评估基于CT模拟的共登记诊断MR图像对直肠癌断层治疗靶体积描绘和剂量分布的影响。

Q3 Medicine
Baranoosh Rahmani, Daryoush Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Mahnaz Roayaei
{"title":"评估基于CT模拟的共登记诊断MR图像对直肠癌断层治疗靶体积描绘和剂量分布的影响。","authors":"Baranoosh Rahmani, Daryoush Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Mahnaz Roayaei","doi":"10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2301-1580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has become a complementary imaging method for the treatment planning process due to the limitations of Computed Tomography (CT) imaging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the effect of co-registered MRI and CT (MRI/CT)-based target delineation on the dose to the target, small bowel, bladder, and femoral heads during Helical Tomotherapy (HT).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional prospective study, MRI in a prone position were obtained for 12 patients with rectal cancer at one-day intervals with simulation CT. Following the co-registration process with the deformable algorithm, target volumes are defined. Gross Tumor Volume (GTV), Clinical Target Volume (CTV), and Planning Target Volume (PTV) were delineated for each CT and MRI/CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GTV, CTV, and PTV mean values were significantly higher in the CT-based target delineation method than those in the MRI/CT-based method. In MRI/ CT-based plans, the mean HI value was significantly lower, and the mean Conformity Index (CI) value was significantly higher than that in CT-based plans. In a small bowl, the most of dosimetric parameters (D<sub>max</sub>, D<sub>mean</sub>, D<sub>50%</sub>, D<sub>50%</sub>, V<sub>40%</sub>, and V<sub>45%</sub>) were significantly higher for the CT-based plans. In the bladder, all dosimetric parameters, except V<sub>30%</sub>, were statistically higher in CT-based plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Co-registered MRI/CT-based treatment planning can produce better dose coverage for the target and reduce the delivered dose to the Organs at Risk (OARs) when compared to CT-based planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":38035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering","volume":"15 3","pages":"239-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Effect of Co-Registered Diagnostic MR Images Based CT Simulation on Target Volume Delineation and Dose Distribution for Tomotherapy of Rectal Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Baranoosh Rahmani, Daryoush Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Mahnaz Roayaei\",\"doi\":\"10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2301-1580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has become a complementary imaging method for the treatment planning process due to the limitations of Computed Tomography (CT) imaging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the effect of co-registered MRI and CT (MRI/CT)-based target delineation on the dose to the target, small bowel, bladder, and femoral heads during Helical Tomotherapy (HT).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional prospective study, MRI in a prone position were obtained for 12 patients with rectal cancer at one-day intervals with simulation CT. Following the co-registration process with the deformable algorithm, target volumes are defined. Gross Tumor Volume (GTV), Clinical Target Volume (CTV), and Planning Target Volume (PTV) were delineated for each CT and MRI/CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GTV, CTV, and PTV mean values were significantly higher in the CT-based target delineation method than those in the MRI/CT-based method. In MRI/ CT-based plans, the mean HI value was significantly lower, and the mean Conformity Index (CI) value was significantly higher than that in CT-based plans. In a small bowl, the most of dosimetric parameters (D<sub>max</sub>, D<sub>mean</sub>, D<sub>50%</sub>, D<sub>50%</sub>, V<sub>40%</sub>, and V<sub>45%</sub>) were significantly higher for the CT-based plans. In the bladder, all dosimetric parameters, except V<sub>30%</sub>, were statistically higher in CT-based plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Co-registered MRI/CT-based treatment planning can produce better dose coverage for the target and reduce the delivered dose to the Organs at Risk (OARs) when compared to CT-based planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"239-248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153486/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2301-1580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2301-1580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于计算机断层扫描(CT)成像的局限性,磁共振成像(MRI)已成为治疗计划过程中的一种补充成像方法。目的:本研究旨在评估联合注册MRI和CT (MRI/CT)为基础的靶点描绘对螺旋断层治疗(HT)过程中靶点、小肠、膀胱和股骨头剂量的影响。材料与方法:在本横断面前瞻性研究中,对12例直肠癌患者每隔一天进行模拟CT,获得俯卧位MRI。根据与可变形算法的共同配准过程,定义目标体积。对每台CT及MRI/CT的总肿瘤体积(GTV)、临床靶体积(CTV)和计划靶体积(PTV)进行划分。结果:基于ct的靶区描绘方法的GTV、CTV和PTV平均值明显高于MRI/ ct方法。MRI/ ct方案的平均HI值明显低于ct方案,平均符合性指数(CI)值明显高于ct方案。在小碗中,大多数剂量学参数(Dmax、Dmean、D50%、D50%、V40%和V45%)均显著高于ct方案。在膀胱中,除V30%外,所有剂量学参数在基于ct的方案中均有统计学意义上更高。结论:与基于ct的治疗计划相比,基于MRI/ ct的联合登记治疗计划可以为靶区提供更好的剂量覆盖,并减少对危险器官(OARs)的递送剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Effect of Co-Registered Diagnostic MR Images Based CT Simulation on Target Volume Delineation and Dose Distribution for Tomotherapy of Rectal Cancer.

Background: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has become a complementary imaging method for the treatment planning process due to the limitations of Computed Tomography (CT) imaging.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the effect of co-registered MRI and CT (MRI/CT)-based target delineation on the dose to the target, small bowel, bladder, and femoral heads during Helical Tomotherapy (HT).

Material and methods: In this cross-sectional prospective study, MRI in a prone position were obtained for 12 patients with rectal cancer at one-day intervals with simulation CT. Following the co-registration process with the deformable algorithm, target volumes are defined. Gross Tumor Volume (GTV), Clinical Target Volume (CTV), and Planning Target Volume (PTV) were delineated for each CT and MRI/CT.

Results: GTV, CTV, and PTV mean values were significantly higher in the CT-based target delineation method than those in the MRI/CT-based method. In MRI/ CT-based plans, the mean HI value was significantly lower, and the mean Conformity Index (CI) value was significantly higher than that in CT-based plans. In a small bowl, the most of dosimetric parameters (Dmax, Dmean, D50%, D50%, V40%, and V45%) were significantly higher for the CT-based plans. In the bladder, all dosimetric parameters, except V30%, were statistically higher in CT-based plans.

Conclusion: Co-registered MRI/CT-based treatment planning can produce better dose coverage for the target and reduce the delivered dose to the Organs at Risk (OARs) when compared to CT-based planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering (JBPE) is a bimonthly peer-reviewed English-language journal that publishes high-quality basic sciences and clinical research (experimental or theoretical) broadly concerned with the relationship of physics to medicine and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信