ESPGHAN特别兴趣小组对添加后生物制剂的婴儿配方奶粉的肠道微生物群和健康结果的修改进行技术审查。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hania Szajewska, Ener Cagri Dinleyici, Alfredo Guarino, Alexis Mosca, Raanan Shamir, Yvan Vandenplas
{"title":"ESPGHAN特别兴趣小组对添加后生物制剂的婴儿配方奶粉的肠道微生物群和健康结果的修改进行技术审查。","authors":"Hania Szajewska, Ener Cagri Dinleyici, Alfredo Guarino, Alexis Mosca, Raanan Shamir, Yvan Vandenplas","doi":"10.1002/jpn3.70112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This technical review, one of five developed by the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Special Interest Group (SIG) on Gut Microbiota and Modifications (GMM), supports the creation of a Paper on the use of biotic-supplemented formulas, including those containing postbiotics. Postbiotics are defined as inanimate [i.e., dead, nonviable] microorganisms and/or their components that confer health benefits to the host. This review focuses on the clinical outcomes of infant formulas supplemented with postbiotics. The SIG-GMM conducted technical review to evaluate the clinical outcomes of postbiotic-supplemented infant formulas in healthy infants (0-12 months) published before 2024. Based on the findings of a technical review, all members of the SIG voted anonymously on statements related to clinical outcomes with a score between 0 and 9. A score higher than 6 indicated agreements. A statement was rejected if <75% of the members agreed. Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. The postbiotics studied so far showed no difference compared to the control formula in outcomes such as anthropometric data, gastrointestinal symptoms, stool characteristics, allergy, infections, tolerability and safety. The RCTs evaluating postbiotics added to infant formula are heterogeneous due to differences in study design, variations in postbiotics and durations of interventions. The studies were powered to demonstrate and did show that there was good tolerance and adequate, safe growth comparable to nonsupplemented formula in presumed healthy infants. This technical review provides the foundation for recommendations on the use of postbiotic-supplemented infant formulas in healthy infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":16694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical review by the ESPGHAN special interest group on gut microbiota and modifications on the health outcomes of infant formula supplemented with postbiotics.\",\"authors\":\"Hania Szajewska, Ener Cagri Dinleyici, Alfredo Guarino, Alexis Mosca, Raanan Shamir, Yvan Vandenplas\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jpn3.70112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This technical review, one of five developed by the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Special Interest Group (SIG) on Gut Microbiota and Modifications (GMM), supports the creation of a Paper on the use of biotic-supplemented formulas, including those containing postbiotics. Postbiotics are defined as inanimate [i.e., dead, nonviable] microorganisms and/or their components that confer health benefits to the host. This review focuses on the clinical outcomes of infant formulas supplemented with postbiotics. The SIG-GMM conducted technical review to evaluate the clinical outcomes of postbiotic-supplemented infant formulas in healthy infants (0-12 months) published before 2024. Based on the findings of a technical review, all members of the SIG voted anonymously on statements related to clinical outcomes with a score between 0 and 9. A score higher than 6 indicated agreements. A statement was rejected if <75% of the members agreed. Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. The postbiotics studied so far showed no difference compared to the control formula in outcomes such as anthropometric data, gastrointestinal symptoms, stool characteristics, allergy, infections, tolerability and safety. The RCTs evaluating postbiotics added to infant formula are heterogeneous due to differences in study design, variations in postbiotics and durations of interventions. The studies were powered to demonstrate and did show that there was good tolerance and adequate, safe growth comparable to nonsupplemented formula in presumed healthy infants. This technical review provides the foundation for recommendations on the use of postbiotic-supplemented infant formulas in healthy infants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.70112\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.70112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该技术综述是欧洲儿科胃肠病学肝病学和营养学会(ESPGHAN)肠道微生物群和修饰(GMM)特别兴趣小组(SIG)开发的五项技术综述之一,支持撰写一篇关于生物补充配方(包括那些含有后生物制剂的配方)使用的论文。后生物被定义为对宿主有益的无生命(即死亡的、不能存活的)微生物和/或其成分。这篇综述的重点是婴儿配方奶粉中添加后生物制剂的临床结果。SIG-GMM进行了技术审查,以评估2024年前发表的生物后补充婴儿配方奶粉在健康婴儿(0-12个月)中的临床结果。根据技术审查的结果,SIG的所有成员对与临床结果相关的陈述进行匿名投票,得分在0到9之间。分数高于6表示同意。一份声明被拒绝了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technical review by the ESPGHAN special interest group on gut microbiota and modifications on the health outcomes of infant formula supplemented with postbiotics.

This technical review, one of five developed by the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Special Interest Group (SIG) on Gut Microbiota and Modifications (GMM), supports the creation of a Paper on the use of biotic-supplemented formulas, including those containing postbiotics. Postbiotics are defined as inanimate [i.e., dead, nonviable] microorganisms and/or their components that confer health benefits to the host. This review focuses on the clinical outcomes of infant formulas supplemented with postbiotics. The SIG-GMM conducted technical review to evaluate the clinical outcomes of postbiotic-supplemented infant formulas in healthy infants (0-12 months) published before 2024. Based on the findings of a technical review, all members of the SIG voted anonymously on statements related to clinical outcomes with a score between 0 and 9. A score higher than 6 indicated agreements. A statement was rejected if <75% of the members agreed. Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. The postbiotics studied so far showed no difference compared to the control formula in outcomes such as anthropometric data, gastrointestinal symptoms, stool characteristics, allergy, infections, tolerability and safety. The RCTs evaluating postbiotics added to infant formula are heterogeneous due to differences in study design, variations in postbiotics and durations of interventions. The studies were powered to demonstrate and did show that there was good tolerance and adequate, safe growth comparable to nonsupplemented formula in presumed healthy infants. This technical review provides the foundation for recommendations on the use of postbiotic-supplemented infant formulas in healthy infants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
467
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (JPGN) provides a forum for original papers and reviews dealing with pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, including normal and abnormal functions of the alimentary tract and its associated organs, including the salivary glands, pancreas, gallbladder, and liver. Particular emphasis is on development and its relation to infant and childhood nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信