一种新的方法使用偏振nonius检验来评估近收敛点

IF 1.8 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Cristina Rovira-Gay , Marc Argilés , Luis Pérez-Maña , Bernat Sunyer-Grau
{"title":"一种新的方法使用偏振nonius检验来评估近收敛点","authors":"Cristina Rovira-Gay ,&nbsp;Marc Argilés ,&nbsp;Luis Pérez-Maña ,&nbsp;Bernat Sunyer-Grau","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2025.100563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a new method for measuring the near point of convergence (NPC) using a Nonius polarized target stimulus, comparing its sensitivity in detecting convergence ability to that of traditional approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective study, 65 participants underwent near point of convergence (NPC) measurements using three methods: an accommodative target (NPC1), a penlight with a red filter (NPC2), and a Nonius polarized target (NPC3). Participants also completed the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS). Statistical analyses, including repeated-measures ANOVA and Spearman’s correlation, were conducted to assess differences among the methods.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Nonius method demonstrated a median break point of 8.37 cm, significantly higher than the other methods, NPC1: 6.63 cm, and NPC2: 7.17 cm. Sensitivity for detecting CI symptoms was 92.6 % for the NPC3, which outperformed NPC1 (77.8 %) and NPC2 (74.1 %). NPC3 exhibited low specificity (7.4 %). Correlations between NPC measurements and CISS scores were weak and nonsignificant, though the strongest correlation was observed for NPC3</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Nonius polarized target method shows benefits compared to traditional methods in measuring NPC. This study provides a more sensitive method to measure convergence ability, reducing variability across clinical settings, and enhancing the reliability of assessments in both research and practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"18 3","pages":"Article 100563"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel approach using a polarized nonius test to evaluate the near point of convergence\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Rovira-Gay ,&nbsp;Marc Argilés ,&nbsp;Luis Pérez-Maña ,&nbsp;Bernat Sunyer-Grau\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optom.2025.100563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a new method for measuring the near point of convergence (NPC) using a Nonius polarized target stimulus, comparing its sensitivity in detecting convergence ability to that of traditional approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective study, 65 participants underwent near point of convergence (NPC) measurements using three methods: an accommodative target (NPC1), a penlight with a red filter (NPC2), and a Nonius polarized target (NPC3). Participants also completed the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS). Statistical analyses, including repeated-measures ANOVA and Spearman’s correlation, were conducted to assess differences among the methods.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Nonius method demonstrated a median break point of 8.37 cm, significantly higher than the other methods, NPC1: 6.63 cm, and NPC2: 7.17 cm. Sensitivity for detecting CI symptoms was 92.6 % for the NPC3, which outperformed NPC1 (77.8 %) and NPC2 (74.1 %). NPC3 exhibited low specificity (7.4 %). Correlations between NPC measurements and CISS scores were weak and nonsignificant, though the strongest correlation was observed for NPC3</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Nonius polarized target method shows benefits compared to traditional methods in measuring NPC. This study provides a more sensitive method to measure convergence ability, reducing variability across clinical settings, and enhancing the reliability of assessments in both research and practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429625000287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429625000287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价一种利用Nonius极化目标刺激测量近收敛点(NPC)的新方法的有效性,比较其检测收敛能力的灵敏度与传统方法的灵敏度。方法在这项前瞻性研究中,65名参与者使用三种方法进行近收敛点(NPC)测量:调节靶(NPC1),带红色滤光片的笔灯(NPC2)和Nonius偏振靶(NPC3)。参与者还完成了收敛不足症状调查(CISS)。统计分析包括重复测量方差分析和Spearman相关,以评估方法之间的差异。结果Nonius法的中位断点为8.37 cm,显著高于NPC1法的6.63 cm和NPC2法的7.17 cm。NPC3检测CI症状的灵敏度为92.6%,优于NPC1(77.8%)和NPC2(74.1%)。NPC3表现出低特异性(7.4%)。鼻咽癌测量值与CISS评分之间的相关性较弱且不显著,但npc3的相关性最强。结论与传统的鼻咽癌测量方法相比,Nonius极化靶法具有优势。这项研究提供了一种更灵敏的方法来测量收敛能力,减少临床环境中的变异性,并提高研究和实践中评估的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A novel approach using a polarized nonius test to evaluate the near point of convergence

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a new method for measuring the near point of convergence (NPC) using a Nonius polarized target stimulus, comparing its sensitivity in detecting convergence ability to that of traditional approaches.

Methods

In this prospective study, 65 participants underwent near point of convergence (NPC) measurements using three methods: an accommodative target (NPC1), a penlight with a red filter (NPC2), and a Nonius polarized target (NPC3). Participants also completed the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS). Statistical analyses, including repeated-measures ANOVA and Spearman’s correlation, were conducted to assess differences among the methods.

Results

The Nonius method demonstrated a median break point of 8.37 cm, significantly higher than the other methods, NPC1: 6.63 cm, and NPC2: 7.17 cm. Sensitivity for detecting CI symptoms was 92.6 % for the NPC3, which outperformed NPC1 (77.8 %) and NPC2 (74.1 %). NPC3 exhibited low specificity (7.4 %). Correlations between NPC measurements and CISS scores were weak and nonsignificant, though the strongest correlation was observed for NPC3

Conclusion

The Nonius polarized target method shows benefits compared to traditional methods in measuring NPC. This study provides a more sensitive method to measure convergence ability, reducing variability across clinical settings, and enhancing the reliability of assessments in both research and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信