每周阿达木单抗治疗难治性非感染性葡萄膜炎的长期有效性和安全性。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Abdülcemal Gürpınar, Mertcan Esenkaya, Bilge Eraydin, Hilal Eser-Ozturk, Yüksel Süllü
{"title":"每周阿达木单抗治疗难治性非感染性葡萄膜炎的长期有效性和安全性。","authors":"Abdülcemal Gürpınar, Mertcan Esenkaya, Bilge Eraydin, Hilal Eser-Ozturk, Yüksel Süllü","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2516826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of weekly adalimumab after dose escalation in patients with chronic refractory non-infectious uveitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged 18 years and older with persistent chronic uveitis despite bi-weekly adalimumab treatment. Data collected included uveitis diagnosis, anatomical site of involvement, history of immunosuppressive treatments, relapse frequency, and other relevant clinical parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 30 patients (18 females and 12 males) with a median age of 33.5 (22-57) years and a mean follow-up period of 62.6 ± 25.2 months. Median visual acuity was 0.29 logMAR (0.22-0.40) with bi-weekly adalimumab treatment and improved to 0.20 logMAR (0.10-0.36) with weekly adalimumab treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.009). A significant reduction in central macular thickness was observed with weekly adalimumab treatment compared to the bi-weekly regimen (259.67 µm vs. 336.47 µm, <i>p</i> = 0.001). The frequency of relapses was 1.9 ± 0.66 with bi-weekly treatment and 0.53 ± 0.33 with weekly treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.001). The proportion of patients exhibiting active ocular inflammation requiring systemic steroids was 60% in the bi-weekly treatment, compared to 24.3% in the weekly treatment. In terms of adverse effect profile, both treatment modalities exhibited similar characteristics. Weekly adalimumab is associated with a significantly reduced risk of relapse compared with bi-weekly ADA (HR = 0.267, <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Weekly adalimumab treatment is a viable option for managing inflammation in refractory uveitis, providing enhanced efficacy to the standard dose in terms of visual and anatomical outcomes, while maintaining a comparable side effect profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Weekly Adalimumab in Refractory Non-Infectious Uveitis.\",\"authors\":\"Abdülcemal Gürpınar, Mertcan Esenkaya, Bilge Eraydin, Hilal Eser-Ozturk, Yüksel Süllü\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09273948.2025.2516826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of weekly adalimumab after dose escalation in patients with chronic refractory non-infectious uveitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged 18 years and older with persistent chronic uveitis despite bi-weekly adalimumab treatment. Data collected included uveitis diagnosis, anatomical site of involvement, history of immunosuppressive treatments, relapse frequency, and other relevant clinical parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 30 patients (18 females and 12 males) with a median age of 33.5 (22-57) years and a mean follow-up period of 62.6 ± 25.2 months. Median visual acuity was 0.29 logMAR (0.22-0.40) with bi-weekly adalimumab treatment and improved to 0.20 logMAR (0.10-0.36) with weekly adalimumab treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.009). A significant reduction in central macular thickness was observed with weekly adalimumab treatment compared to the bi-weekly regimen (259.67 µm vs. 336.47 µm, <i>p</i> = 0.001). The frequency of relapses was 1.9 ± 0.66 with bi-weekly treatment and 0.53 ± 0.33 with weekly treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.001). The proportion of patients exhibiting active ocular inflammation requiring systemic steroids was 60% in the bi-weekly treatment, compared to 24.3% in the weekly treatment. In terms of adverse effect profile, both treatment modalities exhibited similar characteristics. Weekly adalimumab is associated with a significantly reduced risk of relapse compared with bi-weekly ADA (HR = 0.267, <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Weekly adalimumab treatment is a viable option for managing inflammation in refractory uveitis, providing enhanced efficacy to the standard dose in terms of visual and anatomical outcomes, while maintaining a comparable side effect profile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2516826\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2516826","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估慢性难治性非感染性葡萄膜炎患者在剂量递增后每周阿达木单抗的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析18岁及以上的持续性慢性葡萄膜炎患者,尽管每两周接受阿达木单抗治疗。收集的资料包括葡萄膜炎的诊断、受累解剖部位、免疫抑制治疗史、复发频率和其他相关临床参数。结果:本研究纳入30例患者,其中女性18例,男性12例,中位年龄33.5(22-57)岁,平均随访62.6±25.2个月。两周阿达木单抗治疗的中位视力为0.29 logMAR(0.22-0.40),而每周阿达木单抗治疗的中位视力为0.20 logMAR (0.10-0.36) (p = 0.009)。与双周方案相比,每周一次阿达木单抗治疗可显著降低中央黄斑厚度(259.67µm vs. 336.47µm, p = 0.001)。两周治疗组复发次数为1.9±0.66次,一周治疗组复发次数为0.53±0.33次(p = 0.001)。在两周治疗中,60%的患者表现出活动性眼部炎症,需要全身类固醇治疗,而在每周一次治疗中,这一比例为24.3%。在不良反应方面,两种治疗方式表现出相似的特征。与双周ADA相比,每周一次阿达木单抗与复发风险显著降低相关(HR = 0.267, p = 0.001)。结论:每周阿达木单抗治疗是治疗难治性葡萄膜炎的可行选择,在视觉和解剖结果方面提供比标准剂量更高的疗效,同时保持相当的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Weekly Adalimumab in Refractory Non-Infectious Uveitis.

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of weekly adalimumab after dose escalation in patients with chronic refractory non-infectious uveitis.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged 18 years and older with persistent chronic uveitis despite bi-weekly adalimumab treatment. Data collected included uveitis diagnosis, anatomical site of involvement, history of immunosuppressive treatments, relapse frequency, and other relevant clinical parameters.

Results: This study included 30 patients (18 females and 12 males) with a median age of 33.5 (22-57) years and a mean follow-up period of 62.6 ± 25.2 months. Median visual acuity was 0.29 logMAR (0.22-0.40) with bi-weekly adalimumab treatment and improved to 0.20 logMAR (0.10-0.36) with weekly adalimumab treatment (p = 0.009). A significant reduction in central macular thickness was observed with weekly adalimumab treatment compared to the bi-weekly regimen (259.67 µm vs. 336.47 µm, p = 0.001). The frequency of relapses was 1.9 ± 0.66 with bi-weekly treatment and 0.53 ± 0.33 with weekly treatment (p = 0.001). The proportion of patients exhibiting active ocular inflammation requiring systemic steroids was 60% in the bi-weekly treatment, compared to 24.3% in the weekly treatment. In terms of adverse effect profile, both treatment modalities exhibited similar characteristics. Weekly adalimumab is associated with a significantly reduced risk of relapse compared with bi-weekly ADA (HR = 0.267, p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Weekly adalimumab treatment is a viable option for managing inflammation in refractory uveitis, providing enhanced efficacy to the standard dose in terms of visual and anatomical outcomes, while maintaining a comparable side effect profile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
15.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ocular Immunology & Inflammation ranks 18 out of 59 in the Ophthalmology Category.Ocular Immunology and Inflammation is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and vision scientists. Published bimonthly, the journal provides an international medium for basic and clinical research reports on the ocular inflammatory response and its control by the immune system. The journal publishes original research papers, case reports, reviews, letters to the editor, meeting abstracts, and invited editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信