第八版美国联合委员会胰腺癌TNM分期系统的预后有效性:对西班牙中心214例患者的分析。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2025-06-05 DOI:10.3390/cancers17111890
A M Colino-Gallardo, M J Fernández-Aceñero, M de la Torre-Serrano, J Vega-González, M P Díaz-Suárez, J Martínez-Useros
{"title":"第八版美国联合委员会胰腺癌TNM分期系统的预后有效性:对西班牙中心214例患者的分析。","authors":"A M Colino-Gallardo, M J Fernández-Aceñero, M de la Torre-Serrano, J Vega-González, M P Díaz-Suárez, J Martínez-Useros","doi":"10.3390/cancers17111890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Accurate staging is essential in pancreatic adenocarcinoma due to its aggressive nature and poor prognosis. The 8th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system introduced changes in tumor size criteria and nodal classification. This study compares the prognostic performance of the 7th and 8th editions in resected patients. <b>Material and Methods</b>: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 214 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent curative surgery. TNM staging was assigned according to both AJCC editions. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression, stratified by adjuvant therapy, were used to assess disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). <b>Results</b>: The 8th edition TNM staging was significantly associated with lower risk of recurrence, with TNM stages I and II independently predicting better DFS (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In contrast, the 7th edition TNM stage I remained the only independent predictor of OS (HR = 0.376; <i>p</i> = 0.023). Reclassification between editions altered stage distribution, particularly within stage II. <b>Conclusions</b>: The 8th edition improves early recurrence stratification, while the 7th edition retains stronger prognostic value for overall survival. Both systems offer complementary insights, supporting outcome-specific staging use.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Validity of the Eighth Edition of the U.S. Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas: An Analysis of 214 Patients at a Spanish Center.\",\"authors\":\"A M Colino-Gallardo, M J Fernández-Aceñero, M de la Torre-Serrano, J Vega-González, M P Díaz-Suárez, J Martínez-Useros\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/cancers17111890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Accurate staging is essential in pancreatic adenocarcinoma due to its aggressive nature and poor prognosis. The 8th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system introduced changes in tumor size criteria and nodal classification. This study compares the prognostic performance of the 7th and 8th editions in resected patients. <b>Material and Methods</b>: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 214 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent curative surgery. TNM staging was assigned according to both AJCC editions. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression, stratified by adjuvant therapy, were used to assess disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). <b>Results</b>: The 8th edition TNM staging was significantly associated with lower risk of recurrence, with TNM stages I and II independently predicting better DFS (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In contrast, the 7th edition TNM stage I remained the only independent predictor of OS (HR = 0.376; <i>p</i> = 0.023). Reclassification between editions altered stage distribution, particularly within stage II. <b>Conclusions</b>: The 8th edition improves early recurrence stratification, while the 7th edition retains stronger prognostic value for overall survival. Both systems offer complementary insights, supporting outcome-specific staging use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancers\",\"volume\":\"17 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153685/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17111890\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17111890","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于胰腺腺癌的侵袭性和预后差,准确的分期对其至关重要。第八版AJCC TNM分期系统引入了肿瘤大小标准和淋巴结分类的变化。本研究比较了第7版和第8版切除患者的预后表现。材料与方法:对214例行根治性手术治疗的胰腺腺癌患者进行回顾性分析。TNM分期是根据两个AJCC版本分配的。Kaplan-Meier分析和多变量Cox回归,通过辅助治疗分层,评估无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:第八版TNM分期与较低的复发风险显著相关,TNM分期I和II独立预测较好的DFS (p < 0.05)。相比之下,第7版TNM I期仍然是OS的唯一独立预测因子(HR = 0.376;P = 0.023)。版本之间的重新分类改变了阶段分布,特别是在阶段II内。结论:第8版改善了早期复发分层,而第7版保留了更强的总生存预后价值。这两个系统提供了互补的见解,支持特定结果的分期使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic Validity of the Eighth Edition of the U.S. Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas: An Analysis of 214 Patients at a Spanish Center.

Introduction: Accurate staging is essential in pancreatic adenocarcinoma due to its aggressive nature and poor prognosis. The 8th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system introduced changes in tumor size criteria and nodal classification. This study compares the prognostic performance of the 7th and 8th editions in resected patients. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 214 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent curative surgery. TNM staging was assigned according to both AJCC editions. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression, stratified by adjuvant therapy, were used to assess disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The 8th edition TNM staging was significantly associated with lower risk of recurrence, with TNM stages I and II independently predicting better DFS (p < 0.05). In contrast, the 7th edition TNM stage I remained the only independent predictor of OS (HR = 0.376; p = 0.023). Reclassification between editions altered stage distribution, particularly within stage II. Conclusions: The 8th edition improves early recurrence stratification, while the 7th edition retains stronger prognostic value for overall survival. Both systems offer complementary insights, supporting outcome-specific staging use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信