{"title":"微创全肠系膜切除术的教科书结果:评估和比较结果或基准的复合工具。","authors":"Vipul Gupta, Akash Mor, Rohit Mundhada, Mufaddal Kazi, Anjali Daphal, Ankit Sharma, Ashwin Desouza, Avanish P Saklani","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Textbook outcome is an integrated measure including both clinical as well as oncological outcomes. Within minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery, if achievement of textbook outcome translates into improved oncological outcomes is not studied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate textbook outcome and its associated factors for patients undergoing minimally invasive total mesorectal excision.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single center retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>The study was conducted at a high-volume tertiary referral cancer center in India.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All patients receiving elective laparoscopic or robotic total mesorectal excision from 2013- 2023 were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The number of patients achieving textbook outcome, institute's time trend, factors affecting textbook outcome and intermediate oncological outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1394 patients who underwent minimally invasive total mesorectal excision, 831 patients (60%) achieved textbook outcome. The conversion rate to open surgery is 0.2% with complications ≥ Clavien-Dindo 3 in 1.6% of patients. Twenty-seven percent patients had prolonged hospital stay with 30-day readmission rate being 3%. Four percent patients had a poor lymph node yield, R0 resection rate is 98% and adjuvant therapy delay is observed in 6% patients. The achievement of textbook outcome resulted in improved 3- year overall survival (92.1% vs 83.7%, p <0.001) and disease-free survival (81.5% vs 75.7%, p = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>The results of our study cannot be generalized to open total mesorectal excision, beyond total mesorectal excision and extended total mesorectal excision, where benchmark criteria definitions vary.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Textbook outcomes for minimally invasive total mesorectal excision was achieved in 60% rectal cancer patients at a high-volume tertiary cancer institute. It could be used for benchmarking, thus improving results of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision and also as a quality indicator in nationwide surgical audits. See Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Textbook Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Total Mesorectal Excision: A Composite Tool to Assess and Compare Outcomes or Benchmarking.\",\"authors\":\"Vipul Gupta, Akash Mor, Rohit Mundhada, Mufaddal Kazi, Anjali Daphal, Ankit Sharma, Ashwin Desouza, Avanish P Saklani\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Textbook outcome is an integrated measure including both clinical as well as oncological outcomes. Within minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery, if achievement of textbook outcome translates into improved oncological outcomes is not studied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate textbook outcome and its associated factors for patients undergoing minimally invasive total mesorectal excision.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single center retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>The study was conducted at a high-volume tertiary referral cancer center in India.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All patients receiving elective laparoscopic or robotic total mesorectal excision from 2013- 2023 were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The number of patients achieving textbook outcome, institute's time trend, factors affecting textbook outcome and intermediate oncological outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1394 patients who underwent minimally invasive total mesorectal excision, 831 patients (60%) achieved textbook outcome. The conversion rate to open surgery is 0.2% with complications ≥ Clavien-Dindo 3 in 1.6% of patients. Twenty-seven percent patients had prolonged hospital stay with 30-day readmission rate being 3%. Four percent patients had a poor lymph node yield, R0 resection rate is 98% and adjuvant therapy delay is observed in 6% patients. The achievement of textbook outcome resulted in improved 3- year overall survival (92.1% vs 83.7%, p <0.001) and disease-free survival (81.5% vs 75.7%, p = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>The results of our study cannot be generalized to open total mesorectal excision, beyond total mesorectal excision and extended total mesorectal excision, where benchmark criteria definitions vary.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Textbook outcomes for minimally invasive total mesorectal excision was achieved in 60% rectal cancer patients at a high-volume tertiary cancer institute. It could be used for benchmarking, thus improving results of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision and also as a quality indicator in nationwide surgical audits. See Video Abstract.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003837\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:教科书结果是包括临床和肿瘤结果的综合测量。在微创直肠癌手术中,如果达到教科书的结果转化为改善的肿瘤结果,则没有研究。目的:评价微创全肠系膜切除术患者的预后及其相关因素。设计:单中心回顾性研究。环境:该研究在印度的一个高容量三级转诊癌症中心进行。患者:纳入2013- 2023年间所有接受选择性腹腔镜或机器人全肠系膜切除术的患者。主要结局指标:评估达到教科书结局的患者人数、研究所的时间趋势、教科书结局的影响因素和中期肿瘤结局。结果:在1394例接受微创全肠系膜切除术的患者中,831例(60%)患者达到了标准结果。转换率为0.2%,并发症≥Clavien-Dindo 3的患者占1.6%。27%的患者住院时间延长,30天再入院率为3%。4%的患者淋巴结清除率低,R0切除率为98%,6%的患者观察到辅助治疗延迟。达到教科书的结果导致了3年总生存率的提高(92.1% vs 83.7%, p)。局限性:我们的研究结果不能推广到开放式全肠系膜切除术,除了全肠系膜切除术和扩展全肠系膜切除术,其中基准标准定义不同。结论:在一个大容量的三级癌症研究所,60%的直肠癌患者实现了微创全肠系膜切除术的教科书结果。可作为对标,提高微创全肠系膜切除术的效果,也可作为全国外科审计的质量指标。参见视频摘要。
Textbook Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Total Mesorectal Excision: A Composite Tool to Assess and Compare Outcomes or Benchmarking.
Background: Textbook outcome is an integrated measure including both clinical as well as oncological outcomes. Within minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery, if achievement of textbook outcome translates into improved oncological outcomes is not studied.
Objective: To evaluate textbook outcome and its associated factors for patients undergoing minimally invasive total mesorectal excision.
Design: Single center retrospective study.
Settings: The study was conducted at a high-volume tertiary referral cancer center in India.
Patients: All patients receiving elective laparoscopic or robotic total mesorectal excision from 2013- 2023 were included.
Main outcome measures: The number of patients achieving textbook outcome, institute's time trend, factors affecting textbook outcome and intermediate oncological outcomes were evaluated.
Results: Of the 1394 patients who underwent minimally invasive total mesorectal excision, 831 patients (60%) achieved textbook outcome. The conversion rate to open surgery is 0.2% with complications ≥ Clavien-Dindo 3 in 1.6% of patients. Twenty-seven percent patients had prolonged hospital stay with 30-day readmission rate being 3%. Four percent patients had a poor lymph node yield, R0 resection rate is 98% and adjuvant therapy delay is observed in 6% patients. The achievement of textbook outcome resulted in improved 3- year overall survival (92.1% vs 83.7%, p <0.001) and disease-free survival (81.5% vs 75.7%, p = 0.007).
Limitation: The results of our study cannot be generalized to open total mesorectal excision, beyond total mesorectal excision and extended total mesorectal excision, where benchmark criteria definitions vary.
Conclusion: Textbook outcomes for minimally invasive total mesorectal excision was achieved in 60% rectal cancer patients at a high-volume tertiary cancer institute. It could be used for benchmarking, thus improving results of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision and also as a quality indicator in nationwide surgical audits. See Video Abstract.
期刊介绍:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.