全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)宇宙的系统证据图。

IF 9.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Avanti V Shirke, Elizabeth G Radke, Ryan Jones, Barrett D Allen, Cynthia J Lin, Amanda Ross, Nicole Vetter, Courtney Lemeris, Pamela Hartman, Sorina Eftim, Arun Varghese, Robyn Blain, Heidi Hubbard, Antony J Williams, Kristina A Thayer, Laura M Carlson
{"title":"全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)宇宙的系统证据图。","authors":"Avanti V Shirke, Elizabeth G Radke, Ryan Jones, Barrett D Allen, Cynthia J Lin, Amanda Ross, Nicole Vetter, Courtney Lemeris, Pamela Hartman, Sorina Eftim, Arun Varghese, Robyn Blain, Heidi Hubbard, Antony J Williams, Kristina A Thayer, Laura M Carlson","doi":"10.1289/EHP16952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a research priority for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Because PFAS include thousands of structurally diverse chemicals, there is a pressing need for identifying what data are available to assess the human health hazard of these compounds.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We used systematic evidence map (SEM) methods to summarize the available epidemiological and mammalian bioassay evidence for ∿14,735 chemicals identified as PFAS by EPA's Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE). This work is a continuation of our previous 2022 and 2024 SEMs that inventoried evidence on a separate set of ∿500 PFAS. The Comprehensive PFAS Dashboard includes evidence identified from our past SEMs and completed EPA assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted literature searches from peer-reviewed and gray literature sources to identify, screen, and inventory mammalian bioassay and epidemiological literature. A combination of manual review and machine learning software were utilized. A diverse array of potentially relevant supplemental content was also tracked, including mechanistic data, exposure-only studies, and studies informing chemical toxicokinetics and clearance. For each study meeting predefined population, exposure, comparator, and outcome (PECO) criteria, experimental design details and health endpoints evaluated were summarized in interactive web-based literature inventory visuals. Epidemiology studies and animal bioassay studies with ≥21-day exposure duration or reproductive/developmental study design proceeded to undergo a study evaluation for risk of bias and sensitivity, as well as detailed extraction of health endpoint data. Underlying data are publicly available and can be downloaded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scientific database searches retrieved 152,205 references. After full-text screening, there were 347 mammalian bioassay and 44 epidemiological studies that met PECO criteria. The mammalian bioassay and epidemiological evidence assessed 99 and 30 individual PFAS, respectively (n = 18 PFAS with both). The epidemiological evidence assessed 15 health systems and the mammalian bioassay evidence assessed 16 health systems.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results from our 2022 and 2024 SEMs and completed EPA assessments are compiled into Comprehensive PFAS Dashboard. This dashboard is a resource for better understanding the currently available PFAS human health hazard data. It can be used as a tool for researchers and regulators interested in PFAS data gaps and research needs. Across all the data sources compiled into the Comprehensive PFAS Dashboard, only 1.4% (214/14,735) of PFAS had any mammalian bioassay or epidemiological data available. The vast majority of PFAS lack publicly available information about the potential human health effects of exposure to these chemicals.. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP16952.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Evidence Map for the Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Universe.\",\"authors\":\"Avanti V Shirke, Elizabeth G Radke, Ryan Jones, Barrett D Allen, Cynthia J Lin, Amanda Ross, Nicole Vetter, Courtney Lemeris, Pamela Hartman, Sorina Eftim, Arun Varghese, Robyn Blain, Heidi Hubbard, Antony J Williams, Kristina A Thayer, Laura M Carlson\",\"doi\":\"10.1289/EHP16952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a research priority for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Because PFAS include thousands of structurally diverse chemicals, there is a pressing need for identifying what data are available to assess the human health hazard of these compounds.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We used systematic evidence map (SEM) methods to summarize the available epidemiological and mammalian bioassay evidence for ∿14,735 chemicals identified as PFAS by EPA's Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE). This work is a continuation of our previous 2022 and 2024 SEMs that inventoried evidence on a separate set of ∿500 PFAS. The Comprehensive PFAS Dashboard includes evidence identified from our past SEMs and completed EPA assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted literature searches from peer-reviewed and gray literature sources to identify, screen, and inventory mammalian bioassay and epidemiological literature. A combination of manual review and machine learning software were utilized. A diverse array of potentially relevant supplemental content was also tracked, including mechanistic data, exposure-only studies, and studies informing chemical toxicokinetics and clearance. For each study meeting predefined population, exposure, comparator, and outcome (PECO) criteria, experimental design details and health endpoints evaluated were summarized in interactive web-based literature inventory visuals. Epidemiology studies and animal bioassay studies with ≥21-day exposure duration or reproductive/developmental study design proceeded to undergo a study evaluation for risk of bias and sensitivity, as well as detailed extraction of health endpoint data. Underlying data are publicly available and can be downloaded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scientific database searches retrieved 152,205 references. After full-text screening, there were 347 mammalian bioassay and 44 epidemiological studies that met PECO criteria. The mammalian bioassay and epidemiological evidence assessed 99 and 30 individual PFAS, respectively (n = 18 PFAS with both). The epidemiological evidence assessed 15 health systems and the mammalian bioassay evidence assessed 16 health systems.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results from our 2022 and 2024 SEMs and completed EPA assessments are compiled into Comprehensive PFAS Dashboard. This dashboard is a resource for better understanding the currently available PFAS human health hazard data. It can be used as a tool for researchers and regulators interested in PFAS data gaps and research needs. Across all the data sources compiled into the Comprehensive PFAS Dashboard, only 1.4% (214/14,735) of PFAS had any mammalian bioassay or epidemiological data available. The vast majority of PFAS lack publicly available information about the potential human health effects of exposure to these chemicals.. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP16952.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Health Perspectives\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Health Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP16952\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP16952","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是美国环境保护署(EPA)的研究重点。由于PFAS包括数千种结构各异的化学品,因此迫切需要确定哪些数据可用于评估这些化合物对人类健康的危害。目的:利用系统证据图(SEM)方法总结了美国环保署计算毒理学与暴露中心(CCTE)鉴定为PFAS的14,735种化学物质的流行病学和哺乳动物生物测定证据。这项工作是我们之前2022年和2024年的sem的延续,这些sem在一组单独的500 PFAS上记录了证据。综合PFAS仪表板包括从我们过去的sem和完成的EPA评估中确定的证据。方法:我们从同行评审文献和灰色文献中进行文献检索,以识别、筛选和整理哺乳动物生物测定和流行病学文献。人工审查和机器学习软件的结合使用。还跟踪了各种可能相关的补充内容,包括机制数据、仅暴露研究以及化学毒物动力学和清除研究。对于满足预定义人群、暴露、比较物和结果(PECO)标准的每项研究,实验设计细节和评估的健康终点在交互式网络文献清单视觉中进行总结。暴露时间≥21天的流行病学研究和动物生物测定研究或生殖/发育研究设计继续进行偏倚风险和敏感性的研究评估,并详细提取健康终点数据。基础数据是公开的,可以下载。结果:科学数据库检索到文献152205篇。经过全文筛选,有347项哺乳动物生物测定研究和44项流行病学研究符合PECO标准。哺乳动物生物测定和流行病学证据分别评估了99和30个个体PFAS (n = 18)。流行病学证据评估了15个卫生系统,哺乳动物生物测定证据评估了16个卫生系统。讨论:我们2022年和2024年sem的结果以及完成的EPA评估汇编为综合PFAS仪表板。该仪表板是更好地理解目前可用的PFAS人类健康危害数据的资源。它可以作为对PFAS数据缺口和研究需求感兴趣的研究人员和监管机构的工具。在综合PFAS仪表板中编制的所有数据源中,只有1.4%(214/14,735)的PFAS具有任何哺乳动物生物测定或流行病学数据。绝大多数PFAS缺乏关于接触这些化学品对人类健康的潜在影响的公开信息。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP16952。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic Evidence Map for the Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Universe.

Background: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a research priority for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Because PFAS include thousands of structurally diverse chemicals, there is a pressing need for identifying what data are available to assess the human health hazard of these compounds.

Objectives: We used systematic evidence map (SEM) methods to summarize the available epidemiological and mammalian bioassay evidence for ∿14,735 chemicals identified as PFAS by EPA's Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE). This work is a continuation of our previous 2022 and 2024 SEMs that inventoried evidence on a separate set of ∿500 PFAS. The Comprehensive PFAS Dashboard includes evidence identified from our past SEMs and completed EPA assessments.

Methods: We conducted literature searches from peer-reviewed and gray literature sources to identify, screen, and inventory mammalian bioassay and epidemiological literature. A combination of manual review and machine learning software were utilized. A diverse array of potentially relevant supplemental content was also tracked, including mechanistic data, exposure-only studies, and studies informing chemical toxicokinetics and clearance. For each study meeting predefined population, exposure, comparator, and outcome (PECO) criteria, experimental design details and health endpoints evaluated were summarized in interactive web-based literature inventory visuals. Epidemiology studies and animal bioassay studies with ≥21-day exposure duration or reproductive/developmental study design proceeded to undergo a study evaluation for risk of bias and sensitivity, as well as detailed extraction of health endpoint data. Underlying data are publicly available and can be downloaded.

Results: Scientific database searches retrieved 152,205 references. After full-text screening, there were 347 mammalian bioassay and 44 epidemiological studies that met PECO criteria. The mammalian bioassay and epidemiological evidence assessed 99 and 30 individual PFAS, respectively (n = 18 PFAS with both). The epidemiological evidence assessed 15 health systems and the mammalian bioassay evidence assessed 16 health systems.

Discussion: Results from our 2022 and 2024 SEMs and completed EPA assessments are compiled into Comprehensive PFAS Dashboard. This dashboard is a resource for better understanding the currently available PFAS human health hazard data. It can be used as a tool for researchers and regulators interested in PFAS data gaps and research needs. Across all the data sources compiled into the Comprehensive PFAS Dashboard, only 1.4% (214/14,735) of PFAS had any mammalian bioassay or epidemiological data available. The vast majority of PFAS lack publicly available information about the potential human health effects of exposure to these chemicals.. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP16952.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信