Diego Ribuffo, Marco Marcasciano, Federico Lo Torto, Jacopo Nanni, Luca Patanè, Lorenzo Calabrese, Davide Marino, Donato Casella, Manfredi Greco
{"title":"反向乳下脂肪筋膜穿支皮瓣:双平面、无细胞真皮基质、直接植入体混合重建的初步结果。","authors":"Diego Ribuffo, Marco Marcasciano, Federico Lo Torto, Jacopo Nanni, Luca Patanè, Lorenzo Calabrese, Davide Marino, Donato Casella, Manfredi Greco","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-stage direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction, particularly the prepectoral technique, has become prominent due to its reliable outcomes and shorter operative time. This approach spares the pectoralis major muscle, reducing postoperative pain and morbidity, and ensuring quicker recovery. However, limitations such as patient comorbidities and tumor characteristics can limit feasibility, leading to complications and high reconstructive failure rates. In such cases, switching to autologous or 2-stage approaches becomes necessary. This study introduced an innovative acellular dermal matrix-free dual-plane DTI hybrid reconstruction using a reverse submammary adipofascial perforator flap for small-volume breasts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective noncontrolled cohort study was conducted from January to April 2024, enrolling 10 breast cancer patients eligible for DTI reconstruction. Data collected included preoperative clinical characteristics, intraoperative surgical data, and postoperative outcomes, including complications and patient satisfaction measured using BREAST-Q version 2.0. Breast aesthetics was also evaluated by 12 independent observers at minimum 3 months follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgical technique involved a dual-plane pocket with a reverse submammary adipofascial perforator flap, harvested from the inframammary fold, anchored to the pectoralis major muscle for inferolateral pole coverage of the breast implant. Results showed 1 major complication requiring surgical revision and 1 minor skin flap necrosis managed conservatively. All patients reported good satisfaction with their reconstruction results, supported by positive aesthetic evaluations from observers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This acellular dermal matrix-free, dual-plane DTI hybrid technique seems safe and effective for small-volume breasts. It offers a viable alternative for selected cases, warranting further investigation with larger cohorts and longer follow-ups.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 6","pages":"e6847"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12160741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reverse Submammary Adipofascial Perforator Flap: Preliminary Results of a Dual-plane, Acellular Dermal Matrix-free, Direct-to-implant Hybrid Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Diego Ribuffo, Marco Marcasciano, Federico Lo Torto, Jacopo Nanni, Luca Patanè, Lorenzo Calabrese, Davide Marino, Donato Casella, Manfredi Greco\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-stage direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction, particularly the prepectoral technique, has become prominent due to its reliable outcomes and shorter operative time. This approach spares the pectoralis major muscle, reducing postoperative pain and morbidity, and ensuring quicker recovery. However, limitations such as patient comorbidities and tumor characteristics can limit feasibility, leading to complications and high reconstructive failure rates. In such cases, switching to autologous or 2-stage approaches becomes necessary. This study introduced an innovative acellular dermal matrix-free dual-plane DTI hybrid reconstruction using a reverse submammary adipofascial perforator flap for small-volume breasts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective noncontrolled cohort study was conducted from January to April 2024, enrolling 10 breast cancer patients eligible for DTI reconstruction. Data collected included preoperative clinical characteristics, intraoperative surgical data, and postoperative outcomes, including complications and patient satisfaction measured using BREAST-Q version 2.0. Breast aesthetics was also evaluated by 12 independent observers at minimum 3 months follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surgical technique involved a dual-plane pocket with a reverse submammary adipofascial perforator flap, harvested from the inframammary fold, anchored to the pectoralis major muscle for inferolateral pole coverage of the breast implant. Results showed 1 major complication requiring surgical revision and 1 minor skin flap necrosis managed conservatively. All patients reported good satisfaction with their reconstruction results, supported by positive aesthetic evaluations from observers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This acellular dermal matrix-free, dual-plane DTI hybrid technique seems safe and effective for small-volume breasts. It offers a viable alternative for selected cases, warranting further investigation with larger cohorts and longer follow-ups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"e6847\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12160741/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006847\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reverse Submammary Adipofascial Perforator Flap: Preliminary Results of a Dual-plane, Acellular Dermal Matrix-free, Direct-to-implant Hybrid Reconstruction.
Background: Single-stage direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction, particularly the prepectoral technique, has become prominent due to its reliable outcomes and shorter operative time. This approach spares the pectoralis major muscle, reducing postoperative pain and morbidity, and ensuring quicker recovery. However, limitations such as patient comorbidities and tumor characteristics can limit feasibility, leading to complications and high reconstructive failure rates. In such cases, switching to autologous or 2-stage approaches becomes necessary. This study introduced an innovative acellular dermal matrix-free dual-plane DTI hybrid reconstruction using a reverse submammary adipofascial perforator flap for small-volume breasts.
Methods: A prospective noncontrolled cohort study was conducted from January to April 2024, enrolling 10 breast cancer patients eligible for DTI reconstruction. Data collected included preoperative clinical characteristics, intraoperative surgical data, and postoperative outcomes, including complications and patient satisfaction measured using BREAST-Q version 2.0. Breast aesthetics was also evaluated by 12 independent observers at minimum 3 months follow-up.
Results: The surgical technique involved a dual-plane pocket with a reverse submammary adipofascial perforator flap, harvested from the inframammary fold, anchored to the pectoralis major muscle for inferolateral pole coverage of the breast implant. Results showed 1 major complication requiring surgical revision and 1 minor skin flap necrosis managed conservatively. All patients reported good satisfaction with their reconstruction results, supported by positive aesthetic evaluations from observers.
Conclusions: This acellular dermal matrix-free, dual-plane DTI hybrid technique seems safe and effective for small-volume breasts. It offers a viable alternative for selected cases, warranting further investigation with larger cohorts and longer follow-ups.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.