早期引入血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗肾移植受者高血压的安全性和有效性:一项使用倾向评分匹配的回顾性观察研究

IF 0.8
Shinsuke Kubo, Hiroshi Noguchi, Yu Hisadome, Kenji Ueki, Yuta Matsukuma, Shoji Tsuneyoshi, Yu Sato, Akihiro Tsuchimoto, Toshiaki Nakano, Keizo Kaku, Yasuhiro Okabe, Masafumi Nakamura
{"title":"早期引入血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗肾移植受者高血压的安全性和有效性:一项使用倾向评分匹配的回顾性观察研究","authors":"Shinsuke Kubo, Hiroshi Noguchi, Yu Hisadome, Kenji Ueki, Yuta Matsukuma, Shoji Tsuneyoshi, Yu Sato, Akihiro Tsuchimoto, Toshiaki Nakano, Keizo Kaku, Yasuhiro Okabe, Masafumi Nakamura","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kidney transplantation (KTx) is the optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease, but hypertension after KTx is significant complication affecting graft and patient survival. Although angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used, the effect of their \"early\" introduction on outcomes remains unclear. This retrospective observational cohort study compared KTx recipients who started ARBs within the first 14 days post-transplant (early ARB [eARB] group) to those ARBs initiated after three months (conventional group). Propensity score matching was used to align the groups. Blood pressure control, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and serum potassium levels, urinary protein, and adverse events were analyzed. Between 2020 and 2022, 174 patients underwent living-donor KTx. Propensity score matching refined this to 38 matched pairs (76 individuals), which were analyzed. No significant difference in blood pressure control was observed between the two groups at any time point. Results showed that eARB use led to significantly lower urinary protein levels at 3 months compared to the conventional group (P = .019). There were no significant differences in adverse events, including hyperkalemia, rejection, or hypotension, between groups. Potassium-lowering agents were used slightly more in the eARB group, but the difference was not significant. Although eARBs initiation appears safe and potentially beneficial for kidney transplant recipients, further studies are needed to fully understand the long-term implications of this strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94258,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Efficacy of Early Introduction of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers for Hypertension in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Observational Study Using Propensity Score Matching.\",\"authors\":\"Shinsuke Kubo, Hiroshi Noguchi, Yu Hisadome, Kenji Ueki, Yuta Matsukuma, Shoji Tsuneyoshi, Yu Sato, Akihiro Tsuchimoto, Toshiaki Nakano, Keizo Kaku, Yasuhiro Okabe, Masafumi Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Kidney transplantation (KTx) is the optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease, but hypertension after KTx is significant complication affecting graft and patient survival. Although angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used, the effect of their \\\"early\\\" introduction on outcomes remains unclear. This retrospective observational cohort study compared KTx recipients who started ARBs within the first 14 days post-transplant (early ARB [eARB] group) to those ARBs initiated after three months (conventional group). Propensity score matching was used to align the groups. Blood pressure control, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and serum potassium levels, urinary protein, and adverse events were analyzed. Between 2020 and 2022, 174 patients underwent living-donor KTx. Propensity score matching refined this to 38 matched pairs (76 individuals), which were analyzed. No significant difference in blood pressure control was observed between the two groups at any time point. Results showed that eARB use led to significantly lower urinary protein levels at 3 months compared to the conventional group (P = .019). There were no significant differences in adverse events, including hyperkalemia, rejection, or hypotension, between groups. Potassium-lowering agents were used slightly more in the eARB group, but the difference was not significant. Although eARBs initiation appears safe and potentially beneficial for kidney transplant recipients, further studies are needed to fully understand the long-term implications of this strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.05.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.05.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肾移植(KTx)是终末期肾病的最佳治疗方法,但KTx后的高血压是影响移植和患者生存的重要并发症。尽管血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARBs)被广泛使用,但其“早期”引入对预后的影响尚不清楚。这项回顾性观察队列研究比较了移植后14天内开始ARB的KTx受体(早期ARB组)和移植后3个月后开始ARB的KTx受体(常规组)。使用倾向评分匹配来对齐组。分析血压控制、估计肾小球滤过率、血清钾水平、尿蛋白和不良事件。在2020年至2022年期间,174名患者接受了活体供体KTx。倾向评分匹配将其细化为38对(76个人),并对其进行分析。两组在任何时间点的血压控制均无显著差异。结果显示,与常规组相比,使用eARB组在3个月时尿蛋白水平显著降低(P = 0.019)。两组之间的不良事件无显著差异,包括高钾血症、排斥反应或低血压。eARB组使用的降钾药物略多,但差异不显著。虽然启动eARBs似乎是安全的,并且对肾移植受者有潜在的益处,但需要进一步的研究来充分了解这一策略的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and Efficacy of Early Introduction of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers for Hypertension in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Observational Study Using Propensity Score Matching.

Kidney transplantation (KTx) is the optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease, but hypertension after KTx is significant complication affecting graft and patient survival. Although angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used, the effect of their "early" introduction on outcomes remains unclear. This retrospective observational cohort study compared KTx recipients who started ARBs within the first 14 days post-transplant (early ARB [eARB] group) to those ARBs initiated after three months (conventional group). Propensity score matching was used to align the groups. Blood pressure control, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and serum potassium levels, urinary protein, and adverse events were analyzed. Between 2020 and 2022, 174 patients underwent living-donor KTx. Propensity score matching refined this to 38 matched pairs (76 individuals), which were analyzed. No significant difference in blood pressure control was observed between the two groups at any time point. Results showed that eARB use led to significantly lower urinary protein levels at 3 months compared to the conventional group (P = .019). There were no significant differences in adverse events, including hyperkalemia, rejection, or hypotension, between groups. Potassium-lowering agents were used slightly more in the eARB group, but the difference was not significant. Although eARBs initiation appears safe and potentially beneficial for kidney transplant recipients, further studies are needed to fully understand the long-term implications of this strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信