股骨颈粉碎性骨折(FNF)的DHS与腓骨支撑移植物是否更好?新型植入股骨颈系统的对比分析。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-04-29 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-025-01389-3
Purnaganapathi Sundaram Velmurugesan, Asif Imran, Nagashree Vasudeva, Agraharam Devendra, Jayaramaraju Dheenadhayalan, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
{"title":"股骨颈粉碎性骨折(FNF)的DHS与腓骨支撑移植物是否更好?新型植入股骨颈系统的对比分析。","authors":"Purnaganapathi Sundaram Velmurugesan, Asif Imran, Nagashree Vasudeva, Agraharam Devendra, Jayaramaraju Dheenadhayalan, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran","doi":"10.1007/s43465-025-01389-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The dynamic hip screw with fibular strut graft (DHS-FG) is a treatment method for femoral neck fractures (FNF) with multiple cortex comminution. Femoral neck systems (FNS) improve stability and prevent excessive neck shortening in FNFs. However, no comparative studies exist to determine method superiority. This study assesses the effectiveness and complications of DHS-FG versus FNS in treating comminuted FNFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of 50 patients (age 18-50) admitted to our institution with comminuted FNFs from January 2015 to March 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups: DHS-FG (21 patients) and FNS (29 patients). Comparison parameters included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications (nonunion, neck shortening, avascular necrosis). Patient-reported outcomes were measured using Harris Hip Score at final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We followed all 50 patients for 24-72 months (mean 30 ± 2.07 months). There were no significant differences between the groups in age, gender, fracture classification, postoperative neck shaft angle, and tip-apex distance. However, the union rate differed significantly between DHS-FG and FNS groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Significant differences were also observed in surgical time (100 ± 9 vs. 76 ± 23 min), blood loss (370 ± 31 vs. 231 ± 123 ml), and complications (3 [14.2%] vs. 10 [34.4%]) in DHS-FG and FNS groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In comminuted FNFs, DHS-FG demonstrated superior union rates and lower complication rates than FNS. DHS-FG may be an effective treatment option for this fracture type, requiring further research to explore potential benefits and limitations of FNS in this context.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p><p><strong>Level of clinical care: </strong>Level I Tertiary trauma centre.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"59 6","pages":"824-832"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12151948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is DHS with Fibular Strut Graft Superior for the Fixation of Comminuted Femoral Neck Fractures (FNF)? A Comparative Analysis with New Implant Femoral Neck System.\",\"authors\":\"Purnaganapathi Sundaram Velmurugesan, Asif Imran, Nagashree Vasudeva, Agraharam Devendra, Jayaramaraju Dheenadhayalan, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43465-025-01389-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The dynamic hip screw with fibular strut graft (DHS-FG) is a treatment method for femoral neck fractures (FNF) with multiple cortex comminution. Femoral neck systems (FNS) improve stability and prevent excessive neck shortening in FNFs. However, no comparative studies exist to determine method superiority. This study assesses the effectiveness and complications of DHS-FG versus FNS in treating comminuted FNFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of 50 patients (age 18-50) admitted to our institution with comminuted FNFs from January 2015 to March 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups: DHS-FG (21 patients) and FNS (29 patients). Comparison parameters included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications (nonunion, neck shortening, avascular necrosis). Patient-reported outcomes were measured using Harris Hip Score at final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We followed all 50 patients for 24-72 months (mean 30 ± 2.07 months). There were no significant differences between the groups in age, gender, fracture classification, postoperative neck shaft angle, and tip-apex distance. However, the union rate differed significantly between DHS-FG and FNS groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Significant differences were also observed in surgical time (100 ± 9 vs. 76 ± 23 min), blood loss (370 ± 31 vs. 231 ± 123 ml), and complications (3 [14.2%] vs. 10 [34.4%]) in DHS-FG and FNS groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In comminuted FNFs, DHS-FG demonstrated superior union rates and lower complication rates than FNS. DHS-FG may be an effective treatment option for this fracture type, requiring further research to explore potential benefits and limitations of FNS in this context.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p><p><strong>Level of clinical care: </strong>Level I Tertiary trauma centre.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"59 6\",\"pages\":\"824-832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12151948/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01389-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01389-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:动态髋螺钉联合腓骨支撑移植物(DHS-FG)是治疗股骨颈骨折(FNF)多发皮质粉碎的一种方法。股骨颈系统(FNS)可提高股骨颈的稳定性,防止股骨颈过度缩短。然而,目前还没有比较研究来确定方法的优越性。本研究评估了DHS-FG与FNS治疗粉碎性fnf的有效性和并发症。方法:回顾性分析2015年1月至2021年3月我院收治的50例粉碎性fnf患者(年龄18-50岁)。患者分为DHS-FG组(21例)和FNS组(29例)。比较参数包括手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间、并发症(骨不连、颈部缩短、缺血性坏死)。患者报告的结果在最后随访时使用Harris髋关节评分进行测量。结果:50例患者随访24 ~ 72个月(平均30±2.07个月)。两组间在年龄、性别、骨折分型、术后颈干角度、椎尖距等方面无显著差异。结论:在粉碎性fnf中,DHS-FG的愈合率高于FNS,并发症发生率低于FNS。DHS-FG可能是这种骨折类型的有效治疗选择,需要进一步研究FNS在这种情况下的潜在益处和局限性。证据水平:III。临床护理级别:一级三级创伤中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is DHS with Fibular Strut Graft Superior for the Fixation of Comminuted Femoral Neck Fractures (FNF)? A Comparative Analysis with New Implant Femoral Neck System.

Purpose: The dynamic hip screw with fibular strut graft (DHS-FG) is a treatment method for femoral neck fractures (FNF) with multiple cortex comminution. Femoral neck systems (FNS) improve stability and prevent excessive neck shortening in FNFs. However, no comparative studies exist to determine method superiority. This study assesses the effectiveness and complications of DHS-FG versus FNS in treating comminuted FNFs.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 50 patients (age 18-50) admitted to our institution with comminuted FNFs from January 2015 to March 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups: DHS-FG (21 patients) and FNS (29 patients). Comparison parameters included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications (nonunion, neck shortening, avascular necrosis). Patient-reported outcomes were measured using Harris Hip Score at final follow-up.

Results: We followed all 50 patients for 24-72 months (mean 30 ± 2.07 months). There were no significant differences between the groups in age, gender, fracture classification, postoperative neck shaft angle, and tip-apex distance. However, the union rate differed significantly between DHS-FG and FNS groups (p < 0.05). Significant differences were also observed in surgical time (100 ± 9 vs. 76 ± 23 min), blood loss (370 ± 31 vs. 231 ± 123 ml), and complications (3 [14.2%] vs. 10 [34.4%]) in DHS-FG and FNS groups, respectively.

Conclusion: In comminuted FNFs, DHS-FG demonstrated superior union rates and lower complication rates than FNS. DHS-FG may be an effective treatment option for this fracture type, requiring further research to explore potential benefits and limitations of FNS in this context.

Level of evidence: III.

Level of clinical care: Level I Tertiary trauma centre.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信