紧张症伴或不伴谵妄的电图特征。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
James Luccarelli, Joshua R Smith, Niels Turley, Jonathan P Rogers, Haoqi Sun, Samuel I Kohrman, Gregory Fricchione, M Brandon Westover
{"title":"紧张症伴或不伴谵妄的电图特征。","authors":"James Luccarelli, Joshua R Smith, Niels Turley, Jonathan P Rogers, Haoqi Sun, Samuel I Kohrman, Gregory Fricchione, M Brandon Westover","doi":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Catatonia is an underdiagnosed disorder characterized by speech and motor abnormalities. EEG examinations may improve the accuracy of a catatonia diagnosis, but clinical and electrographic correlations have not been established. The authors describe catatonic features and EEG findings in a large multisite retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical records in two health care systems were searched for patients with an EEG recording and a catatonia assessment with the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale conducted within 24 hours of each other. Included patients were retrospectively screened for delirium through a chart-based assessment. Augmented inverse propensity weighting (AIPW) was used to estimate the causal effects of delirium and catatonia on the presence of an abnormal EEG finding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 178 patients met inclusion criteria, 144 (81%) of whom had catatonia. Among the patients with catatonia, 43% also had delirium. EEG abnormalities were present among 43% of patients with catatonia, including 28% of patients with catatonia without delirium and 69% of the patients with co-occurring catatonia and delirium. Individual catatonic signs and EEG abnormalities showed only a weak correlation. In AIPW models, a delirium diagnosis was associated with significantly higher odds for an abnormal EEG finding (OR=6.75; 95% CI=2.83-16.14), whereas a diagnosis of catatonia was not (OR=1.83, 95% CI=0.79-4.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EEG abnormalities are common among individuals with catatonia, but these are difficult to disentangle from abnormalities resulting from co-occurring delirium. Further research is needed to define the role of EEG examinations in the assessments of catatonia and delirium.</p>","PeriodicalId":16559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"appineuropsych20240215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrographic Features of Catatonia With or Without Comorbid Delirium.\",\"authors\":\"James Luccarelli, Joshua R Smith, Niels Turley, Jonathan P Rogers, Haoqi Sun, Samuel I Kohrman, Gregory Fricchione, M Brandon Westover\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Catatonia is an underdiagnosed disorder characterized by speech and motor abnormalities. EEG examinations may improve the accuracy of a catatonia diagnosis, but clinical and electrographic correlations have not been established. The authors describe catatonic features and EEG findings in a large multisite retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical records in two health care systems were searched for patients with an EEG recording and a catatonia assessment with the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale conducted within 24 hours of each other. Included patients were retrospectively screened for delirium through a chart-based assessment. Augmented inverse propensity weighting (AIPW) was used to estimate the causal effects of delirium and catatonia on the presence of an abnormal EEG finding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 178 patients met inclusion criteria, 144 (81%) of whom had catatonia. Among the patients with catatonia, 43% also had delirium. EEG abnormalities were present among 43% of patients with catatonia, including 28% of patients with catatonia without delirium and 69% of the patients with co-occurring catatonia and delirium. Individual catatonic signs and EEG abnormalities showed only a weak correlation. In AIPW models, a delirium diagnosis was associated with significantly higher odds for an abnormal EEG finding (OR=6.75; 95% CI=2.83-16.14), whereas a diagnosis of catatonia was not (OR=1.83, 95% CI=0.79-4.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EEG abnormalities are common among individuals with catatonia, but these are difficult to disentangle from abnormalities resulting from co-occurring delirium. Further research is needed to define the role of EEG examinations in the assessments of catatonia and delirium.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"appineuropsych20240215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240215\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240215","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:紧张症是一种以言语和运动异常为特征的未被诊断的疾病。脑电图检查可以提高紧张症诊断的准确性,但临床和电图相关性尚未建立。作者描述了一个大型多地点回顾性队列的紧张性特征和脑电图结果。方法:检索两所卫生保健系统的临床记录,收集脑电图记录和使用Bush-Francis紧张症评定量表进行紧张症评定的患者,时间间隔为24小时。通过基于图表的评估回顾性筛选纳入的患者是否患有谵妄。增强逆倾向加权(AIPW)被用来估计谵妄和紧张症对脑电图异常发现的因果影响。结果:178例患者符合纳入标准,其中144例(81%)有紧张症。在紧张症患者中,43%伴有谵妄。43%的紧张症患者存在脑电图异常,其中28%的紧张症无谵妄,69%的紧张症伴谵妄。个体紧张症状与脑电图异常的相关性较弱。在AIPW模型中,谵妄诊断与异常脑电图发现的几率显著增加相关(OR=6.75;95% CI=2.83-16.14),而紧张症的诊断则没有(OR=1.83, 95% CI=0.79-4.24)。结论:脑电图异常在紧张症患者中很常见,但这些异常很难与同时发生的谵妄引起的异常区分开来。需要进一步的研究来确定脑电图检查在评估紧张症和谵妄中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electrographic Features of Catatonia With or Without Comorbid Delirium.

Objective: Catatonia is an underdiagnosed disorder characterized by speech and motor abnormalities. EEG examinations may improve the accuracy of a catatonia diagnosis, but clinical and electrographic correlations have not been established. The authors describe catatonic features and EEG findings in a large multisite retrospective cohort.

Methods: The clinical records in two health care systems were searched for patients with an EEG recording and a catatonia assessment with the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale conducted within 24 hours of each other. Included patients were retrospectively screened for delirium through a chart-based assessment. Augmented inverse propensity weighting (AIPW) was used to estimate the causal effects of delirium and catatonia on the presence of an abnormal EEG finding.

Results: Overall, 178 patients met inclusion criteria, 144 (81%) of whom had catatonia. Among the patients with catatonia, 43% also had delirium. EEG abnormalities were present among 43% of patients with catatonia, including 28% of patients with catatonia without delirium and 69% of the patients with co-occurring catatonia and delirium. Individual catatonic signs and EEG abnormalities showed only a weak correlation. In AIPW models, a delirium diagnosis was associated with significantly higher odds for an abnormal EEG finding (OR=6.75; 95% CI=2.83-16.14), whereas a diagnosis of catatonia was not (OR=1.83, 95% CI=0.79-4.24).

Conclusions: EEG abnormalities are common among individuals with catatonia, but these are difficult to disentangle from abnormalities resulting from co-occurring delirium. Further research is needed to define the role of EEG examinations in the assessments of catatonia and delirium.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
67
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official Journal of the American Neuropsychiatric Association, the premier North American organization of clinicians, scientists, and educators specializing in behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and the clinical neurosciences, the Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences (JNCN) aims to publish works that advance the science of brain-behavior relationships, the care of persons and families affected by neurodevelopmental, acquired neurological, and neurodegenerative conditions, and education and training in behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry. JNCN publishes peer-reviewed articles on the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral manifestations of neurological conditions, the structural and functional neuroanatomy of idiopathic psychiatric disorders, and the clinical and educational applications and public health implications of scientific advances in these areas. The Journal features systematic reviews and meta-analyses, narrative reviews, original research articles, scholarly considerations of treatment and educational challenges in behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry, analyses and commentaries on advances and emerging trends in the field, international perspectives on neuropsychiatry, opinions and introspections, case reports that inform on the structural and functional bases of neuropsychiatric conditions, and classic pieces from the field’s rich history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信