2型糖尿病与子痫前期的因果关系:一项双向双样本孟德尔随机研究

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
International Journal of Women's Health Pub Date : 2025-06-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S517371
Xuwen Song, Yikang Wang, Pengsheng Li, Yafei Wang, Xinghui Wen, Qingwen Nie, Wanlu An, Huan Wang, Fang He
{"title":"2型糖尿病与子痫前期的因果关系:一项双向双样本孟德尔随机研究","authors":"Xuwen Song, Yikang Wang, Pengsheng Li, Yafei Wang, Xinghui Wen, Qingwen Nie, Wanlu An, Huan Wang, Fang He","doi":"10.2147/IJWH.S517371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observational epidemiologic investigations into the link between diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia (PE) have been conducted, but genetic evidence is still lacking. We utilized a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to shed light on the potential influence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on PE at the genetic prediction level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a two-sample bidirectional MR analysis, utilizing genetic variants associated with T2DM (N=461,920) and PE (N=219,817) from the largest available genome-wide association studies. Using inverse variance weighting (IVW) and five validated approaches-MR-Egger, MR-RAPS, ConMix, weighted median, and weighted mode-we derived a potential causal association between T2DM and PE. The relationship between PE and T2DM was explored using reverse MR analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two-sample MR analysis indicated a causal link between T2DM and PE, with an odds ratio of 1.10 (95% CI, 1.02-1.18; P=0.01). The weighted mode method yielded an odds ratio of 1.22 (95% CI, 1.06-1.40; P=0.019), and the weighted median method produced an odds ratio of 1.19 (95% CI, 1.04-1.36; P=0.022). However, no significant association was detected in the MR-Egger analysis. Heterogeneity was noted in the analysis of T2DM and PE, but no significant horizontal pleiotropy was observed. The results of the reverse MR analysis indicated no significant causal association between PE and T2DM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the first time, MR analysis showed a positive causal link from T2DM to PE, but not vice versa. The limited number of SNPs in reverse analysis may affect reliability. Future studies should use more instrumental variables to strengthen findings. Further experiments are also needed to explore underlying mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":14356,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Women's Health","volume":"17 ","pages":"1725-1737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal Relationship Between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Preeclampsia: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomized Study.\",\"authors\":\"Xuwen Song, Yikang Wang, Pengsheng Li, Yafei Wang, Xinghui Wen, Qingwen Nie, Wanlu An, Huan Wang, Fang He\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IJWH.S517371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observational epidemiologic investigations into the link between diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia (PE) have been conducted, but genetic evidence is still lacking. We utilized a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to shed light on the potential influence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on PE at the genetic prediction level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a two-sample bidirectional MR analysis, utilizing genetic variants associated with T2DM (N=461,920) and PE (N=219,817) from the largest available genome-wide association studies. Using inverse variance weighting (IVW) and five validated approaches-MR-Egger, MR-RAPS, ConMix, weighted median, and weighted mode-we derived a potential causal association between T2DM and PE. The relationship between PE and T2DM was explored using reverse MR analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two-sample MR analysis indicated a causal link between T2DM and PE, with an odds ratio of 1.10 (95% CI, 1.02-1.18; P=0.01). The weighted mode method yielded an odds ratio of 1.22 (95% CI, 1.06-1.40; P=0.019), and the weighted median method produced an odds ratio of 1.19 (95% CI, 1.04-1.36; P=0.022). However, no significant association was detected in the MR-Egger analysis. Heterogeneity was noted in the analysis of T2DM and PE, but no significant horizontal pleiotropy was observed. The results of the reverse MR analysis indicated no significant causal association between PE and T2DM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the first time, MR analysis showed a positive causal link from T2DM to PE, but not vice versa. The limited number of SNPs in reverse analysis may affect reliability. Future studies should use more instrumental variables to strengthen findings. Further experiments are also needed to explore underlying mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Women's Health\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"1725-1737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161146/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Women's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S517371\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S517371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对糖尿病和子痫前期(PE)之间的联系进行了观察性流行病学调查,但仍缺乏遗传证据。我们利用双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,在遗传预测水平上揭示2型糖尿病(T2DM)对PE的潜在影响。方法:我们进行了一项双样本双向MR分析,利用与T2DM (N=461,920)和PE (N=219,817)相关的遗传变异,这些遗传变异来自最大的全基因组关联研究。使用逆方差加权(IVW)和五种有效的方法(mr - egger、MR-RAPS、ConMix、加权中位数和加权模型),我们推导出T2DM和PE之间的潜在因果关系。利用反向MR分析探讨PE与T2DM的关系。结果:两样本MR分析显示T2DM和PE之间存在因果关系,比值比为1.10 (95% CI, 1.02-1.18;P = 0.01)。加权模式法的优势比为1.22 (95% CI, 1.06-1.40;P=0.019),加权中位数法的优势比为1.19 (95% CI, 1.04-1.36;P = 0.022)。然而,在MR-Egger分析中没有发现显著的关联。在T2DM和PE的分析中发现异质性,但未观察到明显的水平多效性。反向MR分析结果显示,PE和T2DM之间没有显著的因果关系。结论:MR分析首次显示T2DM与PE呈正相关,而非相反。反向分析中snp数量有限,可能影响可靠性。未来的研究应该使用更多的工具变量来加强研究结果。还需要进一步的实验来探索潜在的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causal Relationship Between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Preeclampsia: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomized Study.

Background: Observational epidemiologic investigations into the link between diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia (PE) have been conducted, but genetic evidence is still lacking. We utilized a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to shed light on the potential influence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on PE at the genetic prediction level.

Methods: We carried out a two-sample bidirectional MR analysis, utilizing genetic variants associated with T2DM (N=461,920) and PE (N=219,817) from the largest available genome-wide association studies. Using inverse variance weighting (IVW) and five validated approaches-MR-Egger, MR-RAPS, ConMix, weighted median, and weighted mode-we derived a potential causal association between T2DM and PE. The relationship between PE and T2DM was explored using reverse MR analysis.

Results: The two-sample MR analysis indicated a causal link between T2DM and PE, with an odds ratio of 1.10 (95% CI, 1.02-1.18; P=0.01). The weighted mode method yielded an odds ratio of 1.22 (95% CI, 1.06-1.40; P=0.019), and the weighted median method produced an odds ratio of 1.19 (95% CI, 1.04-1.36; P=0.022). However, no significant association was detected in the MR-Egger analysis. Heterogeneity was noted in the analysis of T2DM and PE, but no significant horizontal pleiotropy was observed. The results of the reverse MR analysis indicated no significant causal association between PE and T2DM.

Conclusion: For the first time, MR analysis showed a positive causal link from T2DM to PE, but not vice versa. The limited number of SNPs in reverse analysis may affect reliability. Future studies should use more instrumental variables to strengthen findings. Further experiments are also needed to explore underlying mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Women's Health
International Journal of Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Women''s Health is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of women''s healthcare including gynecology, obstetrics, and breast cancer. Subject areas include: Chronic conditions including cancers of various organs specific and not specific to women Migraine, headaches, arthritis, osteoporosis Endocrine and autoimmune syndromes - asthma, multiple sclerosis, lupus, diabetes Sexual and reproductive health including fertility patterns and emerging technologies to address infertility Infectious disease with chronic sequelae including HIV/AIDS, HPV, PID, and other STDs Psychological and psychosocial conditions - depression across the life span, substance abuse, domestic violence Health maintenance among aging females - factors affecting the quality of life including physical, social and mental issues Avenues for health promotion and disease prevention across the life span Male vs female incidence comparisons for conditions that affect both genders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信