精油减轻肉鸡球虫病的影响:一项荟萃分析。

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Ridho Kurniawan Rusli, Melia Afnida Santi, Nuraini Nuraini, Mustofa Hilmi, Mirzah Mirzah, Cecep Hidayat, Arief Darmawan, Khairani Khairani, Rita Mutia, Mirnawati Mirnawati, Anuraga Jayanegara, Agung Irawan
{"title":"精油减轻肉鸡球虫病的影响:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Ridho Kurniawan Rusli, Melia Afnida Santi, Nuraini Nuraini, Mustofa Hilmi, Mirzah Mirzah, Cecep Hidayat, Arief Darmawan, Khairani Khairani, Rita Mutia, Mirnawati Mirnawati, Anuraga Jayanegara, Agung Irawan","doi":"10.5713/ab.25.0267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis aims to examine the efficacy of essential oils (EO) as an anticoccidial alternative on broiler chickens under coccidia challenged trials, focusing on performance indicators including average daily gain (ADG), feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), final body weight (BW), mortality, and intestinal lesion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A random-effects model was performed using the metafor package in R software. In a subgroup meta-analysis, treatment groups including coccidia-infected birds [C+], C+ group treated with EO [C+EO] or antibiotics [C+AB], and a non-infected control group treated with EO or AB, were compared against the control group [CON].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As expected, C+ birds had lower (p<0.001) final BW and ADG as well as higher (p<0.001) FCR. Administration of either EO or AB on birds with coccidiosis infection resulted in similar final BW, ADG, FI, and FCR with CON birds, suggesting the comparable effectiveness of EO and AB to alleviate the adverse effects of coccidiosis. Broilers on the C+ group exhibited increased small intestine damage as shown by the greater (p<0.001) lesion score, but the mortality was not different from CON and other treatment groups. The Eimeria oocyst count was lower on birds treated with EO than on the infected birds, with an average suppression of 42.11%. Meta-regression demonstrated that C+ birds had inferior FI and ADG than CON and C+EO birds. However, high heterogeneity between studies was identified in all measured outcomes as shown by I² > 75%, suggesting wide variability among study conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Essential oils may serve as an alternative antibiotic to mitigate the negative impacts of coccidiosis infection in broiler chickens.</p>","PeriodicalId":7825,"journal":{"name":"Animal Bioscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Essential oils alleviate coccidiosis impact in broiler chickens: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ridho Kurniawan Rusli, Melia Afnida Santi, Nuraini Nuraini, Mustofa Hilmi, Mirzah Mirzah, Cecep Hidayat, Arief Darmawan, Khairani Khairani, Rita Mutia, Mirnawati Mirnawati, Anuraga Jayanegara, Agung Irawan\",\"doi\":\"10.5713/ab.25.0267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis aims to examine the efficacy of essential oils (EO) as an anticoccidial alternative on broiler chickens under coccidia challenged trials, focusing on performance indicators including average daily gain (ADG), feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), final body weight (BW), mortality, and intestinal lesion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A random-effects model was performed using the metafor package in R software. In a subgroup meta-analysis, treatment groups including coccidia-infected birds [C+], C+ group treated with EO [C+EO] or antibiotics [C+AB], and a non-infected control group treated with EO or AB, were compared against the control group [CON].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As expected, C+ birds had lower (p<0.001) final BW and ADG as well as higher (p<0.001) FCR. Administration of either EO or AB on birds with coccidiosis infection resulted in similar final BW, ADG, FI, and FCR with CON birds, suggesting the comparable effectiveness of EO and AB to alleviate the adverse effects of coccidiosis. Broilers on the C+ group exhibited increased small intestine damage as shown by the greater (p<0.001) lesion score, but the mortality was not different from CON and other treatment groups. The Eimeria oocyst count was lower on birds treated with EO than on the infected birds, with an average suppression of 42.11%. Meta-regression demonstrated that C+ birds had inferior FI and ADG than CON and C+EO birds. However, high heterogeneity between studies was identified in all measured outcomes as shown by I² > 75%, suggesting wide variability among study conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Essential oils may serve as an alternative antibiotic to mitigate the negative impacts of coccidiosis infection in broiler chickens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Bioscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Bioscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.25.0267\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Bioscience","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.25.0267","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本荟萃分析旨在通过研究平均日增重(ADG)、采食量(FI)、饲料系数(FCR)、最终体重(BW)、死亡率和肠道病变等性能指标,研究精油(EO)作为抗球虫替代品对肉鸡球虫感染试验的效果。方法:采用R软件中的元软件包建立随机效应模型。在亚组荟萃分析中,将球虫感染的禽类[C+]、EO [C+EO]或抗生素[C+AB]治疗的C+组和EO或AB治疗的非感染对照组与对照组[CON]进行比较。结果:正如预期的那样,C+鸟类的p值较低(p值为75%),表明研究条件之间存在很大差异。结论:精油可作为一种替代抗生素,减轻肉鸡球虫病感染的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Essential oils alleviate coccidiosis impact in broiler chickens: a meta-analysis.

Objective: This meta-analysis aims to examine the efficacy of essential oils (EO) as an anticoccidial alternative on broiler chickens under coccidia challenged trials, focusing on performance indicators including average daily gain (ADG), feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), final body weight (BW), mortality, and intestinal lesion.

Methods: A random-effects model was performed using the metafor package in R software. In a subgroup meta-analysis, treatment groups including coccidia-infected birds [C+], C+ group treated with EO [C+EO] or antibiotics [C+AB], and a non-infected control group treated with EO or AB, were compared against the control group [CON].

Results: As expected, C+ birds had lower (p<0.001) final BW and ADG as well as higher (p<0.001) FCR. Administration of either EO or AB on birds with coccidiosis infection resulted in similar final BW, ADG, FI, and FCR with CON birds, suggesting the comparable effectiveness of EO and AB to alleviate the adverse effects of coccidiosis. Broilers on the C+ group exhibited increased small intestine damage as shown by the greater (p<0.001) lesion score, but the mortality was not different from CON and other treatment groups. The Eimeria oocyst count was lower on birds treated with EO than on the infected birds, with an average suppression of 42.11%. Meta-regression demonstrated that C+ birds had inferior FI and ADG than CON and C+EO birds. However, high heterogeneity between studies was identified in all measured outcomes as shown by I² > 75%, suggesting wide variability among study conditions.

Conclusion: Essential oils may serve as an alternative antibiotic to mitigate the negative impacts of coccidiosis infection in broiler chickens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Bioscience
Animal Bioscience AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
223
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信