Annamária Fenesi, Lilla Szőcs, Péter Török, Eszter Ruprecht
{"title":"在物种丰富的草原上,植物-土壤反馈对入侵物种和本地物种之间的竞争结果没有贡献","authors":"Annamária Fenesi, Lilla Szőcs, Péter Török, Eszter Ruprecht","doi":"10.1111/jvs.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Question</h3>\n \n <p>Native and invasive species interact simultaneously with each other and with their species-specific soil biota, yet the relative importance of native plant–soil feedback (PSF) on the outcome of competition between these species with different origins is poorly understood. Therefore, we studied the influence of native PSF on the performance of two invasive and two native target species in two situations: (1) when the species were grown alone, and (2) when the target species were grown in pairwise competitive setup with the native conditioning species. We also tested the importance of phylogenetic relatedness between target and conditioning species on the simultaneous effect of PSF and competition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Cluj-Napoca, Romania.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used native species from a semi-dry grassland dominated by <i>Brachypodium pinnatum</i> and <i>Festuca rupicola</i> to study how their species-specific PSFs affect the performance of invasive (<i>Solidago canadensis, Erigeron canadensis</i>) and native (<i>Centaurea jacea, Crepis foetida</i>) Asteraceae species. In the first year, soil was conditioned by six native grassland species (three Asteraceae and three species from other families); while in the second year, we performed a pairwise competition experiment in pots between the four target and six native species in conditioned and control soils.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found that although the native species exerted a strong negative PSF on the performance of the target species, this effect mostly disappeared in the real presence of the native competitors. We also showed that the identity of native resident species is more important in determining PSF and competitive outcome than whether it is dominant or subordinate, or whether it is phylogenetically related to the target species.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We showed that PSF of native species may not influence the competitive outcome between invasive and resident native species, thus PSF does not significantly contribute to the invasion resistance of the studied grassland community.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vegetation Science","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvs.70042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plant–Soil Feedback Does Not Contribute to the Competitive Outcome Between Invasive and Resident Native Species in a Species-Rich Grassland\",\"authors\":\"Annamária Fenesi, Lilla Szőcs, Péter Török, Eszter Ruprecht\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jvs.70042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Question</h3>\\n \\n <p>Native and invasive species interact simultaneously with each other and with their species-specific soil biota, yet the relative importance of native plant–soil feedback (PSF) on the outcome of competition between these species with different origins is poorly understood. Therefore, we studied the influence of native PSF on the performance of two invasive and two native target species in two situations: (1) when the species were grown alone, and (2) when the target species were grown in pairwise competitive setup with the native conditioning species. We also tested the importance of phylogenetic relatedness between target and conditioning species on the simultaneous effect of PSF and competition.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cluj-Napoca, Romania.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used native species from a semi-dry grassland dominated by <i>Brachypodium pinnatum</i> and <i>Festuca rupicola</i> to study how their species-specific PSFs affect the performance of invasive (<i>Solidago canadensis, Erigeron canadensis</i>) and native (<i>Centaurea jacea, Crepis foetida</i>) Asteraceae species. In the first year, soil was conditioned by six native grassland species (three Asteraceae and three species from other families); while in the second year, we performed a pairwise competition experiment in pots between the four target and six native species in conditioned and control soils.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found that although the native species exerted a strong negative PSF on the performance of the target species, this effect mostly disappeared in the real presence of the native competitors. We also showed that the identity of native resident species is more important in determining PSF and competitive outcome than whether it is dominant or subordinate, or whether it is phylogenetically related to the target species.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>We showed that PSF of native species may not influence the competitive outcome between invasive and resident native species, thus PSF does not significantly contribute to the invasion resistance of the studied grassland community.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vegetation Science\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvs.70042\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vegetation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.70042\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.70042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Plant–Soil Feedback Does Not Contribute to the Competitive Outcome Between Invasive and Resident Native Species in a Species-Rich Grassland
Question
Native and invasive species interact simultaneously with each other and with their species-specific soil biota, yet the relative importance of native plant–soil feedback (PSF) on the outcome of competition between these species with different origins is poorly understood. Therefore, we studied the influence of native PSF on the performance of two invasive and two native target species in two situations: (1) when the species were grown alone, and (2) when the target species were grown in pairwise competitive setup with the native conditioning species. We also tested the importance of phylogenetic relatedness between target and conditioning species on the simultaneous effect of PSF and competition.
Location
Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Methods
We used native species from a semi-dry grassland dominated by Brachypodium pinnatum and Festuca rupicola to study how their species-specific PSFs affect the performance of invasive (Solidago canadensis, Erigeron canadensis) and native (Centaurea jacea, Crepis foetida) Asteraceae species. In the first year, soil was conditioned by six native grassland species (three Asteraceae and three species from other families); while in the second year, we performed a pairwise competition experiment in pots between the four target and six native species in conditioned and control soils.
Results
We found that although the native species exerted a strong negative PSF on the performance of the target species, this effect mostly disappeared in the real presence of the native competitors. We also showed that the identity of native resident species is more important in determining PSF and competitive outcome than whether it is dominant or subordinate, or whether it is phylogenetically related to the target species.
Conclusions
We showed that PSF of native species may not influence the competitive outcome between invasive and resident native species, thus PSF does not significantly contribute to the invasion resistance of the studied grassland community.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vegetation Science publishes papers on all aspects of plant community ecology, with particular emphasis on papers that develop new concepts or methods, test theory, identify general patterns, or that are otherwise likely to interest a broad international readership. Papers may focus on any aspect of vegetation science, e.g. community structure (including community assembly and plant functional types), biodiversity (including species richness and composition), spatial patterns (including plant geography and landscape ecology), temporal changes (including demography, community dynamics and palaeoecology) and processes (including ecophysiology), provided the focus is on increasing our understanding of plant communities. The Journal publishes papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities. Papers that apply ecological concepts, theories and methods to the vegetation management, conservation and restoration, and papers on vegetation survey should be directed to our associate journal, Applied Vegetation Science journal.