急性受损组织高压氧治疗的保险范围。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Matthew J Heron, Katherine J Zhu, Annie B McVeigh, Siam K Rezwan, Carisa M Cooney, Kristen P Broderick
{"title":"急性受损组织高压氧治疗的保险范围。","authors":"Matthew J Heron, Katherine J Zhu, Annie B McVeigh, Siam K Rezwan, Carisa M Cooney, Kristen P Broderick","doi":"10.1055/a-2616-3981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Beyond its indication for chronic wounds, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunct to managing acutely compromised grafts and flaps. Because physicians have reported challenges obtaining insurance coverage for HBOT, this cross-sectional analysis reviews policy requirements and presents an algorithm to enhance the odds of successful reimbursement.We identified the 60 largest health insurers by market share and enrollment and collected their policies on HBOT. We then conducted a dual, blind extraction of policy details (e.g., continuing and prior authorization, documentation, treatment guidelines) and compiled these data into an insurance reimbursement algorithm to assist prescribing physicians.Fifty-three health insurers (88.3%) had policies on HBOT; 47.2% (<i>n</i> = 25) required prior authorization, and 61.9% (<i>n</i> = 13) required continuing authorization after a set number of HBOT sessions (median: 20 sessions, interquartile range [IQR]: 12-30 sessions). Thirty-eight (71.7%) permitted clinical judgment when defining flap or graft \"compromise,\" and 35.7% (<i>n</i> = 15) considered any pressure greater than 1 atmosphere absolute to be \"hyperbaric.\" Twenty-two insurers (41.5%) outlined documentation requirements for HBOT reimbursement; the most often requested documentation were medical records (<i>n</i> = 19, 86.4%), signs of healing (<i>n</i> = 12, 54.5%), images (<i>n</i> = 10, 45.5%), treatment goals (<i>n</i> = 8, 36.4%), and dive parameters (<i>n</i> = 5, 22.7%).Most insured Americans are eligible for 12 sessions of HBOT; however, medical necessity must be established early and reconfirmed often to increase the likelihood of reimbursement. Additionally, prescribing physicians should be aware that insurers differ in their documentation, prior authorization, and continuing authorization requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insurance Coverage for Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Acutely Compromised Tissues.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew J Heron, Katherine J Zhu, Annie B McVeigh, Siam K Rezwan, Carisa M Cooney, Kristen P Broderick\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2616-3981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Beyond its indication for chronic wounds, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunct to managing acutely compromised grafts and flaps. Because physicians have reported challenges obtaining insurance coverage for HBOT, this cross-sectional analysis reviews policy requirements and presents an algorithm to enhance the odds of successful reimbursement.We identified the 60 largest health insurers by market share and enrollment and collected their policies on HBOT. We then conducted a dual, blind extraction of policy details (e.g., continuing and prior authorization, documentation, treatment guidelines) and compiled these data into an insurance reimbursement algorithm to assist prescribing physicians.Fifty-three health insurers (88.3%) had policies on HBOT; 47.2% (<i>n</i> = 25) required prior authorization, and 61.9% (<i>n</i> = 13) required continuing authorization after a set number of HBOT sessions (median: 20 sessions, interquartile range [IQR]: 12-30 sessions). Thirty-eight (71.7%) permitted clinical judgment when defining flap or graft \\\"compromise,\\\" and 35.7% (<i>n</i> = 15) considered any pressure greater than 1 atmosphere absolute to be \\\"hyperbaric.\\\" Twenty-two insurers (41.5%) outlined documentation requirements for HBOT reimbursement; the most often requested documentation were medical records (<i>n</i> = 19, 86.4%), signs of healing (<i>n</i> = 12, 54.5%), images (<i>n</i> = 10, 45.5%), treatment goals (<i>n</i> = 8, 36.4%), and dive parameters (<i>n</i> = 5, 22.7%).Most insured Americans are eligible for 12 sessions of HBOT; however, medical necessity must be established early and reconfirmed often to increase the likelihood of reimbursement. Additionally, prescribing physicians should be aware that insurers differ in their documentation, prior authorization, and continuing authorization requirements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2616-3981\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2616-3981","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

除了慢性伤口适应症外,高压氧治疗(HBOT)是治疗急性受损移植物和皮瓣的辅助手段。由于医生报告了获得HBOT保险的挑战,本横断面分析回顾了政策要求,并提出了一种提高成功报销几率的算法。我们根据市场份额和登记人数确定了60家最大的健康保险公司,并收集了他们在HBOT上的政策。然后,我们进行了双重盲提取政策细节(例如,持续和事先授权,文件,治疗指南),并将这些数据汇编成保险报销算法,以协助处方医生。53家医疗保险公司(88.3%)有HBOT保单;47.2% (n = 25)的患者需要事先授权,61.9% (n = 13)的患者需要在一定次数的HBOT治疗后继续授权(中位数:20次,四分位数间距[IQR]: 12-30次)。38例(71.7%)允许临床判断皮瓣或移植物是否“受损”,35.7% (n = 15)认为任何大于1大气压的压力都是“高压”。22家保险公司(41.5%)概述了HBOT报销的文件要求;最常要求的文件是医疗记录(n = 19, 86.4%)、愈合迹象(n = 12, 54.5%)、图像(n = 10, 45.5%)、治疗目标(n = 8, 36.4%)和潜水参数(n = 5, 22.7%)。大多数参保的美国人有资格参加12次HBOT;但是,必须尽早确定医疗需要,并经常予以确认,以增加报销的可能性。此外,开处方的医生应该意识到保险公司在文件、事先授权和持续授权要求方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insurance Coverage for Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Acutely Compromised Tissues.

Beyond its indication for chronic wounds, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunct to managing acutely compromised grafts and flaps. Because physicians have reported challenges obtaining insurance coverage for HBOT, this cross-sectional analysis reviews policy requirements and presents an algorithm to enhance the odds of successful reimbursement.We identified the 60 largest health insurers by market share and enrollment and collected their policies on HBOT. We then conducted a dual, blind extraction of policy details (e.g., continuing and prior authorization, documentation, treatment guidelines) and compiled these data into an insurance reimbursement algorithm to assist prescribing physicians.Fifty-three health insurers (88.3%) had policies on HBOT; 47.2% (n = 25) required prior authorization, and 61.9% (n = 13) required continuing authorization after a set number of HBOT sessions (median: 20 sessions, interquartile range [IQR]: 12-30 sessions). Thirty-eight (71.7%) permitted clinical judgment when defining flap or graft "compromise," and 35.7% (n = 15) considered any pressure greater than 1 atmosphere absolute to be "hyperbaric." Twenty-two insurers (41.5%) outlined documentation requirements for HBOT reimbursement; the most often requested documentation were medical records (n = 19, 86.4%), signs of healing (n = 12, 54.5%), images (n = 10, 45.5%), treatment goals (n = 8, 36.4%), and dive parameters (n = 5, 22.7%).Most insured Americans are eligible for 12 sessions of HBOT; however, medical necessity must be established early and reconfirmed often to increase the likelihood of reimbursement. Additionally, prescribing physicians should be aware that insurers differ in their documentation, prior authorization, and continuing authorization requirements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信