人工智能模型在预测肺癌复发中的有效性:基因生物标志物驱动的综述。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2025-06-05 DOI:10.3390/cancers17111892
Niloufar Pourakbar, Alireza Motamedi, Mahta Pashapour, Mohammad Emad Sharifi, Seyedemad Seyedgholami Sharabiani, Asra Fazlollahi, Hamid Abdollahi, Arman Rahmim, Sahar Rezaei
{"title":"人工智能模型在预测肺癌复发中的有效性:基因生物标志物驱动的综述。","authors":"Niloufar Pourakbar, Alireza Motamedi, Mahta Pashapour, Mohammad Emad Sharifi, Seyedemad Seyedgholami Sharabiani, Asra Fazlollahi, Hamid Abdollahi, Arman Rahmim, Sahar Rezaei","doi":"10.3390/cancers17111892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Lung cancer recurrence, particularly in NSCLC, remains a major challenge, with 30-70% of patients relapsing post-treatment. Traditional predictors like TNM staging and histopathology fail to account for tumor heterogeneity and immune dynamics. This review evaluates AI models integrating gene biomarkers (TP53, KRAS, FOXP3, PD-L1, and CD8) to enhance the recurrence prediction and improve the personalized risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed AI-driven recurrence prediction models for lung cancer, focusing on genomic biomarkers. Studies were selected based on predefined criteria, emphasizing AI/ML approaches integrating gene expression, radiomics, and clinical data. Data extraction covered the study design, AI algorithms (e.g., neural networks, SVM, and gradient boosting), performance metrics (AUC and sensitivity), and clinical applicability. Two reviewers independently screened and assessed studies to ensure accuracy and minimize bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A literature analysis of 18 studies (2019-2024) from 14 countries, covering 4861 NSCLC and small cell lung cancer patients, showed that AI models outperformed conventional methods. AI achieved AUCs of 0.73-0.92 compared to 0.61 for TNM staging. Multi-modal approaches integrating gene expression (PDIA3 and MYH11), radiomics, and clinical data improved accuracy, with SVM-based models reaching a 92% AUC. Key predictors included immune-related signatures (e.g., tumor-infiltrating NK cells and PD-L1 expression) and pathway alterations (NF-κB and JAK-STAT). However, small cohorts (41-1348 patients), data heterogeneity, and limited external validation remained challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI-driven models hold potential for recurrence prediction and guiding adjuvant therapies in high-risk NSCLC patients. Expanding multi-institutional datasets, standardizing validation, and improving clinical integration are crucial for real-world adoption. Optimizing biomarker panels and using AI trustworthily and ethically could enhance precision oncology, enabling early, tailored interventions to reduce mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Models in Predicting Lung Cancer Recurrence: A Gene Biomarker-Driven Review.\",\"authors\":\"Niloufar Pourakbar, Alireza Motamedi, Mahta Pashapour, Mohammad Emad Sharifi, Seyedemad Seyedgholami Sharabiani, Asra Fazlollahi, Hamid Abdollahi, Arman Rahmim, Sahar Rezaei\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/cancers17111892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Lung cancer recurrence, particularly in NSCLC, remains a major challenge, with 30-70% of patients relapsing post-treatment. Traditional predictors like TNM staging and histopathology fail to account for tumor heterogeneity and immune dynamics. This review evaluates AI models integrating gene biomarkers (TP53, KRAS, FOXP3, PD-L1, and CD8) to enhance the recurrence prediction and improve the personalized risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed AI-driven recurrence prediction models for lung cancer, focusing on genomic biomarkers. Studies were selected based on predefined criteria, emphasizing AI/ML approaches integrating gene expression, radiomics, and clinical data. Data extraction covered the study design, AI algorithms (e.g., neural networks, SVM, and gradient boosting), performance metrics (AUC and sensitivity), and clinical applicability. Two reviewers independently screened and assessed studies to ensure accuracy and minimize bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A literature analysis of 18 studies (2019-2024) from 14 countries, covering 4861 NSCLC and small cell lung cancer patients, showed that AI models outperformed conventional methods. AI achieved AUCs of 0.73-0.92 compared to 0.61 for TNM staging. Multi-modal approaches integrating gene expression (PDIA3 and MYH11), radiomics, and clinical data improved accuracy, with SVM-based models reaching a 92% AUC. Key predictors included immune-related signatures (e.g., tumor-infiltrating NK cells and PD-L1 expression) and pathway alterations (NF-κB and JAK-STAT). However, small cohorts (41-1348 patients), data heterogeneity, and limited external validation remained challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI-driven models hold potential for recurrence prediction and guiding adjuvant therapies in high-risk NSCLC patients. Expanding multi-institutional datasets, standardizing validation, and improving clinical integration are crucial for real-world adoption. Optimizing biomarker panels and using AI trustworthily and ethically could enhance precision oncology, enabling early, tailored interventions to reduce mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancers\",\"volume\":\"17 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153899/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17111892\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17111892","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:肺癌复发,特别是非小细胞肺癌,仍然是一个主要的挑战,30-70%的患者在治疗后复发。传统的预测因素如TNM分期和组织病理学不能解释肿瘤的异质性和免疫动力学。本文综述了整合基因生物标志物(TP53、KRAS、FOXP3、PD-L1和CD8)的AI模型,以增强复发预测和改善个性化风险分层。方法:根据PRISMA指南,我们系统地回顾了人工智能驱动的肺癌复发预测模型,重点关注基因组生物标志物。研究是根据预定义的标准选择的,强调整合基因表达、放射组学和临床数据的AI/ML方法。数据提取包括研究设计、人工智能算法(如神经网络、支持向量机和梯度增强)、性能指标(AUC和灵敏度)和临床适用性。两名审稿人独立筛选和评估研究,以确保准确性和最大限度地减少偏见。结果:对来自14个国家的18项研究(2019-2024),涵盖4861例非小细胞肺癌和小细胞肺癌患者的文献分析表明,人工智能模型优于传统方法。人工智能的auc为0.73-0.92,而TNM分期为0.61。整合基因表达(PDIA3和MYH11)、放射组学和临床数据的多模式方法提高了准确性,基于svm的模型达到92%的AUC。关键预测因子包括免疫相关特征(如肿瘤浸润性NK细胞和PD-L1表达)和通路改变(NF-κB和JAK-STAT)。然而,小队列(41-1348例患者)、数据异质性和有限的外部验证仍然是挑战。结论:人工智能驱动的模型具有预测高危NSCLC患者复发和指导辅助治疗的潜力。扩大多机构数据集、标准化验证和改善临床整合对于实际应用至关重要。优化生物标志物面板,并以可信赖和合乎道德的方式使用人工智能,可以提高肿瘤学的精确度,实现早期、量身定制的干预,以降低死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Models in Predicting Lung Cancer Recurrence: A Gene Biomarker-Driven Review.

Background/objectives: Lung cancer recurrence, particularly in NSCLC, remains a major challenge, with 30-70% of patients relapsing post-treatment. Traditional predictors like TNM staging and histopathology fail to account for tumor heterogeneity and immune dynamics. This review evaluates AI models integrating gene biomarkers (TP53, KRAS, FOXP3, PD-L1, and CD8) to enhance the recurrence prediction and improve the personalized risk stratification.

Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed AI-driven recurrence prediction models for lung cancer, focusing on genomic biomarkers. Studies were selected based on predefined criteria, emphasizing AI/ML approaches integrating gene expression, radiomics, and clinical data. Data extraction covered the study design, AI algorithms (e.g., neural networks, SVM, and gradient boosting), performance metrics (AUC and sensitivity), and clinical applicability. Two reviewers independently screened and assessed studies to ensure accuracy and minimize bias.

Results: A literature analysis of 18 studies (2019-2024) from 14 countries, covering 4861 NSCLC and small cell lung cancer patients, showed that AI models outperformed conventional methods. AI achieved AUCs of 0.73-0.92 compared to 0.61 for TNM staging. Multi-modal approaches integrating gene expression (PDIA3 and MYH11), radiomics, and clinical data improved accuracy, with SVM-based models reaching a 92% AUC. Key predictors included immune-related signatures (e.g., tumor-infiltrating NK cells and PD-L1 expression) and pathway alterations (NF-κB and JAK-STAT). However, small cohorts (41-1348 patients), data heterogeneity, and limited external validation remained challenges.

Conclusions: AI-driven models hold potential for recurrence prediction and guiding adjuvant therapies in high-risk NSCLC patients. Expanding multi-institutional datasets, standardizing validation, and improving clinical integration are crucial for real-world adoption. Optimizing biomarker panels and using AI trustworthily and ethically could enhance precision oncology, enabling early, tailored interventions to reduce mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信