亚美尼亚卫生保健工作者对Covid-19疫苗接种运动的态度——问卷分析

Q3 Medicine

Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101137

A. Brotgandel , G. Ohan , D. Samvelian , M. Sahradyan , A.Z. Oxner , M.M. Ter-Stepanyan

{"title":"亚美尼亚卫生保健工作者对Covid-19疫苗接种运动的态度——问卷分析","authors":"A. Brotgandel , G. Ohan , D. Samvelian , M. Sahradyan , A.Z. Oxner , M.M. Ter-Stepanyan","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to measure healthcare workers’ opinions at two clinics in Yerevan, Armenia on the Covid-19 vaccine as well as a hypothetical future pandemic, focusing on their views of the best way to respond to it.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A survey was sent to all clinical and non-clinical staff, in 2024 and received 185 responses. The results of the survey given in 2024 were divided based on the profession of the healthcare workers, and they were compared to results from a similar survey given in 2021, that received 300 responses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results showed that healthcare workers’ reasons for getting vaccinated have changed as the pandemic has progressed from mainly being focused on government regulations in 2021 to the need to prevent infections and complications of infections in 2024. Additionally, healthcare workers in Armenia were still mostly hesitant about vaccination in the case of a future pandemic, with only 54.6% having heard of the need to prepare for the next pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The significance of this study stems from the understanding that specific cultural and historical factors impact vaccine hesitancy in a society. By considering what local factors affect acceptance of new vaccines in Armenia, new public health interventions can be developed for meeting the WHO goals of preparedness for “Pandemic X.” This study additionally emphasizes that the Armenian healthcare system is not prepared for the next pandemic, especially in reaching the expected threshold for herd immunity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health care workers’ attitude toward Covid-19 vaccination campaign in Armenia — A questionnaire analysis\",\"authors\":\"A. Brotgandel , G. Ohan , D. Samvelian , M. Sahradyan , A.Z. Oxner , M.M. Ter-Stepanyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to measure healthcare workers’ opinions at two clinics in Yerevan, Armenia on the Covid-19 vaccine as well as a hypothetical future pandemic, focusing on their views of the best way to respond to it.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A survey was sent to all clinical and non-clinical staff, in 2024 and received 185 responses. The results of the survey given in 2024 were divided based on the profession of the healthcare workers, and they were compared to results from a similar survey given in 2021, that received 300 responses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results showed that healthcare workers’ reasons for getting vaccinated have changed as the pandemic has progressed from mainly being focused on government regulations in 2021 to the need to prevent infections and complications of infections in 2024. Additionally, healthcare workers in Armenia were still mostly hesitant about vaccination in the case of a future pandemic, with only 54.6% having heard of the need to prepare for the next pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The significance of this study stems from the understanding that specific cultural and historical factors impact vaccine hesitancy in a society. By considering what local factors affect acceptance of new vaccines in Armenia, new public health interventions can be developed for meeting the WHO goals of preparedness for “Pandemic X.” This study additionally emphasizes that the Armenian healthcare system is not prepared for the next pandemic, especially in reaching the expected threshold for herd immunity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000969\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是测量亚美尼亚埃里温两家诊所的医护人员对Covid-19疫苗以及假设的未来大流行的看法，重点关注他们对应对疫情的最佳方式的看法。方法于2024年对所有临床及非临床工作人员进行问卷调查，共收到185份问卷。2024年的调查结果根据医护人员的专业进行了划分，并将其与2021年的类似调查结果进行了比较，该调查收到了300份回复。结果结果显示，随着疫情的发展，医护人员接种疫苗的原因发生了变化，从2021年主要关注政府法规，到2024年主要关注预防感染和感染并发症的需要。此外，亚美尼亚的卫生保健工作者在未来大流行的情况下对接种疫苗仍然大多犹豫不决，只有54.6%的人听说过需要为下一次大流行做准备。本研究的意义源于对特定文化和历史因素影响社会中疫苗犹豫的理解。通过考虑当地因素对亚美尼亚接受新疫苗的影响，可以制定新的公共卫生干预措施，以满足世卫组织为“x大流行”做好准备的目标。这项研究还强调，亚美尼亚卫生保健系统没有为下一次大流行做好准备，特别是在达到预期的群体免疫阈值方面。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Health care workers’ attitude toward Covid-19 vaccination campaign in Armenia — A questionnaire analysis

Objective

The purpose of this study was to measure healthcare workers’ opinions at two clinics in Yerevan, Armenia on the Covid-19 vaccine as well as a hypothetical future pandemic, focusing on their views of the best way to respond to it.

Method

A survey was sent to all clinical and non-clinical staff, in 2024 and received 185 responses. The results of the survey given in 2024 were divided based on the profession of the healthcare workers, and they were compared to results from a similar survey given in 2021, that received 300 responses.

Results

The results showed that healthcare workers’ reasons for getting vaccinated have changed as the pandemic has progressed from mainly being focused on government regulations in 2021 to the need to prevent infections and complications of infections in 2024. Additionally, healthcare workers in Armenia were still mostly hesitant about vaccination in the case of a future pandemic, with only 54.6% having heard of the need to prepare for the next pandemic.

Discussion

The significance of this study stems from the understanding that specific cultural and historical factors impact vaccine hesitancy in a society. By considering what local factors affect acceptance of new vaccines in Armenia, new public health interventions can be developed for meeting the WHO goals of preparedness for “Pandemic X.” This study additionally emphasizes that the Armenian healthcare system is not prepared for the next pandemic, especially in reaching the expected threshold for herd immunity.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

107

审稿时长

42 days

期刊介绍： This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.