Mariana Lendewig, Ronald Marquez, Jorge Franco, Ramon E. Vera, Keren A. Vivas, Naycari Forfora, Richard A. Venditti, Ronalds Gonzalez
{"title":"向不含PFAS的纤维基产品迈进:行业对纸包装、卫生和纺织产品法规的反应","authors":"Mariana Lendewig, Ronald Marquez, Jorge Franco, Ramon E. Vera, Keren A. Vivas, Naycari Forfora, Richard A. Venditti, Ronalds Gonzalez","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have played a critical role in the fiber-based industry for decades, primarily due to their ability to impart water and grease resistance to materials. However, increasing environmental and public health awareness has intensified regulatory scrutiny and driven a transition toward safer alternatives. Historically, the paper industry has depended on PFOA, PFOS, 6:2 FTOH, and PFBS to achieve the necessary barrier properties in food packaging, and these compounds continue to be detected in some products despite regulatory efforts to phase out PFAS. In the textile industry, over 72 distinct PFAS compounds have been identified, with PFOS and PFOA still prevalent. Similarly, in the hygiene products sector, FOA, 6:2 FTS, PFBA, and 6:2 diPAP have been detected in diapers, sanitary pads, and facemasks. Beyond legal liabilities for PFAS-related pollution, which have exceeded USD 54 million within the fiber-based industry, challenges linked to the disposal of PFAS-containing products, along with rising sustainability expectations from consumers, further intensify economic risks. Despite the comparable performance of emerging alternatives, treating paper with PFAS remains the most cost-effective option at USD 0.00012 per m<sup>2</sup>. In contrast, the higher costs of biobased alternative coatings, ranging from USD 0.015 to 0.98 per m<sup>2</sup>, could significantly impact cost structures unless the societal costs associated with PFAS pollution are accounted for. Estimates indicate that this transition could cost industry up to USD 12,500 million more than using PFAS treatments. Nonetheless, PFAS often deliver barrier performance that exceeds functional requirements in fiber-based products, particularly in single-use applications. Comparisons between PFAS and alternative technologies should therefore be based on the performance required for the intended application. Notably, major companies from the pulp and paper and textiles industries have already demonstrated that large-scale adoption of PFAS-free technologies is feasible while maintaining essential product performance. These findings indicate that with ongoing innovation and scaling, cost parity with PFAS-based products appears attainable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 108428"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moving toward fiber-based products free of PFAS: Industry response to regulations for paper packaging, hygiene and textile products\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Lendewig, Ronald Marquez, Jorge Franco, Ramon E. Vera, Keren A. Vivas, Naycari Forfora, Richard A. Venditti, Ronalds Gonzalez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have played a critical role in the fiber-based industry for decades, primarily due to their ability to impart water and grease resistance to materials. However, increasing environmental and public health awareness has intensified regulatory scrutiny and driven a transition toward safer alternatives. Historically, the paper industry has depended on PFOA, PFOS, 6:2 FTOH, and PFBS to achieve the necessary barrier properties in food packaging, and these compounds continue to be detected in some products despite regulatory efforts to phase out PFAS. In the textile industry, over 72 distinct PFAS compounds have been identified, with PFOS and PFOA still prevalent. Similarly, in the hygiene products sector, FOA, 6:2 FTS, PFBA, and 6:2 diPAP have been detected in diapers, sanitary pads, and facemasks. Beyond legal liabilities for PFAS-related pollution, which have exceeded USD 54 million within the fiber-based industry, challenges linked to the disposal of PFAS-containing products, along with rising sustainability expectations from consumers, further intensify economic risks. Despite the comparable performance of emerging alternatives, treating paper with PFAS remains the most cost-effective option at USD 0.00012 per m<sup>2</sup>. In contrast, the higher costs of biobased alternative coatings, ranging from USD 0.015 to 0.98 per m<sup>2</sup>, could significantly impact cost structures unless the societal costs associated with PFAS pollution are accounted for. Estimates indicate that this transition could cost industry up to USD 12,500 million more than using PFAS treatments. Nonetheless, PFAS often deliver barrier performance that exceeds functional requirements in fiber-based products, particularly in single-use applications. Comparisons between PFAS and alternative technologies should therefore be based on the performance required for the intended application. Notably, major companies from the pulp and paper and textiles industries have already demonstrated that large-scale adoption of PFAS-free technologies is feasible while maintaining essential product performance. These findings indicate that with ongoing innovation and scaling, cost parity with PFAS-based products appears attainable.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"222 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925003064\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925003064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Moving toward fiber-based products free of PFAS: Industry response to regulations for paper packaging, hygiene and textile products
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have played a critical role in the fiber-based industry for decades, primarily due to their ability to impart water and grease resistance to materials. However, increasing environmental and public health awareness has intensified regulatory scrutiny and driven a transition toward safer alternatives. Historically, the paper industry has depended on PFOA, PFOS, 6:2 FTOH, and PFBS to achieve the necessary barrier properties in food packaging, and these compounds continue to be detected in some products despite regulatory efforts to phase out PFAS. In the textile industry, over 72 distinct PFAS compounds have been identified, with PFOS and PFOA still prevalent. Similarly, in the hygiene products sector, FOA, 6:2 FTS, PFBA, and 6:2 diPAP have been detected in diapers, sanitary pads, and facemasks. Beyond legal liabilities for PFAS-related pollution, which have exceeded USD 54 million within the fiber-based industry, challenges linked to the disposal of PFAS-containing products, along with rising sustainability expectations from consumers, further intensify economic risks. Despite the comparable performance of emerging alternatives, treating paper with PFAS remains the most cost-effective option at USD 0.00012 per m2. In contrast, the higher costs of biobased alternative coatings, ranging from USD 0.015 to 0.98 per m2, could significantly impact cost structures unless the societal costs associated with PFAS pollution are accounted for. Estimates indicate that this transition could cost industry up to USD 12,500 million more than using PFAS treatments. Nonetheless, PFAS often deliver barrier performance that exceeds functional requirements in fiber-based products, particularly in single-use applications. Comparisons between PFAS and alternative technologies should therefore be based on the performance required for the intended application. Notably, major companies from the pulp and paper and textiles industries have already demonstrated that large-scale adoption of PFAS-free technologies is feasible while maintaining essential product performance. These findings indicate that with ongoing innovation and scaling, cost parity with PFAS-based products appears attainable.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.