髌骨脱位矫正中滑骨成形术的对比放射学分析:一种改进的骨关节炎评分系统的观察者间一致意见。

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Animals Pub Date : 2025-06-03 DOI:10.3390/ani15111639
Nikolaus Velich, Britta Vidoni, Eberhard Ludewig, Alexander Tichy, Eva Schnabl-Feichter
{"title":"髌骨脱位矫正中滑骨成形术的对比放射学分析:一种改进的骨关节炎评分系统的观察者间一致意见。","authors":"Nikolaus Velich, Britta Vidoni, Eberhard Ludewig, Alexander Tichy, Eva Schnabl-Feichter","doi":"10.3390/ani15111639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patellar luxation is common in small breed dogs and is often treated surgically. This study compares the long-term outcomes of two surgical techniques, trochlear wedge recession (TWR) and trochlear block recession (TBR), for medial patellar luxation (MPL) with regard to osteoarthritis (OA) progression. High inter-observer agreement was hypothesized for the use of a modified OA scoring system and fewer OA changes in the TBR group. This study included 25 dogs (<15 kg) with grade-2 or -3 MPLs treated at the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (2016-2021). A total of 32 stifle joints (TWR Group n = 11, TBR Group n = 21) were evaluated pre-operatively and at least one year post-operatively using a modified OA scoring system. A statistical analysis was conducted to compare OA progression between the techniques. The inter-observer agreement was high. The OA scores increased in both groups post-operatively, with TBR demonstrating a greater progression at specific points. Overall, no significant differences were found between the techniques. These findings suggest that OA progression does not significantly differ between TWR and TBR. The modified OA scoring system has shown to be reliable for assessing OA progression after treatment. Further prospective studies with larger study populations incorporating clinical assessments are needed for a better understanding of the surgical impacts on OA development.</p>","PeriodicalId":7955,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153589/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Radiographic Analysis of Trochleoplasties for Patellar Luxation Correction: Inter-Observer Agreement of a Modified Osteoarthritis Scoring System.\",\"authors\":\"Nikolaus Velich, Britta Vidoni, Eberhard Ludewig, Alexander Tichy, Eva Schnabl-Feichter\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ani15111639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patellar luxation is common in small breed dogs and is often treated surgically. This study compares the long-term outcomes of two surgical techniques, trochlear wedge recession (TWR) and trochlear block recession (TBR), for medial patellar luxation (MPL) with regard to osteoarthritis (OA) progression. High inter-observer agreement was hypothesized for the use of a modified OA scoring system and fewer OA changes in the TBR group. This study included 25 dogs (<15 kg) with grade-2 or -3 MPLs treated at the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (2016-2021). A total of 32 stifle joints (TWR Group n = 11, TBR Group n = 21) were evaluated pre-operatively and at least one year post-operatively using a modified OA scoring system. A statistical analysis was conducted to compare OA progression between the techniques. The inter-observer agreement was high. The OA scores increased in both groups post-operatively, with TBR demonstrating a greater progression at specific points. Overall, no significant differences were found between the techniques. These findings suggest that OA progression does not significantly differ between TWR and TBR. The modified OA scoring system has shown to be reliable for assessing OA progression after treatment. Further prospective studies with larger study populations incorporating clinical assessments are needed for a better understanding of the surgical impacts on OA development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animals\",\"volume\":\"15 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12153589/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15111639\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15111639","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

髌骨脱位在小型犬中很常见,通常通过手术治疗。本研究比较了两种手术技术,滑车楔形退退(TWR)和滑车块退退(TBR)治疗内侧髌骨脱位(MPL)与骨关节炎(OA)进展的长期结果。假设使用改进的OA评分系统和TBR组OA变化较少,观察者之间的一致性很高。这项研究包括25只狗(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Radiographic Analysis of Trochleoplasties for Patellar Luxation Correction: Inter-Observer Agreement of a Modified Osteoarthritis Scoring System.

Patellar luxation is common in small breed dogs and is often treated surgically. This study compares the long-term outcomes of two surgical techniques, trochlear wedge recession (TWR) and trochlear block recession (TBR), for medial patellar luxation (MPL) with regard to osteoarthritis (OA) progression. High inter-observer agreement was hypothesized for the use of a modified OA scoring system and fewer OA changes in the TBR group. This study included 25 dogs (<15 kg) with grade-2 or -3 MPLs treated at the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (2016-2021). A total of 32 stifle joints (TWR Group n = 11, TBR Group n = 21) were evaluated pre-operatively and at least one year post-operatively using a modified OA scoring system. A statistical analysis was conducted to compare OA progression between the techniques. The inter-observer agreement was high. The OA scores increased in both groups post-operatively, with TBR demonstrating a greater progression at specific points. Overall, no significant differences were found between the techniques. These findings suggest that OA progression does not significantly differ between TWR and TBR. The modified OA scoring system has shown to be reliable for assessing OA progression after treatment. Further prospective studies with larger study populations incorporating clinical assessments are needed for a better understanding of the surgical impacts on OA development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animals
Animals Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3015
审稿时长
20.52 days
期刊介绍: Animals (ISSN 2076-2615) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves animals, including zoology, ethnozoology, animal science, animal ethics and animal welfare. However, preference will be given to those articles that provide an understanding of animals within a larger context (i.e., the animals'' interactions with the outside world, including humans). There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental details and/or method of study, must be provided for research articles. Articles submitted that involve subjecting animals to unnecessary pain or suffering will not be accepted, and all articles must be submitted with the necessary ethical approval (please refer to the Ethical Guidelines for more information).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信