{"title":"股骨颈粉碎性骨折(FNF)的DHS与腓骨支撑移植物是否更好?新型植入股骨颈系统的对比分析。","authors":"Purnaganapathi Sundaram Velmurugesan, Asif Imran, Nagashree Vasudeva, Agraharam Devendra, Jayaramaraju Dheenadhayalan, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran","doi":"10.1007/s43465-025-01389-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The dynamic hip screw with fibular strut graft (DHS-FG) is a treatment method for femoral neck fractures (FNF) with multiple cortex comminution. Femoral neck systems (FNS) improve stability and prevent excessive neck shortening in FNFs. However, no comparative studies exist to determine method superiority. This study assesses the effectiveness and complications of DHS-FG versus FNS in treating comminuted FNFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of 50 patients (age 18-50) admitted to our institution with comminuted FNFs from January 2015 to March 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups: DHS-FG (21 patients) and FNS (29 patients). Comparison parameters included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications (nonunion, neck shortening, avascular necrosis). Patient-reported outcomes were measured using Harris Hip Score at final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We followed all 50 patients for 24-72 months (mean 30 ± 2.07 months). There were no significant differences between the groups in age, gender, fracture classification, postoperative neck shaft angle, and tip-apex distance. However, the union rate differed significantly between DHS-FG and FNS groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Significant differences were also observed in surgical time (100 ± 9 vs. 76 ± 23 min), blood loss (370 ± 31 vs. 231 ± 123 ml), and complications (3 [14.2%] vs. 10 [34.4%]) in DHS-FG and FNS groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In comminuted FNFs, DHS-FG demonstrated superior union rates and lower complication rates than FNS. DHS-FG may be an effective treatment option for this fracture type, requiring further research to explore potential benefits and limitations of FNS in this context.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p><p><strong>Level of clinical care: </strong>Level I Tertiary trauma centre.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"59 6","pages":"824-832"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12151948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is DHS with Fibular Strut Graft Superior for the Fixation of Comminuted Femoral Neck Fractures (FNF)? A Comparative Analysis with New Implant Femoral Neck System.\",\"authors\":\"Purnaganapathi Sundaram Velmurugesan, Asif Imran, Nagashree Vasudeva, Agraharam Devendra, Jayaramaraju Dheenadhayalan, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43465-025-01389-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The dynamic hip screw with fibular strut graft (DHS-FG) is a treatment method for femoral neck fractures (FNF) with multiple cortex comminution. Femoral neck systems (FNS) improve stability and prevent excessive neck shortening in FNFs. However, no comparative studies exist to determine method superiority. This study assesses the effectiveness and complications of DHS-FG versus FNS in treating comminuted FNFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of 50 patients (age 18-50) admitted to our institution with comminuted FNFs from January 2015 to March 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups: DHS-FG (21 patients) and FNS (29 patients). Comparison parameters included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications (nonunion, neck shortening, avascular necrosis). Patient-reported outcomes were measured using Harris Hip Score at final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We followed all 50 patients for 24-72 months (mean 30 ± 2.07 months). There were no significant differences between the groups in age, gender, fracture classification, postoperative neck shaft angle, and tip-apex distance. However, the union rate differed significantly between DHS-FG and FNS groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Significant differences were also observed in surgical time (100 ± 9 vs. 76 ± 23 min), blood loss (370 ± 31 vs. 231 ± 123 ml), and complications (3 [14.2%] vs. 10 [34.4%]) in DHS-FG and FNS groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In comminuted FNFs, DHS-FG demonstrated superior union rates and lower complication rates than FNS. DHS-FG may be an effective treatment option for this fracture type, requiring further research to explore potential benefits and limitations of FNS in this context.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p><p><strong>Level of clinical care: </strong>Level I Tertiary trauma centre.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"59 6\",\"pages\":\"824-832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12151948/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01389-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01389-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is DHS with Fibular Strut Graft Superior for the Fixation of Comminuted Femoral Neck Fractures (FNF)? A Comparative Analysis with New Implant Femoral Neck System.
Purpose: The dynamic hip screw with fibular strut graft (DHS-FG) is a treatment method for femoral neck fractures (FNF) with multiple cortex comminution. Femoral neck systems (FNS) improve stability and prevent excessive neck shortening in FNFs. However, no comparative studies exist to determine method superiority. This study assesses the effectiveness and complications of DHS-FG versus FNS in treating comminuted FNFs.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of 50 patients (age 18-50) admitted to our institution with comminuted FNFs from January 2015 to March 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups: DHS-FG (21 patients) and FNS (29 patients). Comparison parameters included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications (nonunion, neck shortening, avascular necrosis). Patient-reported outcomes were measured using Harris Hip Score at final follow-up.
Results: We followed all 50 patients for 24-72 months (mean 30 ± 2.07 months). There were no significant differences between the groups in age, gender, fracture classification, postoperative neck shaft angle, and tip-apex distance. However, the union rate differed significantly between DHS-FG and FNS groups (p < 0.05). Significant differences were also observed in surgical time (100 ± 9 vs. 76 ± 23 min), blood loss (370 ± 31 vs. 231 ± 123 ml), and complications (3 [14.2%] vs. 10 [34.4%]) in DHS-FG and FNS groups, respectively.
Conclusion: In comminuted FNFs, DHS-FG demonstrated superior union rates and lower complication rates than FNS. DHS-FG may be an effective treatment option for this fracture type, requiring further research to explore potential benefits and limitations of FNS in this context.
Level of evidence: III.
Level of clinical care: Level I Tertiary trauma centre.
期刊介绍:
IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.