单侧下挂窗通风模型的实验验证

IF 7.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Jun Jiang, Kai Rewitz, Dirk Müller
{"title":"单侧下挂窗通风模型的实验验证","authors":"Jun Jiang,&nbsp;Kai Rewitz,&nbsp;Dirk Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In Europe, single-sided natural ventilation through bottom-hung windows is widely used to improve indoor air quality and thermal comfort in buildings. Despite the existence of numerous empirical models to estimate its airflow rates, there is a lack of experimental model validation for this specific window opening design. This study evaluates the design characteristics and accuracy of existing empirical models for single-sided bottom-hung window ventilation by summarizing 12 models from publications, standards, and handbooks, analyzing their discrepancies, and assessing their performance based on experimental measurements. These models were compared in terms of considered factors, ventilation area definitions, and model sensitivity. The experimental validation involved 80 tracer gas measurements conducted over four months in a full-scale test bench under various weather conditions. Results revealed significant discrepancies in model performance, with most models underestimating airflow rates. Models specifically designed for bottom-hung windows demonstrated higher accuracy, whereas adapted models from simplified openings showed varied accuracy depending on the ventilation area definition. European and German standards consistently underestimated airflow rates, potentially leading to oversizing of window geometries and increased energy consumption. Conversely, the ASHRAE model significantly overestimated airflow rates due to its inappropriate wind-driven ventilation coefficient. Our study concludes that empirical models must be tailored to the specific characteristics of bottom-hung window configurations. Accurate modeling requires precise ventilation area definitions and incorporation of both buoyancy-driven and wind-driven ventilation mechanisms. Future research should focus on refining these models through in-situ calibration to enhance their applicability across diverse conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"282 ","pages":"Article 113253"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental validation of single-sided bottom-hung window ventilation models\",\"authors\":\"Jun Jiang,&nbsp;Kai Rewitz,&nbsp;Dirk Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In Europe, single-sided natural ventilation through bottom-hung windows is widely used to improve indoor air quality and thermal comfort in buildings. Despite the existence of numerous empirical models to estimate its airflow rates, there is a lack of experimental model validation for this specific window opening design. This study evaluates the design characteristics and accuracy of existing empirical models for single-sided bottom-hung window ventilation by summarizing 12 models from publications, standards, and handbooks, analyzing their discrepancies, and assessing their performance based on experimental measurements. These models were compared in terms of considered factors, ventilation area definitions, and model sensitivity. The experimental validation involved 80 tracer gas measurements conducted over four months in a full-scale test bench under various weather conditions. Results revealed significant discrepancies in model performance, with most models underestimating airflow rates. Models specifically designed for bottom-hung windows demonstrated higher accuracy, whereas adapted models from simplified openings showed varied accuracy depending on the ventilation area definition. European and German standards consistently underestimated airflow rates, potentially leading to oversizing of window geometries and increased energy consumption. Conversely, the ASHRAE model significantly overestimated airflow rates due to its inappropriate wind-driven ventilation coefficient. Our study concludes that empirical models must be tailored to the specific characteristics of bottom-hung window configurations. Accurate modeling requires precise ventilation area definitions and incorporation of both buoyancy-driven and wind-driven ventilation mechanisms. Future research should focus on refining these models through in-situ calibration to enhance their applicability across diverse conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building and Environment\",\"volume\":\"282 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325007334\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325007334","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧洲,通过下挂窗的单面自然通风被广泛采用,以改善建筑物的室内空气质量和热舒适性。尽管存在许多经验模型来估计其气流速率,但缺乏对这种特定窗开设计的实验模型验证。本研究通过总结出版物、标准和手册中的12个模型,分析其差异,并基于实验测量评估其性能,评估了现有单侧下挂窗通风经验模型的设计特征和准确性。根据考虑的因素、通风面积定义和模型敏感性对这些模型进行比较。实验验证涉及80个示踪气体测量,在各种天气条件下,在一个全尺寸测试台进行了四个多月的测量。结果显示了模型性能的显著差异,大多数模型低估了气流速率。专门为下挂窗设计的模型显示出更高的准确性,而简化开口的模型显示出不同的准确性,这取决于通风区域的定义。欧洲和德国的标准一直低估了气流速率,这可能导致窗户的几何形状过大,增加了能源消耗。相反,ASHRAE模型由于其不适当的风动通风系数而明显高估了气流速率。我们的研究得出的结论是,经验模型必须针对底挂窗配置的具体特征进行调整。准确的建模需要精确的通风区域定义,并结合浮力驱动和风驱动的通风机制。未来的研究应侧重于通过原位校准来完善这些模型,以增强其在不同条件下的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Experimental validation of single-sided bottom-hung window ventilation models

Experimental validation of single-sided bottom-hung window ventilation models
In Europe, single-sided natural ventilation through bottom-hung windows is widely used to improve indoor air quality and thermal comfort in buildings. Despite the existence of numerous empirical models to estimate its airflow rates, there is a lack of experimental model validation for this specific window opening design. This study evaluates the design characteristics and accuracy of existing empirical models for single-sided bottom-hung window ventilation by summarizing 12 models from publications, standards, and handbooks, analyzing their discrepancies, and assessing their performance based on experimental measurements. These models were compared in terms of considered factors, ventilation area definitions, and model sensitivity. The experimental validation involved 80 tracer gas measurements conducted over four months in a full-scale test bench under various weather conditions. Results revealed significant discrepancies in model performance, with most models underestimating airflow rates. Models specifically designed for bottom-hung windows demonstrated higher accuracy, whereas adapted models from simplified openings showed varied accuracy depending on the ventilation area definition. European and German standards consistently underestimated airflow rates, potentially leading to oversizing of window geometries and increased energy consumption. Conversely, the ASHRAE model significantly overestimated airflow rates due to its inappropriate wind-driven ventilation coefficient. Our study concludes that empirical models must be tailored to the specific characteristics of bottom-hung window configurations. Accurate modeling requires precise ventilation area definitions and incorporation of both buoyancy-driven and wind-driven ventilation mechanisms. Future research should focus on refining these models through in-situ calibration to enhance their applicability across diverse conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信