小手,大创意:通过Beatrice Alemagna的《什么是孩子?》

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Claudia Ravaldi, Alfredo Vannacci
{"title":"小手,大创意:通过Beatrice Alemagna的《什么是孩子?》","authors":"Claudia Ravaldi, Alfredo Vannacci","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2025-013226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the use of Beatrice Alemagna's picture book 'What is a Child?' as a tool for understanding and implementing nurturing care principles in perinatal healthcare settings. Through mixed-methods analysis of forum discussions among 42 perinatal professionals, including psychologists, midwives, physicians, nurses, pharmacists and early childhood educators, we explored how engagement with the book's metaphorical and visual elements facilitated professional reflection and development. Qualitative analysis revealed four primary themes: the power of metaphors in conveying complex caregiving concepts, the importance of collective care and community support, understanding the temporality of care and fostering transformative dialogue. Quantitative analysis showed significant differences in thematic engagement across professional groups, with medical professionals emphasising physical health (20.8%) and nutrition (32.1%), while psychologists focused more on early learning opportunities (28.3%) and responsive caregiving (21.0%). However, the picture book's narrative framework encouraged professionals to transcend their domain-specific perspectives, fostering a more holistic appreciation of nurturing care principles. These findings suggest that carefully selected picture books can serve as sophisticated tools for professional development in perinatal care, particularly in translating abstract theoretical concepts into actionable insights while honouring different professional perspectives and expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Small hands, big ideas: exploring nurturing care through Beatrice Alemagna's 'What is a Child?'\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Ravaldi, Alfredo Vannacci\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/medhum-2025-013226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examines the use of Beatrice Alemagna's picture book 'What is a Child?' as a tool for understanding and implementing nurturing care principles in perinatal healthcare settings. Through mixed-methods analysis of forum discussions among 42 perinatal professionals, including psychologists, midwives, physicians, nurses, pharmacists and early childhood educators, we explored how engagement with the book's metaphorical and visual elements facilitated professional reflection and development. Qualitative analysis revealed four primary themes: the power of metaphors in conveying complex caregiving concepts, the importance of collective care and community support, understanding the temporality of care and fostering transformative dialogue. Quantitative analysis showed significant differences in thematic engagement across professional groups, with medical professionals emphasising physical health (20.8%) and nutrition (32.1%), while psychologists focused more on early learning opportunities (28.3%) and responsive caregiving (21.0%). However, the picture book's narrative framework encouraged professionals to transcend their domain-specific perspectives, fostering a more holistic appreciation of nurturing care principles. These findings suggest that carefully selected picture books can serve as sophisticated tools for professional development in perinatal care, particularly in translating abstract theoretical concepts into actionable insights while honouring different professional perspectives and expertise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Humanities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2025-013226\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2025-013226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究考察了Beatrice Alemagna的图画书《什么是孩子?》作为理解和实施围产期保健环境中培育护理原则的工具。通过对42位围产期专业人士(包括心理学家、助产士、医生、护士、药剂师和幼儿教育工作者)的论坛讨论进行混合方法分析,我们探索了如何利用本书的隐喻和视觉元素促进专业反思和发展。定性分析揭示了四个主要主题:隐喻在传达复杂护理概念方面的力量,集体护理和社区支持的重要性,理解护理的暂时性和促进变革对话。定量分析显示,各专业群体在主题参与方面存在显著差异,医疗专业人员强调身体健康(20.8%)和营养(32.1%),而心理学家更关注早期学习机会(28.3%)和响应性护理(21.0%)。然而,图画书的叙事框架鼓励专业人士超越他们特定领域的观点,培养对养育护理原则的更全面的欣赏。这些发现表明,精心挑选的图画书可以作为围产期护理专业发展的复杂工具,特别是在将抽象的理论概念转化为可操作的见解时,同时尊重不同的专业观点和专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Small hands, big ideas: exploring nurturing care through Beatrice Alemagna's 'What is a Child?'

This study examines the use of Beatrice Alemagna's picture book 'What is a Child?' as a tool for understanding and implementing nurturing care principles in perinatal healthcare settings. Through mixed-methods analysis of forum discussions among 42 perinatal professionals, including psychologists, midwives, physicians, nurses, pharmacists and early childhood educators, we explored how engagement with the book's metaphorical and visual elements facilitated professional reflection and development. Qualitative analysis revealed four primary themes: the power of metaphors in conveying complex caregiving concepts, the importance of collective care and community support, understanding the temporality of care and fostering transformative dialogue. Quantitative analysis showed significant differences in thematic engagement across professional groups, with medical professionals emphasising physical health (20.8%) and nutrition (32.1%), while psychologists focused more on early learning opportunities (28.3%) and responsive caregiving (21.0%). However, the picture book's narrative framework encouraged professionals to transcend their domain-specific perspectives, fostering a more holistic appreciation of nurturing care principles. These findings suggest that carefully selected picture books can serve as sophisticated tools for professional development in perinatal care, particularly in translating abstract theoretical concepts into actionable insights while honouring different professional perspectives and expertise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Humanities
Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信