengths \\\"fill our cup\\\": A preliminary strengths-based psychological mediation framework for LGBTQIA+ communities.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua G Parmenter, Sonja D Winter, Zakary A Clements, Keely Alexander, Hannah Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cou0000807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The psychological mediation framework (PMF) has been used to examine how mechanisms explain the relations between minority stress and mental health disparities among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and agender (LGBTQIA+) communities. Though important in understanding LGBTQIA+ mental health, existing PMF research is deficit-focused and does not include the collective and individual strengths LGBTQIA+ people possess that are associated with well-being. Using a sample of 625 LGBTQIA+ people, the present study proposed a preliminary strengths-based PMF to examine how identity-specific and general strengths help explain the link between LGBTQIA+ community resilience and life satisfaction. Structural equation modeling analyses demonstrated that LGBTQIA+ community resilience was directly associated with life satisfaction, identity-specific strengths (e.g., identity affirmation, identity centrality, authenticity, relationship intimacy), and general strengths processes (e.g., self-compassion, hope, social support). Analyses suggested that higher LGBTQIA+ community resilience was associated with higher identity affirmation, which, in turn, was associated with decreased life satisfaction. LGBTQIA+ community resilience was also associated with life satisfaction through the general strengths processes of hope and social support. Our findings provide a preliminary strengths-based PMF that can be used to expand LGBTQIA+ PMF research. Implications for clinical practice and community-level interventions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Counseling Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"614-626\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Counseling Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000807\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000807","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
心理中介框架(PMF)被用于研究如何解释少数群体压力与女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿、双性人、无性恋和无性别(LGBTQIA+)群体心理健康差异之间的关系。虽然对理解LGBTQIA+心理健康很重要,但现有的PMF研究主要集中在缺陷上,没有包括LGBTQIA+人群拥有的与幸福感相关的集体和个人优势。本研究以625名LGBTQIA+人群为样本,提出了一个初步的基于优势的PMF,以检验身份特异性和一般优势如何帮助解释LGBTQIA+社区弹性和生活满意度之间的联系。结构方程模型分析表明,LGBTQIA+社区弹性与生活满意度、身份特定优势(如身份肯定、身份中心性、真实性、关系亲密)和一般优势过程(如自我同情、希望、社会支持)直接相关。分析表明,较高的LGBTQIA+社区弹性与较高的身份肯定相关,而身份肯定又与生活满意度降低相关。LGBTQIA+社区恢复力也通过希望和社会支持的一般优势过程与生活满意度相关。我们的研究结果提供了一个初步的基于优势的PMF,可用于扩展LGBTQIA+ PMF的研究。对临床实践和社区干预的影响进行了讨论。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
How community and individual strengths "fill our cup": A preliminary strengths-based psychological mediation framework for LGBTQIA+ communities.
The psychological mediation framework (PMF) has been used to examine how mechanisms explain the relations between minority stress and mental health disparities among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and agender (LGBTQIA+) communities. Though important in understanding LGBTQIA+ mental health, existing PMF research is deficit-focused and does not include the collective and individual strengths LGBTQIA+ people possess that are associated with well-being. Using a sample of 625 LGBTQIA+ people, the present study proposed a preliminary strengths-based PMF to examine how identity-specific and general strengths help explain the link between LGBTQIA+ community resilience and life satisfaction. Structural equation modeling analyses demonstrated that LGBTQIA+ community resilience was directly associated with life satisfaction, identity-specific strengths (e.g., identity affirmation, identity centrality, authenticity, relationship intimacy), and general strengths processes (e.g., self-compassion, hope, social support). Analyses suggested that higher LGBTQIA+ community resilience was associated with higher identity affirmation, which, in turn, was associated with decreased life satisfaction. LGBTQIA+ community resilience was also associated with life satisfaction through the general strengths processes of hope and social support. Our findings provide a preliminary strengths-based PMF that can be used to expand LGBTQIA+ PMF research. Implications for clinical practice and community-level interventions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Counseling Psychology® publishes empirical research in the areas of counseling activities (including assessment, interventions, consultation, supervision, training, prevention, and psychological education) career development and vocational psychology diversity and underrepresented populations in relation to counseling activities the development of new measures to be used in counseling activities professional issues in counseling psychology In addition, the Journal of Counseling Psychology considers reviews or theoretical contributions that have the potential for stimulating further research in counseling psychology, and conceptual or empirical contributions about methodological issues in counseling psychology research.