自由呼吸混合技术在0.55 T的同时形态和定量腹部成像。

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mahesh B Keerthivasan, Mary Bruno, Eddy Solomon, Ryan Brown, Douglas Brantner, Kai Tobias Block, Hersh Chandarana
{"title":"自由呼吸混合技术在0.55 T的同时形态和定量腹部成像。","authors":"Mahesh B Keerthivasan, Mary Bruno, Eddy Solomon, Ryan Brown, Douglas Brantner, Kai Tobias Block, Hersh Chandarana","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Quantitative proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* estimation at lower field strengths, such as 0.55 T, is challenging due to lower signal-to-noise ratio, reduced fat water chemical shift, and increased T2* relaxation times. In this study, we propose a 3D hybrid technique for abdominal imaging at 0.55 T that enables the simultaneous acquisition of T2-weighted and T1-weighted images and quantification of fat fraction and R2* parameters.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Numerical simulations were performed to optimize a prototype radial hybrid turbo spin echo gradient echo (TSE-GRE) acquisition scheme for improved PDFF and R2* estimation accuracy. Phantom imaging experiments with and without motion were performed to evaluate the sensitivity of the estimation to external motion. Eleven volunteers were imaged on a prototype 0.55 T system. Data were acquired using the proposed technique under free-breathing conditions, and motion-compensated reconstruction was performed using the respiratory signal from a pilot-tone device. Image contrast and estimation performance were compared with conventional acquisition schemes in vitro and in vivo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Numerical simulations indicated R2* estimation accuracy was more sensitive to the choice of echo time compared with PDFF. Performing motion compensation reduced the mean error in R2* from 24 to 5 s-1 while the mean error in PDFF only reduced from 2.7% to 1.6%. The proposed technique generated T2-weighted images with comparable relative liver-spleen contrast as conventional imaging and there were no significant differences (P>0.05) in the PDFF and R2* values estimated from the hybrid technique compared with conventional multi-echo GRE. Further, the free-breathing acquisition allowed improved slice coverage while overcoming breath-hold limitations of conventional acquisition schemes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of a hybrid TSE-GRE acquisition technique can allow simultaneous morphological and quantitative PDFF and R2* estimation at 0.55 T under free-breathing conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Free-Breathing Hybrid Technique for Simultaneous Morphological and Quantitative Abdominal Imaging at 0.55 T.\",\"authors\":\"Mahesh B Keerthivasan, Mary Bruno, Eddy Solomon, Ryan Brown, Douglas Brantner, Kai Tobias Block, Hersh Chandarana\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Quantitative proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* estimation at lower field strengths, such as 0.55 T, is challenging due to lower signal-to-noise ratio, reduced fat water chemical shift, and increased T2* relaxation times. In this study, we propose a 3D hybrid technique for abdominal imaging at 0.55 T that enables the simultaneous acquisition of T2-weighted and T1-weighted images and quantification of fat fraction and R2* parameters.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Numerical simulations were performed to optimize a prototype radial hybrid turbo spin echo gradient echo (TSE-GRE) acquisition scheme for improved PDFF and R2* estimation accuracy. Phantom imaging experiments with and without motion were performed to evaluate the sensitivity of the estimation to external motion. Eleven volunteers were imaged on a prototype 0.55 T system. Data were acquired using the proposed technique under free-breathing conditions, and motion-compensated reconstruction was performed using the respiratory signal from a pilot-tone device. Image contrast and estimation performance were compared with conventional acquisition schemes in vitro and in vivo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Numerical simulations indicated R2* estimation accuracy was more sensitive to the choice of echo time compared with PDFF. Performing motion compensation reduced the mean error in R2* from 24 to 5 s-1 while the mean error in PDFF only reduced from 2.7% to 1.6%. The proposed technique generated T2-weighted images with comparable relative liver-spleen contrast as conventional imaging and there were no significant differences (P>0.05) in the PDFF and R2* values estimated from the hybrid technique compared with conventional multi-echo GRE. Further, the free-breathing acquisition allowed improved slice coverage while overcoming breath-hold limitations of conventional acquisition schemes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of a hybrid TSE-GRE acquisition technique can allow simultaneous morphological and quantitative PDFF and R2* estimation at 0.55 T under free-breathing conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001214\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001214","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在较低场强(如0.55 T)下,定量质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)和R2*估计具有挑战性,因为信噪比较低,脂肪水化学位移减少,T2*弛豫时间增加。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种用于0.55 T腹部成像的3D混合技术,可以同时获取t2加权和t1加权图像,并量化脂肪分数和R2*参数。材料和方法:通过数值模拟优化了一种原型radial混合涡轮自旋回波梯度回波(TSE-GRE)采集方案,以提高PDFF和R2*估计精度。通过有运动和无运动的幻影成像实验来评估估计对外部运动的敏感性。11名志愿者在0.55 T的原型系统上进行了成像。在自由呼吸条件下使用所提出的技术获取数据,并使用来自导音装置的呼吸信号进行运动补偿重建。在体外和体内比较了常规采集方案的图像对比度和估计性能。结果:数值模拟表明,与PDFF相比,R2*估计精度对回波时间的选择更为敏感。运动补偿将R2*中的平均误差从24 s-1降低到5 s-1,而PDFF中的平均误差仅从2.7%降低到1.6%。该技术生成的t2加权图像与常规成像具有相当的肝脾相对对比度,混合技术估计的PDFF和R2*值与常规多回声GRE相比无显著差异(P>0.05)。此外,自由呼吸采集可以改善切片覆盖范围,同时克服传统采集方案的屏气限制。结论:使用TSE-GRE混合采集技术可以在自由呼吸条件下在0.55 T下同时进行形态学和定量PDFF和R2*估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Free-Breathing Hybrid Technique for Simultaneous Morphological and Quantitative Abdominal Imaging at 0.55 T.

Objectives: Quantitative proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* estimation at lower field strengths, such as 0.55 T, is challenging due to lower signal-to-noise ratio, reduced fat water chemical shift, and increased T2* relaxation times. In this study, we propose a 3D hybrid technique for abdominal imaging at 0.55 T that enables the simultaneous acquisition of T2-weighted and T1-weighted images and quantification of fat fraction and R2* parameters.

Materials and methods: Numerical simulations were performed to optimize a prototype radial hybrid turbo spin echo gradient echo (TSE-GRE) acquisition scheme for improved PDFF and R2* estimation accuracy. Phantom imaging experiments with and without motion were performed to evaluate the sensitivity of the estimation to external motion. Eleven volunteers were imaged on a prototype 0.55 T system. Data were acquired using the proposed technique under free-breathing conditions, and motion-compensated reconstruction was performed using the respiratory signal from a pilot-tone device. Image contrast and estimation performance were compared with conventional acquisition schemes in vitro and in vivo.

Results: Numerical simulations indicated R2* estimation accuracy was more sensitive to the choice of echo time compared with PDFF. Performing motion compensation reduced the mean error in R2* from 24 to 5 s-1 while the mean error in PDFF only reduced from 2.7% to 1.6%. The proposed technique generated T2-weighted images with comparable relative liver-spleen contrast as conventional imaging and there were no significant differences (P>0.05) in the PDFF and R2* values estimated from the hybrid technique compared with conventional multi-echo GRE. Further, the free-breathing acquisition allowed improved slice coverage while overcoming breath-hold limitations of conventional acquisition schemes.

Conclusions: The use of a hybrid TSE-GRE acquisition technique can allow simultaneous morphological and quantitative PDFF and R2* estimation at 0.55 T under free-breathing conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信