在物种丰富的草原上,植物-土壤反馈对入侵物种和本地物种之间的竞争结果没有贡献

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Annamária Fenesi, Lilla Szőcs, Péter Török, Eszter Ruprecht
{"title":"在物种丰富的草原上,植物-土壤反馈对入侵物种和本地物种之间的竞争结果没有贡献","authors":"Annamária Fenesi,&nbsp;Lilla Szőcs,&nbsp;Péter Török,&nbsp;Eszter Ruprecht","doi":"10.1111/jvs.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Question</h3>\n \n <p>Native and invasive species interact simultaneously with each other and with their species-specific soil biota, yet the relative importance of native plant–soil feedback (PSF) on the outcome of competition between these species with different origins is poorly understood. Therefore, we studied the influence of native PSF on the performance of two invasive and two native target species in two situations: (1) when the species were grown alone, and (2) when the target species were grown in pairwise competitive setup with the native conditioning species. We also tested the importance of phylogenetic relatedness between target and conditioning species on the simultaneous effect of PSF and competition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Cluj-Napoca, Romania.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used native species from a semi-dry grassland dominated by <i>Brachypodium pinnatum</i> and <i>Festuca rupicola</i> to study how their species-specific PSFs affect the performance of invasive (<i>Solidago canadensis, Erigeron canadensis</i>) and native (<i>Centaurea jacea, Crepis foetida</i>) Asteraceae species. In the first year, soil was conditioned by six native grassland species (three Asteraceae and three species from other families); while in the second year, we performed a pairwise competition experiment in pots between the four target and six native species in conditioned and control soils.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found that although the native species exerted a strong negative PSF on the performance of the target species, this effect mostly disappeared in the real presence of the native competitors. We also showed that the identity of native resident species is more important in determining PSF and competitive outcome than whether it is dominant or subordinate, or whether it is phylogenetically related to the target species.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We showed that PSF of native species may not influence the competitive outcome between invasive and resident native species, thus PSF does not significantly contribute to the invasion resistance of the studied grassland community.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vegetation Science","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvs.70042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plant–Soil Feedback Does Not Contribute to the Competitive Outcome Between Invasive and Resident Native Species in a Species-Rich Grassland\",\"authors\":\"Annamária Fenesi,&nbsp;Lilla Szőcs,&nbsp;Péter Török,&nbsp;Eszter Ruprecht\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jvs.70042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Question</h3>\\n \\n <p>Native and invasive species interact simultaneously with each other and with their species-specific soil biota, yet the relative importance of native plant–soil feedback (PSF) on the outcome of competition between these species with different origins is poorly understood. Therefore, we studied the influence of native PSF on the performance of two invasive and two native target species in two situations: (1) when the species were grown alone, and (2) when the target species were grown in pairwise competitive setup with the native conditioning species. We also tested the importance of phylogenetic relatedness between target and conditioning species on the simultaneous effect of PSF and competition.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cluj-Napoca, Romania.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used native species from a semi-dry grassland dominated by <i>Brachypodium pinnatum</i> and <i>Festuca rupicola</i> to study how their species-specific PSFs affect the performance of invasive (<i>Solidago canadensis, Erigeron canadensis</i>) and native (<i>Centaurea jacea, Crepis foetida</i>) Asteraceae species. In the first year, soil was conditioned by six native grassland species (three Asteraceae and three species from other families); while in the second year, we performed a pairwise competition experiment in pots between the four target and six native species in conditioned and control soils.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found that although the native species exerted a strong negative PSF on the performance of the target species, this effect mostly disappeared in the real presence of the native competitors. We also showed that the identity of native resident species is more important in determining PSF and competitive outcome than whether it is dominant or subordinate, or whether it is phylogenetically related to the target species.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>We showed that PSF of native species may not influence the competitive outcome between invasive and resident native species, thus PSF does not significantly contribute to the invasion resistance of the studied grassland community.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vegetation Science\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvs.70042\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vegetation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.70042\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.70042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原生物种和入侵物种同时相互作用,并与物种特有的土壤生物群相互作用,但原生植物-土壤反馈(PSF)对这些不同起源物种之间竞争结果的相对重要性知之甚少。因此,我们研究了两种情况下(1)入侵种和两种本地目标种单独生长和(2)目标种与本地调节种成对竞争生长时,本地PSF对两种入侵种和两种本地目标种性能的影响。我们还测试了目标物种和调节物种之间的系统发育亲缘关系对PSF和竞争同时效应的重要性。地点克卢日-纳波卡,罗马尼亚。方法以半干旱区短尾草和羊茅为优势种的本地种为研究对象,研究其物种特异性psf对入侵种(加拿大一枝黄花、加拿大毛茛)和本地种(半毛茛、Crepis foetida)的影响。第一年,土壤由6种原生草地物种(3种菊科和3种其他科)调节;第二年,我们在条件土壤和对照土壤中进行了4种目标种和6种本地种的盆栽配对竞争试验。结果发现,虽然本地物种对目标物种的表现有很强的负PSF影响,但这种影响在本地竞争对手存在时基本消失。我们还表明,在决定PSF和竞争结果方面,本地居民物种的身份比它是优势还是从属,或者它是否与目标物种有系统发育关系更重要。结论本研究表明,本地物种的PSF可能不会影响入侵物种与常驻物种之间的竞争结果,因此PSF对研究草地群落的入侵抵抗能力没有显著贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Plant–Soil Feedback Does Not Contribute to the Competitive Outcome Between Invasive and Resident Native Species in a Species-Rich Grassland

Plant–Soil Feedback Does Not Contribute to the Competitive Outcome Between Invasive and Resident Native Species in a Species-Rich Grassland

Question

Native and invasive species interact simultaneously with each other and with their species-specific soil biota, yet the relative importance of native plant–soil feedback (PSF) on the outcome of competition between these species with different origins is poorly understood. Therefore, we studied the influence of native PSF on the performance of two invasive and two native target species in two situations: (1) when the species were grown alone, and (2) when the target species were grown in pairwise competitive setup with the native conditioning species. We also tested the importance of phylogenetic relatedness between target and conditioning species on the simultaneous effect of PSF and competition.

Location

Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Methods

We used native species from a semi-dry grassland dominated by Brachypodium pinnatum and Festuca rupicola to study how their species-specific PSFs affect the performance of invasive (Solidago canadensis, Erigeron canadensis) and native (Centaurea jacea, Crepis foetida) Asteraceae species. In the first year, soil was conditioned by six native grassland species (three Asteraceae and three species from other families); while in the second year, we performed a pairwise competition experiment in pots between the four target and six native species in conditioned and control soils.

Results

We found that although the native species exerted a strong negative PSF on the performance of the target species, this effect mostly disappeared in the real presence of the native competitors. We also showed that the identity of native resident species is more important in determining PSF and competitive outcome than whether it is dominant or subordinate, or whether it is phylogenetically related to the target species.

Conclusions

We showed that PSF of native species may not influence the competitive outcome between invasive and resident native species, thus PSF does not significantly contribute to the invasion resistance of the studied grassland community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vegetation Science
Journal of Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
60
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vegetation Science publishes papers on all aspects of plant community ecology, with particular emphasis on papers that develop new concepts or methods, test theory, identify general patterns, or that are otherwise likely to interest a broad international readership. Papers may focus on any aspect of vegetation science, e.g. community structure (including community assembly and plant functional types), biodiversity (including species richness and composition), spatial patterns (including plant geography and landscape ecology), temporal changes (including demography, community dynamics and palaeoecology) and processes (including ecophysiology), provided the focus is on increasing our understanding of plant communities. The Journal publishes papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities. Papers that apply ecological concepts, theories and methods to the vegetation management, conservation and restoration, and papers on vegetation survey should be directed to our associate journal, Applied Vegetation Science journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信