Dongfan Wang, Yan Zhang, Stone Sima, Zuoran Fan, Weiguo Zhu, Xiaolong Chen, Shibao Lu
{"title":"退行性腰椎侧凸术后冠状位错位的危险因素及其对临床结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Dongfan Wang, Yan Zhang, Stone Sima, Zuoran Fan, Weiguo Zhu, Xiaolong Chen, Shibao Lu","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-Analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify risk factors for postoperative coronal malalignment (CM) and evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative CM is a common complication after DLS surgery, with an incidence ranging from 20.7% to 38.9%. Identifying its risk factors and impact on surgical outcomes may enhance understanding of the condition and help optimize clinical management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The inclusion criteria were: (1) comparative studies analyzing CM versus non-CM in DLS patients, (2) outcomes reported including demographic data, surgical details, radiographic parameters, and patients-reported outcomes, and (3) observational studies published in English from the inception of the databases to January 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies with a total of 617 patients (191 CM, 426 non-CM) were included. Compared to the non-CM group, patients in the CM group had a higher proportion of females (P=0.03), larger major Cobb angle (P=0.005), greater LS curve Cobb angle (P<0.001), increased L4 tilt angle (P=0.01), L5 tilt angle (P<0.001), and AVT (P<0.001) preoperatively. Postoperatively, CM patients showed higher residual LS curve Cobb angle (P=0.02), L4 tilt angle (P=0.04), and L5 tilt angle (P<0.001), as well as a lower LS curve Cobb angle correction rate (P=0.005). Additionally, the CM group exhibited higher ODI score (P=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Female sex, more severe preoperative coronal deformity, and insufficient correction of the lumbosacral curve are significant factors for postoperative CM following DLS surgery. The presence of CM is associated with diminished functional improvement after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for Postoperative Coronal Malalignment in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Its Impact on Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Dongfan Wang, Yan Zhang, Stone Sima, Zuoran Fan, Weiguo Zhu, Xiaolong Chen, Shibao Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-Analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify risk factors for postoperative coronal malalignment (CM) and evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative CM is a common complication after DLS surgery, with an incidence ranging from 20.7% to 38.9%. Identifying its risk factors and impact on surgical outcomes may enhance understanding of the condition and help optimize clinical management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The inclusion criteria were: (1) comparative studies analyzing CM versus non-CM in DLS patients, (2) outcomes reported including demographic data, surgical details, radiographic parameters, and patients-reported outcomes, and (3) observational studies published in English from the inception of the databases to January 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies with a total of 617 patients (191 CM, 426 non-CM) were included. Compared to the non-CM group, patients in the CM group had a higher proportion of females (P=0.03), larger major Cobb angle (P=0.005), greater LS curve Cobb angle (P<0.001), increased L4 tilt angle (P=0.01), L5 tilt angle (P<0.001), and AVT (P<0.001) preoperatively. Postoperatively, CM patients showed higher residual LS curve Cobb angle (P=0.02), L4 tilt angle (P=0.04), and L5 tilt angle (P<0.001), as well as a lower LS curve Cobb angle correction rate (P=0.005). Additionally, the CM group exhibited higher ODI score (P=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Female sex, more severe preoperative coronal deformity, and insufficient correction of the lumbosacral curve are significant factors for postoperative CM following DLS surgery. The presence of CM is associated with diminished functional improvement after surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005429\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005429","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk Factors for Postoperative Coronal Malalignment in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Its Impact on Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Study design: Systematic review and meta-Analysis.
Objective: To identify risk factors for postoperative coronal malalignment (CM) and evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS).
Background: Postoperative CM is a common complication after DLS surgery, with an incidence ranging from 20.7% to 38.9%. Identifying its risk factors and impact on surgical outcomes may enhance understanding of the condition and help optimize clinical management strategies.
Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The inclusion criteria were: (1) comparative studies analyzing CM versus non-CM in DLS patients, (2) outcomes reported including demographic data, surgical details, radiographic parameters, and patients-reported outcomes, and (3) observational studies published in English from the inception of the databases to January 2024.
Results: Seven studies with a total of 617 patients (191 CM, 426 non-CM) were included. Compared to the non-CM group, patients in the CM group had a higher proportion of females (P=0.03), larger major Cobb angle (P=0.005), greater LS curve Cobb angle (P<0.001), increased L4 tilt angle (P=0.01), L5 tilt angle (P<0.001), and AVT (P<0.001) preoperatively. Postoperatively, CM patients showed higher residual LS curve Cobb angle (P=0.02), L4 tilt angle (P=0.04), and L5 tilt angle (P<0.001), as well as a lower LS curve Cobb angle correction rate (P=0.005). Additionally, the CM group exhibited higher ODI score (P=0.003).
Conclusion: Female sex, more severe preoperative coronal deformity, and insufficient correction of the lumbosacral curve are significant factors for postoperative CM following DLS surgery. The presence of CM is associated with diminished functional improvement after surgery.
期刊介绍:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.