{"title":"异麦芽糖对糖尿病和健康人群血糖反应的影响:一项荟萃分析","authors":"Zhaojie Chen, Fangting Gu, Jianyong Wu","doi":"10.3390/nu17111940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective management of postprandial glycemic control is critical for diabetic patients, as elevated postprandial glucose levels can lead to complications such as cardiovascular disease and neuropathy. This study evaluates isomaltulose, a low-glycemic-index carbohydrate, as an alternative to sucrose in mitigating postprandial glucose spikes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To synthesize evidence from existing studies and assess the efficacy of isomaltulose in reducing postprandial glycemic levels compared to sucrose in diabetic populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials or crossover studies comparing isomaltulose and sucrose. Data were extracted, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included, involving 367 participants. The meta-analysis showed that isomaltulose significantly reduced plasma glucose level at 60 min post-meal, though the actual effect could be modest in terms of clinical relevance compared to sucrose (MD: -7.99, 95% CI: -8.58, -7.39, <i>p</i> < 0.00001). Notable variability in the study results was observed, which may be attributed to multiple factors such as participant demographics and meal composition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings from the analysis are supportive for the use of isomaltulose as a beneficial dietary alternative to sucrose for managing postprandial glycemic levels in diabetic patients. Future research effort is suggested to focus on larger, diverse populations to enhance generalizability and explore the impact of dietary context on glycemic response.</p>","PeriodicalId":19486,"journal":{"name":"Nutrients","volume":"17 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12157287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Isomaltulose on Glycemic Response in Diabetic and Healthy Populations: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhaojie Chen, Fangting Gu, Jianyong Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nu17111940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective management of postprandial glycemic control is critical for diabetic patients, as elevated postprandial glucose levels can lead to complications such as cardiovascular disease and neuropathy. This study evaluates isomaltulose, a low-glycemic-index carbohydrate, as an alternative to sucrose in mitigating postprandial glucose spikes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To synthesize evidence from existing studies and assess the efficacy of isomaltulose in reducing postprandial glycemic levels compared to sucrose in diabetic populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials or crossover studies comparing isomaltulose and sucrose. Data were extracted, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies were included, involving 367 participants. The meta-analysis showed that isomaltulose significantly reduced plasma glucose level at 60 min post-meal, though the actual effect could be modest in terms of clinical relevance compared to sucrose (MD: -7.99, 95% CI: -8.58, -7.39, <i>p</i> < 0.00001). Notable variability in the study results was observed, which may be attributed to multiple factors such as participant demographics and meal composition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings from the analysis are supportive for the use of isomaltulose as a beneficial dietary alternative to sucrose for managing postprandial glycemic levels in diabetic patients. Future research effort is suggested to focus on larger, diverse populations to enhance generalizability and explore the impact of dietary context on glycemic response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrients\",\"volume\":\"17 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12157287/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrients\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17111940\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrients","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17111940","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:有效的餐后血糖控制对糖尿病患者至关重要,因为餐后血糖水平升高可导致心血管疾病和神经病变等并发症。本研究评估了异麦芽糖,一种低血糖指数碳水化合物,作为蔗糖的替代品,在减轻餐后血糖峰值。目的:综合现有研究的证据,评估异麦芽糖与蔗糖相比在糖尿病人群中降低餐后血糖水平的功效。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。我们在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov上搜索比较异麦芽糖和蔗糖的随机对照试验或交叉研究。提取数据,使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。结果:纳入10项研究,涉及367名受试者。荟萃分析显示,异麦糖糖可显著降低餐后60分钟的血糖水平,但与蔗糖相比,实际效果可能不大(MD: -7.99, 95% CI: -8.58, -7.39, p < 0.00001)。在研究结果中观察到显著的可变性,这可能归因于多种因素,如参与者人口统计和膳食组成。结论:分析结果支持使用异麦芽糖作为控制糖尿病患者餐后血糖水平的有益膳食替代蔗糖。建议未来的研究工作集中在更大、更多样化的人群上,以提高普遍性,并探索饮食环境对血糖反应的影响。
Impact of Isomaltulose on Glycemic Response in Diabetic and Healthy Populations: A Meta-Analysis.
Background: Effective management of postprandial glycemic control is critical for diabetic patients, as elevated postprandial glucose levels can lead to complications such as cardiovascular disease and neuropathy. This study evaluates isomaltulose, a low-glycemic-index carbohydrate, as an alternative to sucrose in mitigating postprandial glucose spikes.
Objectives: To synthesize evidence from existing studies and assess the efficacy of isomaltulose in reducing postprandial glycemic levels compared to sucrose in diabetic populations.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials or crossover studies comparing isomaltulose and sucrose. Data were extracted, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess study quality.
Results: Ten studies were included, involving 367 participants. The meta-analysis showed that isomaltulose significantly reduced plasma glucose level at 60 min post-meal, though the actual effect could be modest in terms of clinical relevance compared to sucrose (MD: -7.99, 95% CI: -8.58, -7.39, p < 0.00001). Notable variability in the study results was observed, which may be attributed to multiple factors such as participant demographics and meal composition.
Conclusions: The findings from the analysis are supportive for the use of isomaltulose as a beneficial dietary alternative to sucrose for managing postprandial glycemic levels in diabetic patients. Future research effort is suggested to focus on larger, diverse populations to enhance generalizability and explore the impact of dietary context on glycemic response.
期刊介绍:
Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643) is an international, peer-reviewed open access advanced forum for studies related to Human Nutrition. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.