Florian Tagini, Søren Anker Uldum, Carla Berengua, Branislav Ivan, Riccarda Capaul, Sophie Edouard, Adrien Fischer, Jacky Flipse, Diego García Martínez de Artola, Daniel Goldenberger, Edou Heddema, Mirjam Hermans, Frank Imkamp, Darja Keše, Clara Lejarraga, Reto Lienhard, Carola Maffioli, Veerle Matheeussen, Patrick M Meyer Sauteur, Irena Mitrovic, Onya Opota, Christina Orasch, Pavel Drevinek, Olivia Peuchant, Liu Po-Yu, Mirja Puolakkainen, Melissa Remy, Khoa Td Thai, Nadia Wohlwend, Gilbert Greub
{"title":"2018 - 2023年欧洲27个地区和台湾地区2019冠状病毒病大流行前后肺炎衣原体分子检测的流行病学变化","authors":"Florian Tagini, Søren Anker Uldum, Carla Berengua, Branislav Ivan, Riccarda Capaul, Sophie Edouard, Adrien Fischer, Jacky Flipse, Diego García Martínez de Artola, Daniel Goldenberger, Edou Heddema, Mirjam Hermans, Frank Imkamp, Darja Keše, Clara Lejarraga, Reto Lienhard, Carola Maffioli, Veerle Matheeussen, Patrick M Meyer Sauteur, Irena Mitrovic, Onya Opota, Christina Orasch, Pavel Drevinek, Olivia Peuchant, Liu Po-Yu, Mirja Puolakkainen, Melissa Remy, Khoa Td Thai, Nadia Wohlwend, Gilbert Greub","doi":"10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.23.2400682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) such as social distancing, lockdowns and enhanced hygiene led to a decrease in respiratory pathogens. However, as NPIs were relaxed, a resurgence in several respiratory pathogens was observed including one local <i>Chlamydia pneumoniae</i> outbreak in Switzerland, prompting the need for a better understanding of <i>C. pneumoniae</i> epidemiology.AimTo assess temporal and geographical variations in <i>C. pneumoniae</i> detection before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsData on <i>C. pneumoniae</i> PCR detection ratios (number of positive tests/ total number of tests) across pre-pandemic (2018-2019), pandemic (2020-2022) and post-pandemic (2023) periods were collected via a global survey disseminated through various professional networks.Results<i>C. pneumoniae</i> detection ratios were analysed across 28 sites (27 in Europe, one in Taiwan) in 2023 (Dataset A, n = 172,223 tests) and 20 sites from 2018 to 2023 (Dataset B, n = 693,106 tests). Twenty-seven sites were laboratories (hospital or clinical) and one a surveillance system (Denmark). A significant decrease in detection ratios was observed during the pandemic period (from 1.05% to 0.23%, p < 0.001). In 2023, detection ratios increased to 0.28% (p < 0.002). Notable regional variations were found, with statistically significant increases in detection ratios at six sites located in Switzerland and Slovenia, where ratios ranged from 0.52% to 3.25%.DiscussionThe study highlights how NPIs influenced <i>C. pneumoniae</i> epidemiology, with reduced detection during the pandemic and partial resurgence afterwards. Regional variations suggest differing NPI impacts and underscore the need for continued surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12161,"journal":{"name":"Eurosurveillance","volume":"30 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epidemiological changes in <i>Chlamydia pneumoniae</i> molecular detections before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in 27 European sites and Taiwan, 2018 to 2023.\",\"authors\":\"Florian Tagini, Søren Anker Uldum, Carla Berengua, Branislav Ivan, Riccarda Capaul, Sophie Edouard, Adrien Fischer, Jacky Flipse, Diego García Martínez de Artola, Daniel Goldenberger, Edou Heddema, Mirjam Hermans, Frank Imkamp, Darja Keše, Clara Lejarraga, Reto Lienhard, Carola Maffioli, Veerle Matheeussen, Patrick M Meyer Sauteur, Irena Mitrovic, Onya Opota, Christina Orasch, Pavel Drevinek, Olivia Peuchant, Liu Po-Yu, Mirja Puolakkainen, Melissa Remy, Khoa Td Thai, Nadia Wohlwend, Gilbert Greub\",\"doi\":\"10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.23.2400682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) such as social distancing, lockdowns and enhanced hygiene led to a decrease in respiratory pathogens. However, as NPIs were relaxed, a resurgence in several respiratory pathogens was observed including one local <i>Chlamydia pneumoniae</i> outbreak in Switzerland, prompting the need for a better understanding of <i>C. pneumoniae</i> epidemiology.AimTo assess temporal and geographical variations in <i>C. pneumoniae</i> detection before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsData on <i>C. pneumoniae</i> PCR detection ratios (number of positive tests/ total number of tests) across pre-pandemic (2018-2019), pandemic (2020-2022) and post-pandemic (2023) periods were collected via a global survey disseminated through various professional networks.Results<i>C. pneumoniae</i> detection ratios were analysed across 28 sites (27 in Europe, one in Taiwan) in 2023 (Dataset A, n = 172,223 tests) and 20 sites from 2018 to 2023 (Dataset B, n = 693,106 tests). Twenty-seven sites were laboratories (hospital or clinical) and one a surveillance system (Denmark). A significant decrease in detection ratios was observed during the pandemic period (from 1.05% to 0.23%, p < 0.001). In 2023, detection ratios increased to 0.28% (p < 0.002). Notable regional variations were found, with statistically significant increases in detection ratios at six sites located in Switzerland and Slovenia, where ratios ranged from 0.52% to 3.25%.DiscussionThe study highlights how NPIs influenced <i>C. pneumoniae</i> epidemiology, with reduced detection during the pandemic and partial resurgence afterwards. Regional variations suggest differing NPI impacts and underscore the need for continued surveillance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurosurveillance\",\"volume\":\"30 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164279/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurosurveillance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.23.2400682\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurosurveillance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2025.30.23.2400682","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,保持社交距离、封锁和加强卫生等非药物干预措施导致呼吸道病原体减少。然而,随着npi的放松,观察到几种呼吸道病原体的死灰复燃,包括瑞士当地的一次肺炎衣原体暴发,这促使人们需要更好地了解肺炎衣原体流行病学。目的评估COVID-19大流行之前、期间和之后肺炎原体检测的时间和地理变化。方法通过各专业网络传播的全球调查,收集大流行前(2018-2019年)、大流行期(2020-2022年)和大流行后(2023年)期间肺炎支原体PCR检出率(阳性检测数/总检测数)数据。分析了2023年28个地点(欧洲27个,台湾1个)的肺炎检出率(数据集A, n = 172,223例)和2018年至2023年20个地点(数据集B, n = 693,106例)。27个是实验室(医院或临床),1个是监测系统(丹麦)。在大流行期间观察到检出率显著下降(从1.05%降至0.23%,肺炎原体流行病学),大流行期间检出率下降,之后部分复苏。区域差异表明了不同的NPI影响,并强调了持续监测的必要性。
Epidemiological changes in Chlamydia pneumoniae molecular detections before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in 27 European sites and Taiwan, 2018 to 2023.
BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) such as social distancing, lockdowns and enhanced hygiene led to a decrease in respiratory pathogens. However, as NPIs were relaxed, a resurgence in several respiratory pathogens was observed including one local Chlamydia pneumoniae outbreak in Switzerland, prompting the need for a better understanding of C. pneumoniae epidemiology.AimTo assess temporal and geographical variations in C. pneumoniae detection before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsData on C. pneumoniae PCR detection ratios (number of positive tests/ total number of tests) across pre-pandemic (2018-2019), pandemic (2020-2022) and post-pandemic (2023) periods were collected via a global survey disseminated through various professional networks.ResultsC. pneumoniae detection ratios were analysed across 28 sites (27 in Europe, one in Taiwan) in 2023 (Dataset A, n = 172,223 tests) and 20 sites from 2018 to 2023 (Dataset B, n = 693,106 tests). Twenty-seven sites were laboratories (hospital or clinical) and one a surveillance system (Denmark). A significant decrease in detection ratios was observed during the pandemic period (from 1.05% to 0.23%, p < 0.001). In 2023, detection ratios increased to 0.28% (p < 0.002). Notable regional variations were found, with statistically significant increases in detection ratios at six sites located in Switzerland and Slovenia, where ratios ranged from 0.52% to 3.25%.DiscussionThe study highlights how NPIs influenced C. pneumoniae epidemiology, with reduced detection during the pandemic and partial resurgence afterwards. Regional variations suggest differing NPI impacts and underscore the need for continued surveillance.
期刊介绍:
Eurosurveillance is a European peer-reviewed journal focusing on the epidemiology, surveillance, prevention, and control of communicable diseases relevant to Europe.It is a weekly online journal, with 50 issues per year published on Thursdays. The journal includes short rapid communications, in-depth research articles, surveillance reports, reviews, and perspective papers. It excels in timely publication of authoritative papers on ongoing outbreaks or other public health events. Under special circumstances when current events need to be urgently communicated to readers for rapid public health action, e-alerts can be released outside of the regular publishing schedule. Additionally, topical compilations and special issues may be provided in PDF format.