Damiano Dei, Nicola Lambri, Claudia Sopranzi, Carmela Galdieri, Ciro Franzese, Marta Scorsetti, Pietro Mancosu
{"title":"缩短模拟CT至治疗递送间隔对全骨髓淋巴结照射剂量学和定位精度的影响。","authors":"Damiano Dei, Nicola Lambri, Claudia Sopranzi, Carmela Galdieri, Ciro Franzese, Marta Scorsetti, Pietro Mancosu","doi":"10.1007/s00066-025-02415-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Total marrow (lymph-node) irradiation (TMI/TMLI) is designed to minimize toxicities of conventional total body irradiation in hematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioning. Planning typically relies on a computed tomography (CT) scan acquired many days before treatment (e.g. 15 days; CT-15) to allow time for plan optimization. However, anatomical changes during this interval, influenced by patient condition and concurrent therapies, can compromise dosimetric accuracy. This study evaluates the impact of shortening the CT-to-treatment timeframe to 4 days (CT-4) on dosimetric and positioning accuracy in TMI/TMLI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen patients were enrolled in this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04976205). Treatment plans, optimized with a multi-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy on CT-15, were recalculated on CT‑4 to assess changes in planning target volume (PTV) dose coverage (PTV_D98%). Image matching quality between CT-15/CT‑4 and cone-beam CT acquisitions was assessed with a scale of 1 to 5. Wilcoxon signed-rank test with significance set at p < 0.05 was considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant reduction in median PTV_D98% was found between CT-15 (98.0%, minimum/maximum [98.0, 98.0]%) and CT‑4 (92.2%, [62.9, 98.9]%). Image matching quality improved in 72% of patients using CT‑4 compared to CT-15. In 11% of cases, relevant discrepancies required re-optimization using CT‑4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings underscore the benefits of a shorter CT-to-treatment timeframe for improving dosimetric and positioning accuracy in TMI/TMLI. Automated planning tools may further enhance TMI/TMLI workflows, particularly for patients undergoing intensive conditioning protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":21998,"journal":{"name":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of reduced interval from simulation CT to treatment delivery on dosimetric and positioning accuracy for total marrow lymph-node irradiation.\",\"authors\":\"Damiano Dei, Nicola Lambri, Claudia Sopranzi, Carmela Galdieri, Ciro Franzese, Marta Scorsetti, Pietro Mancosu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00066-025-02415-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Total marrow (lymph-node) irradiation (TMI/TMLI) is designed to minimize toxicities of conventional total body irradiation in hematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioning. Planning typically relies on a computed tomography (CT) scan acquired many days before treatment (e.g. 15 days; CT-15) to allow time for plan optimization. However, anatomical changes during this interval, influenced by patient condition and concurrent therapies, can compromise dosimetric accuracy. This study evaluates the impact of shortening the CT-to-treatment timeframe to 4 days (CT-4) on dosimetric and positioning accuracy in TMI/TMLI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen patients were enrolled in this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04976205). Treatment plans, optimized with a multi-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy on CT-15, were recalculated on CT‑4 to assess changes in planning target volume (PTV) dose coverage (PTV_D98%). Image matching quality between CT-15/CT‑4 and cone-beam CT acquisitions was assessed with a scale of 1 to 5. Wilcoxon signed-rank test with significance set at p < 0.05 was considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant reduction in median PTV_D98% was found between CT-15 (98.0%, minimum/maximum [98.0, 98.0]%) and CT‑4 (92.2%, [62.9, 98.9]%). Image matching quality improved in 72% of patients using CT‑4 compared to CT-15. In 11% of cases, relevant discrepancies required re-optimization using CT‑4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings underscore the benefits of a shorter CT-to-treatment timeframe for improving dosimetric and positioning accuracy in TMI/TMLI. Automated planning tools may further enhance TMI/TMLI workflows, particularly for patients undergoing intensive conditioning protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-025-02415-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-025-02415-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of reduced interval from simulation CT to treatment delivery on dosimetric and positioning accuracy for total marrow lymph-node irradiation.
Purpose: Total marrow (lymph-node) irradiation (TMI/TMLI) is designed to minimize toxicities of conventional total body irradiation in hematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioning. Planning typically relies on a computed tomography (CT) scan acquired many days before treatment (e.g. 15 days; CT-15) to allow time for plan optimization. However, anatomical changes during this interval, influenced by patient condition and concurrent therapies, can compromise dosimetric accuracy. This study evaluates the impact of shortening the CT-to-treatment timeframe to 4 days (CT-4) on dosimetric and positioning accuracy in TMI/TMLI.
Methods: Eighteen patients were enrolled in this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04976205). Treatment plans, optimized with a multi-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy on CT-15, were recalculated on CT‑4 to assess changes in planning target volume (PTV) dose coverage (PTV_D98%). Image matching quality between CT-15/CT‑4 and cone-beam CT acquisitions was assessed with a scale of 1 to 5. Wilcoxon signed-rank test with significance set at p < 0.05 was considered.
Results: A significant reduction in median PTV_D98% was found between CT-15 (98.0%, minimum/maximum [98.0, 98.0]%) and CT‑4 (92.2%, [62.9, 98.9]%). Image matching quality improved in 72% of patients using CT‑4 compared to CT-15. In 11% of cases, relevant discrepancies required re-optimization using CT‑4.
Conclusions: These findings underscore the benefits of a shorter CT-to-treatment timeframe for improving dosimetric and positioning accuracy in TMI/TMLI. Automated planning tools may further enhance TMI/TMLI workflows, particularly for patients undergoing intensive conditioning protocols.
期刊介绍:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, published monthly, is a scientific journal that covers all aspects of oncology with focus on radiooncology, radiation biology and radiation physics. The articles are not only of interest to radiooncologists but to all physicians interested in oncology, to radiation biologists and radiation physicists. The journal publishes original articles, review articles and case studies that are peer-reviewed. It includes scientific short communications as well as a literature review with annotated articles that inform the reader on new developments in the various disciplines concerned and hence allow for a sound overview on the latest results in radiooncology research.
Founded in 1912, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie is the oldest oncological journal in the world. Today, contributions are published in English and German. All articles have English summaries and legends. The journal is the official publication of several scientific radiooncological societies and publishes the relevant communications of these societies.