Carl H Coleman, Alireza Khadem, John C Reeder, Hiiti B Sillo, Rogerio Gaspar, Andreas Reis
{"title":"世界卫生组织用于评估研究伦理监督系统的工具。","authors":"Carl H Coleman, Alireza Khadem, John C Reeder, Hiiti B Sillo, Rogerio Gaspar, Andreas Reis","doi":"10.2471/BLT.24.292219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although most countries have ethical oversight systems for health-related research involving human participants, mechanisms for assessing the quality of those systems are not regularly used, particularly in low-resource settings. To address this gap, the Regulatory System Strengthening, Regulation and Safety unit and Health Ethics and Governance unit of the World Health Organization (WHO) recently released a tool for benchmarking ethics oversight of health-related research involving human participants. The tool provides a simple, easy-to-measure set of indicators for assessing the quality of research ethics oversight systems without the need to invest a great deal of resources. The tool comprises 48 indicators divided across three areas: (i) the national context; (ii) research ethics committees; and (iii) institutions that conduct health-related research involving humans, such as academic medical centres. Indicators related to the national context are intended to be evaluated in a single assessment applicable to the country as a whole, whereas indicators related to research ethics committees and research institutions are evaluated on an entity-by-entity basis. Some countries may choose to assess a representative sample of research ethics committees and institutions; alternatively, national authorities might ask research ethics committees and institutions to undertake self-assessments and report the results. Research ethics committees or institutions could also use WHO's tool on their own as part of a process of quality improvement. WHO is working with global partners to disseminate the tool and support global implementation. Widespread use of the tool is expected to enhance policy coherence in ethics oversight and facilitate multinational research.</p>","PeriodicalId":9465,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","volume":"103 6","pages":"403-409"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A World Health Organization tool for assessing research ethics oversight systems.\",\"authors\":\"Carl H Coleman, Alireza Khadem, John C Reeder, Hiiti B Sillo, Rogerio Gaspar, Andreas Reis\",\"doi\":\"10.2471/BLT.24.292219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although most countries have ethical oversight systems for health-related research involving human participants, mechanisms for assessing the quality of those systems are not regularly used, particularly in low-resource settings. To address this gap, the Regulatory System Strengthening, Regulation and Safety unit and Health Ethics and Governance unit of the World Health Organization (WHO) recently released a tool for benchmarking ethics oversight of health-related research involving human participants. The tool provides a simple, easy-to-measure set of indicators for assessing the quality of research ethics oversight systems without the need to invest a great deal of resources. The tool comprises 48 indicators divided across three areas: (i) the national context; (ii) research ethics committees; and (iii) institutions that conduct health-related research involving humans, such as academic medical centres. Indicators related to the national context are intended to be evaluated in a single assessment applicable to the country as a whole, whereas indicators related to research ethics committees and research institutions are evaluated on an entity-by-entity basis. Some countries may choose to assess a representative sample of research ethics committees and institutions; alternatively, national authorities might ask research ethics committees and institutions to undertake self-assessments and report the results. Research ethics committees or institutions could also use WHO's tool on their own as part of a process of quality improvement. WHO is working with global partners to disseminate the tool and support global implementation. Widespread use of the tool is expected to enhance policy coherence in ethics oversight and facilitate multinational research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the World Health Organization\",\"volume\":\"103 6\",\"pages\":\"403-409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161159/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the World Health Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.24.292219\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.24.292219","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
A World Health Organization tool for assessing research ethics oversight systems.
Although most countries have ethical oversight systems for health-related research involving human participants, mechanisms for assessing the quality of those systems are not regularly used, particularly in low-resource settings. To address this gap, the Regulatory System Strengthening, Regulation and Safety unit and Health Ethics and Governance unit of the World Health Organization (WHO) recently released a tool for benchmarking ethics oversight of health-related research involving human participants. The tool provides a simple, easy-to-measure set of indicators for assessing the quality of research ethics oversight systems without the need to invest a great deal of resources. The tool comprises 48 indicators divided across three areas: (i) the national context; (ii) research ethics committees; and (iii) institutions that conduct health-related research involving humans, such as academic medical centres. Indicators related to the national context are intended to be evaluated in a single assessment applicable to the country as a whole, whereas indicators related to research ethics committees and research institutions are evaluated on an entity-by-entity basis. Some countries may choose to assess a representative sample of research ethics committees and institutions; alternatively, national authorities might ask research ethics committees and institutions to undertake self-assessments and report the results. Research ethics committees or institutions could also use WHO's tool on their own as part of a process of quality improvement. WHO is working with global partners to disseminate the tool and support global implementation. Widespread use of the tool is expected to enhance policy coherence in ethics oversight and facilitate multinational research.
期刊介绍:
The Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Journal Overview:
Leading public health journal
Peer-reviewed monthly journal
Special focus on developing countries
Global scope and authority
Top public and environmental health journal
Impact factor of 6.818 (2018), according to Web of Science ranking
Audience:
Essential reading for public health decision-makers and researchers
Provides blend of research, well-informed opinion, and news