Michal Grzmil , Muriel Aline Spahn , Philipp Berger , Roger Schibli , Martin Béhé
{"title":"放射性标记炸弹素类似物[177Lu]Lu-AMBA和[177Lu]Lu-RM2在胶质母细胞瘤模型中靶向GRPR的比较评价","authors":"Michal Grzmil , Muriel Aline Spahn , Philipp Berger , Roger Schibli , Martin Béhé","doi":"10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2025.109041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Radiolabeled agonist ligands bind to and activate target receptors, inducing internalization and delivering radionuclides into the inner cancer cells. In contrast, receptor-bound antagonizing radiopeptides inhibit receptor signaling and remain outside of the cells, but often show more favorable pharmacokinetics. Our head-to-head preclinical comparison of the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) antagonist and the agonist radioligands was conducted in a human glioblastoma (GBM) model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The cellular uptake of lutetium-177 labeled agonist [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-AMBA and antagonist [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-RM2 was evaluated through internalization assays in human GBM U-251 and breast cancer T47-D cells. Immunohistochemistry for γH2AX and the 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein-diacetate (DCFH-DA) probe were used to assess the induction of DNA double strand breaks (DSB) and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), respectively. An <em>in vivo</em> biodistribution study of the radiopeptides was conducted using U-251 xenografted nude mice. <em>Results</em>: Both [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-AMBA and [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-RM2 showed GRPR-specific uptake, whereby [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-AMBA was internalized in contrast to [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-RM2, which remained bound to the cell membrane. <em>In vitro</em> studies showed no significant difference in the total cellular uptake of radiopeptides. [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-RM2 binding to the receptor was blocked by the unlabeled AMBA ligand. Quantification of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-AMBA and [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-RM2-induced DSB and ROS levels revealed no significant difference in treated cells. <em>In vivo</em>, biodistribution showed increased tumor uptake of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-RM2 compared to [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-AMBA, whereby washout from receptor positive organs like pancreas, intestine, stomach, and spleen were significantly faster in [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-RM2-treated mice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study established targeting GRPR with both agonist and antagonist radioligands in glioma U-251 <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> models and recommends further development of antagonizing radiolabeled bombesin analog RM2, which showed <em>in vivo</em> superiority in tumor uptake and tumor-to-normal organ ratios (TNRs) over agonist AMBA radioligand.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19363,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear medicine and biology","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 109041"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of radiolabeled bombesin analogs [177Lu]Lu-AMBA and [177Lu]Lu-RM2 for targeting GRPR in glioblastoma model\",\"authors\":\"Michal Grzmil , Muriel Aline Spahn , Philipp Berger , Roger Schibli , Martin Béhé\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2025.109041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Radiolabeled agonist ligands bind to and activate target receptors, inducing internalization and delivering radionuclides into the inner cancer cells. In contrast, receptor-bound antagonizing radiopeptides inhibit receptor signaling and remain outside of the cells, but often show more favorable pharmacokinetics. Our head-to-head preclinical comparison of the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) antagonist and the agonist radioligands was conducted in a human glioblastoma (GBM) model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The cellular uptake of lutetium-177 labeled agonist [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-AMBA and antagonist [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-RM2 was evaluated through internalization assays in human GBM U-251 and breast cancer T47-D cells. Immunohistochemistry for γH2AX and the 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein-diacetate (DCFH-DA) probe were used to assess the induction of DNA double strand breaks (DSB) and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), respectively. An <em>in vivo</em> biodistribution study of the radiopeptides was conducted using U-251 xenografted nude mice. <em>Results</em>: Both [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-AMBA and [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-RM2 showed GRPR-specific uptake, whereby [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-AMBA was internalized in contrast to [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-RM2, which remained bound to the cell membrane. <em>In vitro</em> studies showed no significant difference in the total cellular uptake of radiopeptides. [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-RM2 binding to the receptor was blocked by the unlabeled AMBA ligand. Quantification of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-AMBA and [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-RM2-induced DSB and ROS levels revealed no significant difference in treated cells. <em>In vivo</em>, biodistribution showed increased tumor uptake of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-RM2 compared to [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-AMBA, whereby washout from receptor positive organs like pancreas, intestine, stomach, and spleen were significantly faster in [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-RM2-treated mice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study established targeting GRPR with both agonist and antagonist radioligands in glioma U-251 <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> models and recommends further development of antagonizing radiolabeled bombesin analog RM2, which showed <em>in vivo</em> superiority in tumor uptake and tumor-to-normal organ ratios (TNRs) over agonist AMBA radioligand.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969805125000502\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969805125000502","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
放射性标记的激动剂配体结合并激活靶受体,诱导内化并将放射性核素输送到癌细胞内部。相比之下,受体结合的拮抗放射性多肽抑制受体信号传导并留在细胞外,但通常表现出更有利的药代动力学。我们在人胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)模型中对胃泌素释放肽受体(GRPR)拮抗剂和受体拮抗剂放射配体进行了正面的临床前比较。方法通过内化实验,评价镥-177标记的激动剂[177Lu]Lu-AMBA和拮抗剂[177Lu]Lu-RM2在人GBM U-251和乳腺癌T47-D细胞中的细胞摄取情况。采用免疫组化γ - h2ax和2 ',7 ' -二氯荧光素-双乙酸酯(DCFH-DA)探针分别评估DNA双链断裂(DSB)和活性氧(ROS)的产生。用U-251异种移植裸鼠进行了放射性多肽的体内生物分布研究。结果:[177Lu]Lu-AMBA和[177Lu]Lu-RM2均显示grpr特异性摄取,[177Lu]Lu-AMBA被内化,而[177Lu]Lu-RM2仍与细胞膜结合。体外研究显示,在总细胞摄取的放射性多肽没有显著差异。[177Lu]Lu-RM2与受体的结合被未标记的AMBA配体阻断。[177Lu]Lu-AMBA和[177Lu] lu - rm2诱导的DSB和ROS水平在处理细胞中无显著差异。体内生物分布显示,与[177Lu]Lu-AMBA相比,[177Lu]Lu-RM2的肿瘤摄取增加,在[177Lu]Lu-RM2处理的小鼠中,来自受体阳性器官如胰腺、肠、胃和脾脏的冲洗明显更快。结论本研究在胶质瘤U-251体外和体内模型中建立了靶向GRPR的激动剂和拮抗剂放射配体,并建议进一步开发拮抗放射性标记的bombesin类似物RM2,其在体内肿瘤摄取和肿瘤与正常器官比率(TNRs)方面优于激动剂AMBA放射配体。
Comparative evaluation of radiolabeled bombesin analogs [177Lu]Lu-AMBA and [177Lu]Lu-RM2 for targeting GRPR in glioblastoma model
Introduction
Radiolabeled agonist ligands bind to and activate target receptors, inducing internalization and delivering radionuclides into the inner cancer cells. In contrast, receptor-bound antagonizing radiopeptides inhibit receptor signaling and remain outside of the cells, but often show more favorable pharmacokinetics. Our head-to-head preclinical comparison of the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) antagonist and the agonist radioligands was conducted in a human glioblastoma (GBM) model.
Methods
The cellular uptake of lutetium-177 labeled agonist [177Lu]Lu-AMBA and antagonist [177Lu]Lu-RM2 was evaluated through internalization assays in human GBM U-251 and breast cancer T47-D cells. Immunohistochemistry for γH2AX and the 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein-diacetate (DCFH-DA) probe were used to assess the induction of DNA double strand breaks (DSB) and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), respectively. An in vivo biodistribution study of the radiopeptides was conducted using U-251 xenografted nude mice. Results: Both [177Lu]Lu-AMBA and [177Lu]Lu-RM2 showed GRPR-specific uptake, whereby [177Lu]Lu-AMBA was internalized in contrast to [177Lu]Lu-RM2, which remained bound to the cell membrane. In vitro studies showed no significant difference in the total cellular uptake of radiopeptides. [177Lu]Lu-RM2 binding to the receptor was blocked by the unlabeled AMBA ligand. Quantification of [177Lu]Lu-AMBA and [177Lu]Lu-RM2-induced DSB and ROS levels revealed no significant difference in treated cells. In vivo, biodistribution showed increased tumor uptake of [177Lu]Lu-RM2 compared to [177Lu]Lu-AMBA, whereby washout from receptor positive organs like pancreas, intestine, stomach, and spleen were significantly faster in [177Lu]Lu-RM2-treated mice.
Conclusion
This study established targeting GRPR with both agonist and antagonist radioligands in glioma U-251 in vitro and in vivo models and recommends further development of antagonizing radiolabeled bombesin analog RM2, which showed in vivo superiority in tumor uptake and tumor-to-normal organ ratios (TNRs) over agonist AMBA radioligand.
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Medicine and Biology publishes original research addressing all aspects of radiopharmaceutical science: synthesis, in vitro and ex vivo studies, in vivo biodistribution by dissection or imaging, radiopharmacology, radiopharmacy, and translational clinical studies of new targeted radiotracers. The importance of the target to an unmet clinical need should be the first consideration. If the synthesis of a new radiopharmaceutical is submitted without in vitro or in vivo data, then the uniqueness of the chemistry must be emphasized.
These multidisciplinary studies should validate the mechanism of localization whether the probe is based on binding to a receptor, enzyme, tumor antigen, or another well-defined target. The studies should be aimed at evaluating how the chemical and radiopharmaceutical properties affect pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, or therapeutic efficacy. Ideally, the study would address the sensitivity of the probe to changes in disease or treatment, although studies validating mechanism alone are acceptable. Radiopharmacy practice, addressing the issues of preparation, automation, quality control, dispensing, and regulations applicable to qualification and administration of radiopharmaceuticals to humans, is an important aspect of the developmental process, but only if the study has a significant impact on the field.
Contributions on the subject of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals also are appropriate provided that the specificity of labeled compound localization and therapeutic effect have been addressed.