在梯度回声和敏感性加权磁共振成像中检测脑海绵体畸形相关的发育性静脉异常:我们可以跳过对比吗?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-13 DOI:10.1007/s00234-025-03666-2
Laurèl Rauschenbach, Alejandro N Santos, Jan Rodemerk, Hanah H Gull, Thiemo F Dinger, Adrian Engel, Maximilian Schüssler, Yan Li, Marvin Darkwah Oppong, Ramazan Jabbarli, Benedikt Frank, Michael Forsting, Karsten H Wrede, Ulrich Sure, Philipp Dammann
{"title":"在梯度回声和敏感性加权磁共振成像中检测脑海绵体畸形相关的发育性静脉异常:我们可以跳过对比吗?","authors":"Laurèl Rauschenbach, Alejandro N Santos, Jan Rodemerk, Hanah H Gull, Thiemo F Dinger, Adrian Engel, Maximilian Schüssler, Yan Li, Marvin Darkwah Oppong, Ramazan Jabbarli, Benedikt Frank, Michael Forsting, Karsten H Wrede, Ulrich Sure, Philipp Dammann","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03666-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hemosiderin-sensitive MRI sequences are commonly utilized for microbleed identification in cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM). Efficacy of susceptibility-weighted (SWI) and gradient-echo T2*-weighted imaging (GRE-T2*) sequences in detecting CCM-associated developmental venous anomalies (DVA) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional CCM database. Inclusion criteria comprised baseline characteristics and MRI datasets involving contrast-enhanced T1 (CE-T1), T2, and SWI or GRE-T2* sequences. The presence of CCM-related DVA was determined utilizing CE-T1 imaging. A subgroup of 200 patients, evenly distributed with or without DVA, underwent random selection for analysis, with 50 patients each having SWI and GRE-T2* imaging. The presence of DVA was evaluated by two blinded neuroradiologists based on SWI or GRE-T2* sequences. Interrater agreement, sensitivity, and specificity values for SWI and GRE-T2* sequences were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Imaging assessment demonstrated observer agreement in 76% of the SWI sequences (K = 0.51, p <0.001) and 82% of the GRE-T2* images (K = 0.39, p <0.001). While SWI sequences exhibited a sensitivity of 81.4% and a specificity of 60.6%, GRE-T2* sequences showed a sensitivity of 19.1% and a specificity of 97.5%. Misdiagnoses were frequent in small vessel DVAs, whereas large vessel DVAs were associated with higher diagnostic accuracy in both SWI and GRE-T2* sequences (p =0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evaluation of SWI and GRE-T2* sequences for assessing CCM-related DVA appears less effective than the routine use of CE-T1 sequences. The use of contrast agents still appears necessary for detailed diagnostics and appropriate surgery planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"2005-2013"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of cerebral cavernous malformation associated developmental venous anomalies in gradient-echo and susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: can we skip the contrast?\",\"authors\":\"Laurèl Rauschenbach, Alejandro N Santos, Jan Rodemerk, Hanah H Gull, Thiemo F Dinger, Adrian Engel, Maximilian Schüssler, Yan Li, Marvin Darkwah Oppong, Ramazan Jabbarli, Benedikt Frank, Michael Forsting, Karsten H Wrede, Ulrich Sure, Philipp Dammann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00234-025-03666-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hemosiderin-sensitive MRI sequences are commonly utilized for microbleed identification in cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM). Efficacy of susceptibility-weighted (SWI) and gradient-echo T2*-weighted imaging (GRE-T2*) sequences in detecting CCM-associated developmental venous anomalies (DVA) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional CCM database. Inclusion criteria comprised baseline characteristics and MRI datasets involving contrast-enhanced T1 (CE-T1), T2, and SWI or GRE-T2* sequences. The presence of CCM-related DVA was determined utilizing CE-T1 imaging. A subgroup of 200 patients, evenly distributed with or without DVA, underwent random selection for analysis, with 50 patients each having SWI and GRE-T2* imaging. The presence of DVA was evaluated by two blinded neuroradiologists based on SWI or GRE-T2* sequences. Interrater agreement, sensitivity, and specificity values for SWI and GRE-T2* sequences were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Imaging assessment demonstrated observer agreement in 76% of the SWI sequences (K = 0.51, p <0.001) and 82% of the GRE-T2* images (K = 0.39, p <0.001). While SWI sequences exhibited a sensitivity of 81.4% and a specificity of 60.6%, GRE-T2* sequences showed a sensitivity of 19.1% and a specificity of 97.5%. Misdiagnoses were frequent in small vessel DVAs, whereas large vessel DVAs were associated with higher diagnostic accuracy in both SWI and GRE-T2* sequences (p =0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evaluation of SWI and GRE-T2* sequences for assessing CCM-related DVA appears less effective than the routine use of CE-T1 sequences. The use of contrast agents still appears necessary for detailed diagnostics and appropriate surgery planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2005-2013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03666-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03666-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:含铁血黄素敏感MRI序列通常用于脑海绵状血管瘤(CCM)的微出血鉴别。敏感性加权(SWI)和梯度回声T2*加权成像(GRE-T2*)序列在检测ccm相关发育性静脉异常(DVA)中的有效性尚不确定。方法:我们对我们的机构CCM数据库进行了回顾性审查。纳入标准包括基线特征和MRI数据集,包括对比增强T1 (CE-T1)、T2和SWI或GRE-T2*序列。利用CE-T1成像确定ccm相关DVA的存在。随机选择200例有或无DVA的患者进行亚组分析,其中50例患者分别进行SWI和GRE-T2*成像。DVA的存在由两名盲法神经放射学家根据SWI或GRE-T2*序列进行评估。分析SWI和GRE-T2*序列的一致性、敏感性和特异性值。结果:影像学评估在76%的SWI序列中显示观察者一致(K = 0.51, p)。结论:SWI和GRE-T2*序列评估ccm相关DVA的效果不如常规使用CE-T1序列。造影剂的使用对于详细的诊断和适当的手术计划仍然是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of cerebral cavernous malformation associated developmental venous anomalies in gradient-echo and susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: can we skip the contrast?

Purpose: Hemosiderin-sensitive MRI sequences are commonly utilized for microbleed identification in cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM). Efficacy of susceptibility-weighted (SWI) and gradient-echo T2*-weighted imaging (GRE-T2*) sequences in detecting CCM-associated developmental venous anomalies (DVA) remains uncertain.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional CCM database. Inclusion criteria comprised baseline characteristics and MRI datasets involving contrast-enhanced T1 (CE-T1), T2, and SWI or GRE-T2* sequences. The presence of CCM-related DVA was determined utilizing CE-T1 imaging. A subgroup of 200 patients, evenly distributed with or without DVA, underwent random selection for analysis, with 50 patients each having SWI and GRE-T2* imaging. The presence of DVA was evaluated by two blinded neuroradiologists based on SWI or GRE-T2* sequences. Interrater agreement, sensitivity, and specificity values for SWI and GRE-T2* sequences were analyzed.

Results: Imaging assessment demonstrated observer agreement in 76% of the SWI sequences (K = 0.51, p <0.001) and 82% of the GRE-T2* images (K = 0.39, p <0.001). While SWI sequences exhibited a sensitivity of 81.4% and a specificity of 60.6%, GRE-T2* sequences showed a sensitivity of 19.1% and a specificity of 97.5%. Misdiagnoses were frequent in small vessel DVAs, whereas large vessel DVAs were associated with higher diagnostic accuracy in both SWI and GRE-T2* sequences (p =0.002).

Conclusion: Evaluation of SWI and GRE-T2* sequences for assessing CCM-related DVA appears less effective than the routine use of CE-T1 sequences. The use of contrast agents still appears necessary for detailed diagnostics and appropriate surgery planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信