向不含PFAS的纤维基产品迈进:行业对纸包装、卫生和纺织产品法规的反应

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Mariana Lendewig, Ronald Marquez, Jorge Franco, Ramon E. Vera, Keren A. Vivas, Naycari Forfora, Richard A. Venditti, Ronalds Gonzalez
{"title":"向不含PFAS的纤维基产品迈进:行业对纸包装、卫生和纺织产品法规的反应","authors":"Mariana Lendewig,&nbsp;Ronald Marquez,&nbsp;Jorge Franco,&nbsp;Ramon E. Vera,&nbsp;Keren A. Vivas,&nbsp;Naycari Forfora,&nbsp;Richard A. Venditti,&nbsp;Ronalds Gonzalez","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have played a critical role in the fiber-based industry for decades, primarily due to their ability to impart water and grease resistance to materials. However, increasing environmental and public health awareness has intensified regulatory scrutiny and driven a transition toward safer alternatives. Historically, the paper industry has depended on PFOA, PFOS, 6:2 FTOH, and PFBS to achieve the necessary barrier properties in food packaging, and these compounds continue to be detected in some products despite regulatory efforts to phase out PFAS. In the textile industry, over 72 distinct PFAS compounds have been identified, with PFOS and PFOA still prevalent. Similarly, in the hygiene products sector, FOA, 6:2 FTS, PFBA, and 6:2 diPAP have been detected in diapers, sanitary pads, and facemasks. Beyond legal liabilities for PFAS-related pollution, which have exceeded USD 54 million within the fiber-based industry, challenges linked to the disposal of PFAS-containing products, along with rising sustainability expectations from consumers, further intensify economic risks. Despite the comparable performance of emerging alternatives, treating paper with PFAS remains the most cost-effective option at USD 0.00012 per m<sup>2</sup>. In contrast, the higher costs of biobased alternative coatings, ranging from USD 0.015 to 0.98 per m<sup>2</sup>, could significantly impact cost structures unless the societal costs associated with PFAS pollution are accounted for. Estimates indicate that this transition could cost industry up to USD 12,500 million more than using PFAS treatments. Nonetheless, PFAS often deliver barrier performance that exceeds functional requirements in fiber-based products, particularly in single-use applications. Comparisons between PFAS and alternative technologies should therefore be based on the performance required for the intended application. Notably, major companies from the pulp and paper and textiles industries have already demonstrated that large-scale adoption of PFAS-free technologies is feasible while maintaining essential product performance. These findings indicate that with ongoing innovation and scaling, cost parity with PFAS-based products appears attainable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 108428"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moving toward fiber-based products free of PFAS: Industry response to regulations for paper packaging, hygiene and textile products\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Lendewig,&nbsp;Ronald Marquez,&nbsp;Jorge Franco,&nbsp;Ramon E. Vera,&nbsp;Keren A. Vivas,&nbsp;Naycari Forfora,&nbsp;Richard A. Venditti,&nbsp;Ronalds Gonzalez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have played a critical role in the fiber-based industry for decades, primarily due to their ability to impart water and grease resistance to materials. However, increasing environmental and public health awareness has intensified regulatory scrutiny and driven a transition toward safer alternatives. Historically, the paper industry has depended on PFOA, PFOS, 6:2 FTOH, and PFBS to achieve the necessary barrier properties in food packaging, and these compounds continue to be detected in some products despite regulatory efforts to phase out PFAS. In the textile industry, over 72 distinct PFAS compounds have been identified, with PFOS and PFOA still prevalent. Similarly, in the hygiene products sector, FOA, 6:2 FTS, PFBA, and 6:2 diPAP have been detected in diapers, sanitary pads, and facemasks. Beyond legal liabilities for PFAS-related pollution, which have exceeded USD 54 million within the fiber-based industry, challenges linked to the disposal of PFAS-containing products, along with rising sustainability expectations from consumers, further intensify economic risks. Despite the comparable performance of emerging alternatives, treating paper with PFAS remains the most cost-effective option at USD 0.00012 per m<sup>2</sup>. In contrast, the higher costs of biobased alternative coatings, ranging from USD 0.015 to 0.98 per m<sup>2</sup>, could significantly impact cost structures unless the societal costs associated with PFAS pollution are accounted for. Estimates indicate that this transition could cost industry up to USD 12,500 million more than using PFAS treatments. Nonetheless, PFAS often deliver barrier performance that exceeds functional requirements in fiber-based products, particularly in single-use applications. Comparisons between PFAS and alternative technologies should therefore be based on the performance required for the intended application. Notably, major companies from the pulp and paper and textiles industries have already demonstrated that large-scale adoption of PFAS-free technologies is feasible while maintaining essential product performance. These findings indicate that with ongoing innovation and scaling, cost parity with PFAS-based products appears attainable.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"222 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925003064\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925003064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)在纤维基工业中发挥了关键作用,主要是由于它们能够赋予材料耐水和耐脂性。然而,环境和公众健康意识的提高加强了监管审查,并推动了向更安全替代品的过渡。从历史上看,造纸业一直依赖于PFOA、PFOS、6:2 FTOH和PFBS来实现食品包装中必要的阻隔特性,尽管监管机构努力逐步淘汰PFAS,但这些化合物仍在一些产品中被检测到。在纺织工业中,已经鉴定出超过72种不同的全氟辛酸化合物,其中全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛酸仍然普遍存在。同样,在卫生用品领域,在尿布、卫生巾和口罩中检测到FOA、6:2 FTS、PFBA和6:2 dip pap。在纤维行业中,pfas相关污染的法律责任已超过5400万美元,除此之外,处理含pfas产品的挑战,以及消费者对可持续性的期望不断提高,进一步加剧了经济风险。尽管新兴替代品的性能相当,但用PFAS处理纸张仍然是最具成本效益的选择,每平方米0.00012美元。相比之下,生物基替代涂料的成本较高,从每平方米0.015美元到0.98美元不等,除非考虑到与PFAS污染相关的社会成本,否则可能会对成本结构产生重大影响。估计表明,与使用PFAS治疗相比,这种转变可能会使行业损失高达125亿美元。尽管如此,PFAS通常提供的屏障性能超出了纤维产品的功能要求,特别是在一次性应用中。因此,PFAS和替代技术之间的比较应该基于预期应用所需的性能。值得注意的是,纸浆、造纸和纺织行业的大公司已经证明,在保持基本产品性能的同时,大规模采用不含pfas的技术是可行的。这些发现表明,随着不断的创新和规模的扩大,与基于pfas的产品的成本相当是可以实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moving toward fiber-based products free of PFAS: Industry response to regulations for paper packaging, hygiene and textile products
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have played a critical role in the fiber-based industry for decades, primarily due to their ability to impart water and grease resistance to materials. However, increasing environmental and public health awareness has intensified regulatory scrutiny and driven a transition toward safer alternatives. Historically, the paper industry has depended on PFOA, PFOS, 6:2 FTOH, and PFBS to achieve the necessary barrier properties in food packaging, and these compounds continue to be detected in some products despite regulatory efforts to phase out PFAS. In the textile industry, over 72 distinct PFAS compounds have been identified, with PFOS and PFOA still prevalent. Similarly, in the hygiene products sector, FOA, 6:2 FTS, PFBA, and 6:2 diPAP have been detected in diapers, sanitary pads, and facemasks. Beyond legal liabilities for PFAS-related pollution, which have exceeded USD 54 million within the fiber-based industry, challenges linked to the disposal of PFAS-containing products, along with rising sustainability expectations from consumers, further intensify economic risks. Despite the comparable performance of emerging alternatives, treating paper with PFAS remains the most cost-effective option at USD 0.00012 per m2. In contrast, the higher costs of biobased alternative coatings, ranging from USD 0.015 to 0.98 per m2, could significantly impact cost structures unless the societal costs associated with PFAS pollution are accounted for. Estimates indicate that this transition could cost industry up to USD 12,500 million more than using PFAS treatments. Nonetheless, PFAS often deliver barrier performance that exceeds functional requirements in fiber-based products, particularly in single-use applications. Comparisons between PFAS and alternative technologies should therefore be based on the performance required for the intended application. Notably, major companies from the pulp and paper and textiles industries have already demonstrated that large-scale adoption of PFAS-free technologies is feasible while maintaining essential product performance. These findings indicate that with ongoing innovation and scaling, cost parity with PFAS-based products appears attainable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信