塞内加尔女性生殖器切割调查数据中的自我报告和代理报告。

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Bulletin of the World Health Organization Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.2471/BLT.24.292383
Kathrin Weny, Romesh Silva, Stefanie J Klug
{"title":"塞内加尔女性生殖器切割调查数据中的自我报告和代理报告。","authors":"Kathrin Weny, Romesh Silva, Stefanie J Klug","doi":"10.2471/BLT.24.292383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the quality and consistency of reported age patterns of female genital mutilation in self- and proxy-reported survey data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 10 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 2005 to 2023 in Senegal. These surveys contained information on female genital mutilation status and age at experiencing this practice for women who reported data on themselves and daughters for whom data were reported by their mothers. We assessed data quality by completeness of information on age at female genital mutilation in a logistic regression analysis. We compared the occurrence of age heaping across DHS and individual survey characteristics such as education, age cohort and completeness of date of birth reporting. We estimated the median age at female genital mutilation of daughters and women to assess the consequences of differences in data quality for the interpretation of survey data on this practice.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Self-reported data were more prone to incomplete reporting of age at female genital mutilation and age heaping than proxy-reported data. These findings held true across individual survey characteristics and different DHS. The estimates for median age at female genital mutilation were susceptible to differences in data quality of age at female genital mutilation of daughters and women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-reported data on age at female genital mutilation are of lower quality than proxy-reported data. These differences potentially distort trend estimates of age at female genital mutilation. Caution is needed when combining self- and proxy-reported survey data on female genital mutilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9465,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","volume":"103 6","pages":"366-374"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-report and proxy reports in survey data on female genital mutilation, Senegal.\",\"authors\":\"Kathrin Weny, Romesh Silva, Stefanie J Klug\",\"doi\":\"10.2471/BLT.24.292383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the quality and consistency of reported age patterns of female genital mutilation in self- and proxy-reported survey data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 10 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 2005 to 2023 in Senegal. These surveys contained information on female genital mutilation status and age at experiencing this practice for women who reported data on themselves and daughters for whom data were reported by their mothers. We assessed data quality by completeness of information on age at female genital mutilation in a logistic regression analysis. We compared the occurrence of age heaping across DHS and individual survey characteristics such as education, age cohort and completeness of date of birth reporting. We estimated the median age at female genital mutilation of daughters and women to assess the consequences of differences in data quality for the interpretation of survey data on this practice.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Self-reported data were more prone to incomplete reporting of age at female genital mutilation and age heaping than proxy-reported data. These findings held true across individual survey characteristics and different DHS. The estimates for median age at female genital mutilation were susceptible to differences in data quality of age at female genital mutilation of daughters and women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-reported data on age at female genital mutilation are of lower quality than proxy-reported data. These differences potentially distort trend estimates of age at female genital mutilation. Caution is needed when combining self- and proxy-reported survey data on female genital mutilation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the World Health Organization\",\"volume\":\"103 6\",\"pages\":\"366-374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161157/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the World Health Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.24.292383\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.24.292383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价自我报告和代理报告调查数据中女性外阴残割年龄模式的质量和一致性。方法:采用2005 - 2023年在塞内加尔进行的10次人口与健康调查(DHS)。这些调查载有报告自己数据的妇女和其母亲报告其女儿数据的妇女关于切割女性生殖器官状况和经历这种做法的年龄的资料。我们通过逻辑回归分析中女性生殖器切割年龄信息的完整性来评估数据质量。我们比较了DHS中年龄堆积的发生率和个人调查特征,如教育程度、年龄队列和出生日期报告的完整性。我们估计了切割女儿和妇女女性生殖器官的中位年龄,以评估数据质量差异对解释这一做法的调查数据的影响。结果:自我报告的数据比代理报告的数据更容易不完整地报告女性生殖器切割和年龄堆积的年龄。这些发现适用于个人调查特征和不同的国土安全部。切割女性生殖器官的年龄中位数估计值容易受到切割女儿和妇女女性生殖器官年龄数据质量差异的影响。结论:自我报告的女性生殖器切割年龄数据质量低于代理报告的数据。这些差异可能扭曲对女性生殖器切割年龄的趋势估计。在结合自我报告和代理报告的关于切割女性生殖器官的调查数据时,需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-report and proxy reports in survey data on female genital mutilation, Senegal.

Objective: To assess the quality and consistency of reported age patterns of female genital mutilation in self- and proxy-reported survey data.

Methods: We used 10 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 2005 to 2023 in Senegal. These surveys contained information on female genital mutilation status and age at experiencing this practice for women who reported data on themselves and daughters for whom data were reported by their mothers. We assessed data quality by completeness of information on age at female genital mutilation in a logistic regression analysis. We compared the occurrence of age heaping across DHS and individual survey characteristics such as education, age cohort and completeness of date of birth reporting. We estimated the median age at female genital mutilation of daughters and women to assess the consequences of differences in data quality for the interpretation of survey data on this practice.

Findings: Self-reported data were more prone to incomplete reporting of age at female genital mutilation and age heaping than proxy-reported data. These findings held true across individual survey characteristics and different DHS. The estimates for median age at female genital mutilation were susceptible to differences in data quality of age at female genital mutilation of daughters and women.

Conclusion: Self-reported data on age at female genital mutilation are of lower quality than proxy-reported data. These differences potentially distort trend estimates of age at female genital mutilation. Caution is needed when combining self- and proxy-reported survey data on female genital mutilation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Bulletin of the World Health Organization 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.90%
发文量
317
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the World Health Organization Journal Overview: Leading public health journal Peer-reviewed monthly journal Special focus on developing countries Global scope and authority Top public and environmental health journal Impact factor of 6.818 (2018), according to Web of Science ranking Audience: Essential reading for public health decision-makers and researchers Provides blend of research, well-informed opinion, and news
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信