昼行与夜行萤触角感受器的多样性(鞘翅目,夜蛾科)。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0323722
Yelena M Pacheco, Ethan Mann, Luiz F L Da Silveira, Seth M Bybee, Marc A Branham, Joseph V McHugh, Kathrin F Stanger-Hall
{"title":"昼行与夜行萤触角感受器的多样性(鞘翅目,夜蛾科)。","authors":"Yelena M Pacheco, Ethan Mann, Luiz F L Da Silveira, Seth M Bybee, Marc A Branham, Joseph V McHugh, Kathrin F Stanger-Hall","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0323722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Insects use their antennae to collect environmental information. While the structural diversity of insect antennae is immediately obvious, the diversity of the minute antennal sensilla that interact with the environmental stimuli and translate them into sensory input, is largely unknown for many insect groups. This includes the beetle family Lampyridae, which includes nocturnal species that use bioluminescent signals during mate search, and diurnal species that rely exclusively on pheromones to identify and locate a potential mate. Relative to their bodysize, diurnal species tend to have larger antennae, and diurnal males have larger antennae than their females. It is generally assumed that antennal size reflects sensilla numbers, but this remains to be tested. We used Scanning Electron Microscopy to document the sensilla diversity of both males and females of three diurnal and four nocturnal firefly species, as well as total sensilla numbers, densities and their distribution along the antenna. We identified 14 sensilla morphotypes across the seven species, including 12 morphotypes that are new for Lampyridae. Based on their putative function we sorted all sensilla into two categories, mechanoreceptors and chemoreceptors. Mechanosensilla (3 morphotypes) were the most abundant and conserved sensilla across firefly species, and the distribution of chemosensilla (9 morphotypes) was unexpectedly variable across species. We hypothesized that the differences in mating signals between diurnal and nocturnal fireflies would be reflected in their chemosensilla counts or densities. As predicted, diurnal and nocturnal fireflies did not differ in their mechanosensilla counts or densities, nor did males and females. In contrast, firefly males had significantly more chemosensilla (and higher densities) than females and the interaction term (activity by sex) was also significant: diurnal males had significantly more chemosensilla than nocturnal males, highlighting the importance of pheromones for diurnal species. Based on a series of predictions, we also identified a pheromone sensilla candidate for each species that will facilitate functional testing in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0323722"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antennal sensilla diversity in diurnal and nocturnal fireflies (Coleoptera, Lampyridae).\",\"authors\":\"Yelena M Pacheco, Ethan Mann, Luiz F L Da Silveira, Seth M Bybee, Marc A Branham, Joseph V McHugh, Kathrin F Stanger-Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0323722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Insects use their antennae to collect environmental information. While the structural diversity of insect antennae is immediately obvious, the diversity of the minute antennal sensilla that interact with the environmental stimuli and translate them into sensory input, is largely unknown for many insect groups. This includes the beetle family Lampyridae, which includes nocturnal species that use bioluminescent signals during mate search, and diurnal species that rely exclusively on pheromones to identify and locate a potential mate. Relative to their bodysize, diurnal species tend to have larger antennae, and diurnal males have larger antennae than their females. It is generally assumed that antennal size reflects sensilla numbers, but this remains to be tested. We used Scanning Electron Microscopy to document the sensilla diversity of both males and females of three diurnal and four nocturnal firefly species, as well as total sensilla numbers, densities and their distribution along the antenna. We identified 14 sensilla morphotypes across the seven species, including 12 morphotypes that are new for Lampyridae. Based on their putative function we sorted all sensilla into two categories, mechanoreceptors and chemoreceptors. Mechanosensilla (3 morphotypes) were the most abundant and conserved sensilla across firefly species, and the distribution of chemosensilla (9 morphotypes) was unexpectedly variable across species. We hypothesized that the differences in mating signals between diurnal and nocturnal fireflies would be reflected in their chemosensilla counts or densities. As predicted, diurnal and nocturnal fireflies did not differ in their mechanosensilla counts or densities, nor did males and females. In contrast, firefly males had significantly more chemosensilla (and higher densities) than females and the interaction term (activity by sex) was also significant: diurnal males had significantly more chemosensilla than nocturnal males, highlighting the importance of pheromones for diurnal species. Based on a series of predictions, we also identified a pheromone sensilla candidate for each species that will facilitate functional testing in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"e0323722\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161595/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323722\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323722","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

昆虫用触角收集环境信息。虽然昆虫触角的结构多样性是显而易见的,但对于许多昆虫群体来说,与环境刺激相互作用并将其转化为感觉输入的微小触角感受器的多样性在很大程度上是未知的。这包括甲虫科Lampyridae,其中包括夜间活动的物种,它们在寻找配偶时使用生物发光信号,以及白天活动的物种,它们完全依靠信息素来识别和定位潜在的配偶。相对于它们的身体大小,昼行物种往往有更大的触须,而昼行物种的雄触须比雌触须大。一般认为触角的大小反映了感受器的数量,但这还有待检验。利用扫描电子显微镜对3种昼行性和4种夜行性萤火虫的雌雄感器多样性、总感器数量、密度及其沿触角的分布进行了研究。在7个物种中鉴定出14种感受器形态,其中12种为Lampyridae的新形态。根据它们的功能,我们将所有的感觉器分为两类,机械感受器和化学感受器。机械感受器(3种形态)是萤火虫种类中最丰富和最保守的感受器,而化学感受器(9种形态)的分布在不同种类之间发生了意想不到的变化。我们假设,日间和夜间萤火虫之间交配信号的差异将反映在它们的化学感受器数量或密度上。正如预测的那样,白天和夜间活动的萤火虫在机械感受器的数量和密度上没有差异,雄性和雌性也没有差异。相比之下,雄性萤火虫比雌性有更多的化学感知器(密度更高),相互作用项(性别活动)也很显著:白天的雄性比夜间的雄性有更多的化学感知器,突出了信息素对白天物种的重要性。基于一系列的预测,我们还确定了每个物种的信息素感受器候选,这将有助于在未来的研究中进行功能测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antennal sensilla diversity in diurnal and nocturnal fireflies (Coleoptera, Lampyridae).

Insects use their antennae to collect environmental information. While the structural diversity of insect antennae is immediately obvious, the diversity of the minute antennal sensilla that interact with the environmental stimuli and translate them into sensory input, is largely unknown for many insect groups. This includes the beetle family Lampyridae, which includes nocturnal species that use bioluminescent signals during mate search, and diurnal species that rely exclusively on pheromones to identify and locate a potential mate. Relative to their bodysize, diurnal species tend to have larger antennae, and diurnal males have larger antennae than their females. It is generally assumed that antennal size reflects sensilla numbers, but this remains to be tested. We used Scanning Electron Microscopy to document the sensilla diversity of both males and females of three diurnal and four nocturnal firefly species, as well as total sensilla numbers, densities and their distribution along the antenna. We identified 14 sensilla morphotypes across the seven species, including 12 morphotypes that are new for Lampyridae. Based on their putative function we sorted all sensilla into two categories, mechanoreceptors and chemoreceptors. Mechanosensilla (3 morphotypes) were the most abundant and conserved sensilla across firefly species, and the distribution of chemosensilla (9 morphotypes) was unexpectedly variable across species. We hypothesized that the differences in mating signals between diurnal and nocturnal fireflies would be reflected in their chemosensilla counts or densities. As predicted, diurnal and nocturnal fireflies did not differ in their mechanosensilla counts or densities, nor did males and females. In contrast, firefly males had significantly more chemosensilla (and higher densities) than females and the interaction term (activity by sex) was also significant: diurnal males had significantly more chemosensilla than nocturnal males, highlighting the importance of pheromones for diurnal species. Based on a series of predictions, we also identified a pheromone sensilla candidate for each species that will facilitate functional testing in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信