偏好和意愿支付早期儿童健康生活方式倡议结果:一个离散选择实验。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Obesity Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-12 DOI:10.1111/ijpo.70033
Vicki Brown, Brittany J Johnson, Thomas Lung, Alison Hayes, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Konsita Kuswara, Elisabeth Huynh
{"title":"偏好和意愿支付早期儿童健康生活方式倡议结果:一个离散选择实验。","authors":"Vicki Brown, Brittany J Johnson, Thomas Lung, Alison Hayes, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Konsita Kuswara, Elisabeth Huynh","doi":"10.1111/ijpo.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding stakeholder preferences and values for early childhood initiatives to support healthy diets, physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour is key for effective intervention design and resource allocation. This study aims to estimate the preferences for and value of outcomes from the perspectives of parents/caregivers of Australian children aged from birth to 5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Discrete choice experiment, 466 parent/caregivers recruited from online platform. Participants selected between two healthy lifestyle initiatives or a \"neither\" option. Initiatives were described by attributes including cost, participation and outcomes. Mixed multinomial logistic models were used to determine preferences and willingness-to-pay per annum framed as an increase in income taxes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effect on diet was the most important influence on parent/caregiver choice to participate (p < 0.01), followed by effect on physical activity (p < 0.01), wellbeing (p < 0.01) and healthy growth (p < 0.01). Parents/caregivers were less sensitive to cost for initiatives aimed at specific children (e.g., targeted initiatives for a priority population). Willingness-to-pay estimates ranged from AUD$176 for improved wellbeing to $219 for healthier diets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that leveraging the potential for healthier diets, followed by healthier physical activity behaviours, as a key benefit of participation may be particularly attractive to parents/caregivers. In addition, some level of equity preference could be acceptable to parents/caregivers in the allocation of scarce resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":217,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Obesity","volume":" ","pages":"e70033"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferences and willingness to pay for early childhood healthy lifestyle initiative outcomes: A discrete choice experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Vicki Brown, Brittany J Johnson, Thomas Lung, Alison Hayes, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Konsita Kuswara, Elisabeth Huynh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijpo.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding stakeholder preferences and values for early childhood initiatives to support healthy diets, physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour is key for effective intervention design and resource allocation. This study aims to estimate the preferences for and value of outcomes from the perspectives of parents/caregivers of Australian children aged from birth to 5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Discrete choice experiment, 466 parent/caregivers recruited from online platform. Participants selected between two healthy lifestyle initiatives or a \\\"neither\\\" option. Initiatives were described by attributes including cost, participation and outcomes. Mixed multinomial logistic models were used to determine preferences and willingness-to-pay per annum framed as an increase in income taxes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effect on diet was the most important influence on parent/caregiver choice to participate (p < 0.01), followed by effect on physical activity (p < 0.01), wellbeing (p < 0.01) and healthy growth (p < 0.01). Parents/caregivers were less sensitive to cost for initiatives aimed at specific children (e.g., targeted initiatives for a priority population). Willingness-to-pay estimates ranged from AUD$176 for improved wellbeing to $219 for healthier diets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that leveraging the potential for healthier diets, followed by healthier physical activity behaviours, as a key benefit of participation may be particularly attractive to parents/caregivers. In addition, some level of equity preference could be acceptable to parents/caregivers in the allocation of scarce resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Obesity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70033\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12329628/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.70033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.70033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:了解利益相关者对支持健康饮食、身体活动和减少久坐行为的幼儿倡议的偏好和价值观,是有效干预设计和资源分配的关键。本研究旨在从澳大利亚出生至5岁儿童的父母/照顾者的角度估计对结果的偏好和价值。方法:离散选择实验,从网络平台招募466名家长/照顾者。参与者可以选择两种健康的生活方式,或者两者都不选择。计划是通过成本、参与和结果等属性来描述的。使用混合多项逻辑模型来确定偏好和每年支付意愿,框架为所得税的增加。结果:饮食的影响是父母/照顾者选择参与的最重要影响因素(p结论:结果表明,利用更健康饮食的潜力,然后是更健康的身体活动行为,作为参与的一个关键好处,可能对父母/照顾者特别有吸引力。此外,父母/照顾者在分配稀缺资源时可以接受一定程度的股权偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Preferences and willingness to pay for early childhood healthy lifestyle initiative outcomes: A discrete choice experiment.

Preferences and willingness to pay for early childhood healthy lifestyle initiative outcomes: A discrete choice experiment.

Preferences and willingness to pay for early childhood healthy lifestyle initiative outcomes: A discrete choice experiment.

Preferences and willingness to pay for early childhood healthy lifestyle initiative outcomes: A discrete choice experiment.

Preferences and willingness to pay for early childhood healthy lifestyle initiative outcomes: A discrete choice experiment.

Background: Understanding stakeholder preferences and values for early childhood initiatives to support healthy diets, physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour is key for effective intervention design and resource allocation. This study aims to estimate the preferences for and value of outcomes from the perspectives of parents/caregivers of Australian children aged from birth to 5 years.

Methods: Discrete choice experiment, 466 parent/caregivers recruited from online platform. Participants selected between two healthy lifestyle initiatives or a "neither" option. Initiatives were described by attributes including cost, participation and outcomes. Mixed multinomial logistic models were used to determine preferences and willingness-to-pay per annum framed as an increase in income taxes.

Results: Effect on diet was the most important influence on parent/caregiver choice to participate (p < 0.01), followed by effect on physical activity (p < 0.01), wellbeing (p < 0.01) and healthy growth (p < 0.01). Parents/caregivers were less sensitive to cost for initiatives aimed at specific children (e.g., targeted initiatives for a priority population). Willingness-to-pay estimates ranged from AUD$176 for improved wellbeing to $219 for healthier diets.

Conclusions: Results suggest that leveraging the potential for healthier diets, followed by healthier physical activity behaviours, as a key benefit of participation may be particularly attractive to parents/caregivers. In addition, some level of equity preference could be acceptable to parents/caregivers in the allocation of scarce resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Obesity
Pediatric Obesity PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Obesity is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal devoted to research into obesity during childhood and adolescence. The topic is currently at the centre of intense interest in the scientific community, and is of increasing concern to health policy-makers and the public at large. Pediatric Obesity has established itself as the leading journal for high quality papers in this field, including, but not limited to, the following: Genetic, molecular, biochemical and physiological aspects of obesity – basic, applied and clinical studies relating to mechanisms of the development of obesity throughout the life course and the consequent effects of obesity on health outcomes Metabolic consequences of child and adolescent obesity Epidemiological and population-based studies of child and adolescent overweight and obesity Measurement and diagnostic issues in assessing child and adolescent adiposity, physical activity and nutrition Clinical management of children and adolescents with obesity including studies of treatment and prevention Co-morbidities linked to child and adolescent obesity – mechanisms, assessment, and treatment Life-cycle factors eg familial, intrauterine and developmental aspects of child and adolescent obesity Nutrition security and the "double burden" of obesity and malnutrition Health promotion strategies around the issues of obesity, nutrition and physical activity in children and adolescents Community and public health measures to prevent overweight and obesity in children and adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信