t细胞参与治疗复发/难治性惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的前景

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Current Opinion in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-05 DOI:10.1097/CCO.0000000000001160
Max Bakker, Maria T Kuipers, Marie José Kersten, Sanne H Tonino, Yasmina I M Serroukh
{"title":"t细胞参与治疗复发/难治性惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的前景","authors":"Max Bakker, Maria T Kuipers, Marie José Kersten, Sanne H Tonino, Yasmina I M Serroukh","doi":"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are indolent subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) characterized by a relapsing-remitting disease course. A promising novel therapeutic class emerges with T-cell engaging therapies, which include CD19 directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy and CD3xCD20 directed bispecific antibodies (BsABs). This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of their efficacy and safety along with logistical considerations in relapsed/refractory (r/r) iNHL.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several pivotal CAR-T trials have presented impressive response rates and durable remissions in r/r FL, while data in MZL is scarce. CAR-T is given as a single infusion, but requires a complex logistical infrastructure. Different BsAbs have shown favorable efficacy with a lower rate of acute toxicities. Off-the-shelve availability favors its usability, although prolonged administration of BsAbs might impose a substantial burden for patients. Long-term infection risk is a concern for both treatments. Clinical studies that directly compare CAR-T and BsAbs are still lacking.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Both CAR-T and BsAbs have demonstrated promising efficacy as treatment modalities in iNHL. Decision making for T-cell engaging therapies should be tailored to patient specific factors and availability. Maturation of follow-up data will further guide evidence-based treatment choices in FL and MZL.</p>","PeriodicalId":10893,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"393-400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives on T-cell engaging therapies in relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.\",\"authors\":\"Max Bakker, Maria T Kuipers, Marie José Kersten, Sanne H Tonino, Yasmina I M Serroukh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are indolent subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) characterized by a relapsing-remitting disease course. A promising novel therapeutic class emerges with T-cell engaging therapies, which include CD19 directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy and CD3xCD20 directed bispecific antibodies (BsABs). This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of their efficacy and safety along with logistical considerations in relapsed/refractory (r/r) iNHL.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several pivotal CAR-T trials have presented impressive response rates and durable remissions in r/r FL, while data in MZL is scarce. CAR-T is given as a single infusion, but requires a complex logistical infrastructure. Different BsAbs have shown favorable efficacy with a lower rate of acute toxicities. Off-the-shelve availability favors its usability, although prolonged administration of BsAbs might impose a substantial burden for patients. Long-term infection risk is a concern for both treatments. Clinical studies that directly compare CAR-T and BsAbs are still lacking.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Both CAR-T and BsAbs have demonstrated promising efficacy as treatment modalities in iNHL. Decision making for T-cell engaging therapies should be tailored to patient specific factors and availability. Maturation of follow-up data will further guide evidence-based treatment choices in FL and MZL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"393-400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001160\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)和边缘区淋巴瘤(MZL)是非霍奇金淋巴瘤(iNHL)的惰性亚型,其特点是疾病过程复发缓解。一种有前景的新型治疗方法是t细胞结合疗法,包括CD19定向嵌合抗原受体t细胞(CAR-T)疗法和CD3xCD20定向双特异性抗体(BsABs)。这篇综述提供了它们在复发/难治性iNHL (r/r)中的有效性和安全性以及后勤考虑的综合评价。最近的发现:几个关键的CAR-T试验在r/r FL中显示了令人印象深刻的缓解率和持久的缓解,而MZL的数据很少。CAR-T是单次输注,但需要复杂的后勤基础设施。不同的bsab显示出良好的疗效和较低的急性毒性发生率。尽管长期服用bsab可能会给患者带来沉重的负担,但现货供应有利于其可用性。长期感染风险是这两种治疗的一个问题。直接比较CAR-T和bsab的临床研究仍然缺乏。摘要:CAR-T和bsab作为治疗iNHL的方法都显示出了良好的疗效。t细胞介入疗法的决策应根据患者的具体因素和可用性进行调整。成熟的随访数据将进一步指导FL和MZL的循证治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectives on T-cell engaging therapies in relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Purpose of review: Follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are indolent subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) characterized by a relapsing-remitting disease course. A promising novel therapeutic class emerges with T-cell engaging therapies, which include CD19 directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy and CD3xCD20 directed bispecific antibodies (BsABs). This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of their efficacy and safety along with logistical considerations in relapsed/refractory (r/r) iNHL.

Recent findings: Several pivotal CAR-T trials have presented impressive response rates and durable remissions in r/r FL, while data in MZL is scarce. CAR-T is given as a single infusion, but requires a complex logistical infrastructure. Different BsAbs have shown favorable efficacy with a lower rate of acute toxicities. Off-the-shelve availability favors its usability, although prolonged administration of BsAbs might impose a substantial burden for patients. Long-term infection risk is a concern for both treatments. Clinical studies that directly compare CAR-T and BsAbs are still lacking.

Summary: Both CAR-T and BsAbs have demonstrated promising efficacy as treatment modalities in iNHL. Decision making for T-cell engaging therapies should be tailored to patient specific factors and availability. Maturation of follow-up data will further guide evidence-based treatment choices in FL and MZL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Oncology
Current Opinion in Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With its easy-to-digest reviews on important advances in world literature, Current Opinion in Oncology offers expert evaluation on a wide range of topics from sixteen key disciplines including sarcomas, cancer biology, melanoma and endocrine tumors. Published bimonthly, each issue covers in detail the most pertinent advances in these fields from the previous year. This is supplemented by annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信