医疗与放射肿瘤学医疗保险报销趋势分析。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Jacob S Hogan, John C Baumann, Neha Vapiwala, Jeff M Michalski, Benjamin W Fischer-Valuck, Patty Karraker, Minesh P Mehta, Jeffrey D Bradley, Brian C Baumann
{"title":"医疗与放射肿瘤学医疗保险报销趋势分析。","authors":"Jacob S Hogan, John C Baumann, Neha Vapiwala, Jeff M Michalski, Benjamin W Fischer-Valuck, Patty Karraker, Minesh P Mehta, Jeffrey D Bradley, Brian C Baumann","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2025.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Radiation and medical oncology face pressure from payment changes, which aim to increase the value of care and curb rising spending. Multiple models have been proposed or implemented, with mixed results for cost saving and financial stability. While previous studies have quantified changes in Medicare reimbursement for radiation oncology on a per-code basis, this has not been done in medical oncology to our knowledge, and no direct comparisons have been made between oncology subspecialties at this level. Our study aims to quantify and analyze Medicare reimbursement changes for medical and radiation oncology billing codes.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>In this longitudinal study of reimbursement, the publicly available Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary database was used to obtain Medicare reimbursement data for 2010, 2016, and 2020. All reimbursement for providers with primary provider codes 92 (radiation oncology), 83 (hematology oncology), and 90 (medical oncology) were analyzed, combining hematology and medical oncology. Inflation- and utilization-adjusted changes in reimbursement were calculated from 2010-2020 and 2016-2020 on a per-code basis with results grouped by specialty and billing category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2010-2020, inflation- and utilization-adjusted Medicare reimbursement decreased by $1.2B (-16%) for all codes, $705M (-29%) for radiation oncology-specific codes, and $541M (-10%) for medical oncology-specific codes. From 2016-2020, inflation- and utilization-adjusted reimbursement decreased by $299M (-3%) for all codes, $108M (-5.6%) for radiation oncology-specific codes, and $191M (-2.2%) for medical oncology-specific codes. Chemotherapy (-40%) and radiotherapy (-33%) saw the largest decreases in inflation- and utilization-adjusted reimbursement from 2010-2020, while immunotherapy (+21%) saw the largest increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis shows continually decreasing Medicare reimbursement for both radiation and medical oncology from 2010-2020 and 2016-2020. This decade-long continuous decline highlights the need for payment system stabilization-whether through episode-based payment models or another avenue.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Medicare Reimbursement Trends in Medical and Radiation Oncology.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob S Hogan, John C Baumann, Neha Vapiwala, Jeff M Michalski, Benjamin W Fischer-Valuck, Patty Karraker, Minesh P Mehta, Jeffrey D Bradley, Brian C Baumann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prro.2025.05.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Radiation and medical oncology face pressure from payment changes, which aim to increase the value of care and curb rising spending. Multiple models have been proposed or implemented, with mixed results for cost saving and financial stability. While previous studies have quantified changes in Medicare reimbursement for radiation oncology on a per-code basis, this has not been done in medical oncology to our knowledge, and no direct comparisons have been made between oncology subspecialties at this level. Our study aims to quantify and analyze Medicare reimbursement changes for medical and radiation oncology billing codes.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>In this longitudinal study of reimbursement, the publicly available Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary database was used to obtain Medicare reimbursement data for 2010, 2016, and 2020. All reimbursement for providers with primary provider codes 92 (radiation oncology), 83 (hematology oncology), and 90 (medical oncology) were analyzed, combining hematology and medical oncology. Inflation- and utilization-adjusted changes in reimbursement were calculated from 2010-2020 and 2016-2020 on a per-code basis with results grouped by specialty and billing category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2010-2020, inflation- and utilization-adjusted Medicare reimbursement decreased by $1.2B (-16%) for all codes, $705M (-29%) for radiation oncology-specific codes, and $541M (-10%) for medical oncology-specific codes. From 2016-2020, inflation- and utilization-adjusted reimbursement decreased by $299M (-3%) for all codes, $108M (-5.6%) for radiation oncology-specific codes, and $191M (-2.2%) for medical oncology-specific codes. Chemotherapy (-40%) and radiotherapy (-33%) saw the largest decreases in inflation- and utilization-adjusted reimbursement from 2010-2020, while immunotherapy (+21%) saw the largest increase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis shows continually decreasing Medicare reimbursement for both radiation and medical oncology from 2010-2020 and 2016-2020. This decade-long continuous decline highlights the need for payment system stabilization-whether through episode-based payment models or another avenue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2025.05.011\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2025.05.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:放射和肿瘤医学面临着支付改革的压力,旨在提高护理的价值,遏制不断增长的支出。已经提出或实施了多种模型,在节约成本和金融稳定方面的结果喜忧参半。虽然以前的研究已经量化了每个代码基础上放射肿瘤学医疗保险报销的变化,但据我们所知,这还没有在医学肿瘤学中进行过,也没有在这个水平上对肿瘤亚专科进行过直接比较。我们的研究旨在量化和分析医疗和放射肿瘤学账单代码的医疗保险报销变化。材料/方法:在这项报销的纵向研究中,使用公开的医生/供应商程序摘要数据库获取2010年、2016年和2020年的医疗保险报销数据。结合血液学和肿瘤学,分析了初级提供者代码为92(放射肿瘤学)、83(血液学肿瘤学)和90(医学肿瘤学)的提供者的所有报销情况。在2010-2020年和2016-2020年期间,按每个代码计算通货膨胀和利用调整后的报销变化,并按专业和计费类别分组。结果:从2010-2020年,通货膨胀和利用调整后的医疗保险报销减少了12亿美元(-16%),放射肿瘤特异性代码减少了7.05亿美元(-29%),医学肿瘤特异性代码减少了5.41亿美元(-10%)。从2016年到2020年,通货膨胀和利用调整后的所有代码报销减少了2.99亿美元(-3%),放射肿瘤学特定代码报销减少了1.08亿美元(-5.6%),医学肿瘤学特定代码报销减少了1.91亿美元(-2.2%)。化疗(-40%)和放疗(-33%)在通货膨胀和利用调整后的报销中降幅最大,而免疫治疗(+21%)增幅最大。结论:我们的分析显示,2010-2020年和2016-2020年期间,放射和肿瘤医疗保险报销持续下降。这种长达十年的持续下降凸显了支付系统稳定的必要性——无论是通过基于情节的支付模式还是其他途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Medicare Reimbursement Trends in Medical and Radiation Oncology.

Purpose: Radiation and medical oncology face pressure from payment changes, which aim to increase the value of care and curb rising spending. Multiple models have been proposed or implemented, with mixed results for cost saving and financial stability. While previous studies have quantified changes in Medicare reimbursement for radiation oncology on a per-code basis, this has not been done in medical oncology to our knowledge, and no direct comparisons have been made between oncology subspecialties at this level. Our study aims to quantify and analyze Medicare reimbursement changes for medical and radiation oncology billing codes.

Materials/methods: In this longitudinal study of reimbursement, the publicly available Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary database was used to obtain Medicare reimbursement data for 2010, 2016, and 2020. All reimbursement for providers with primary provider codes 92 (radiation oncology), 83 (hematology oncology), and 90 (medical oncology) were analyzed, combining hematology and medical oncology. Inflation- and utilization-adjusted changes in reimbursement were calculated from 2010-2020 and 2016-2020 on a per-code basis with results grouped by specialty and billing category.

Results: From 2010-2020, inflation- and utilization-adjusted Medicare reimbursement decreased by $1.2B (-16%) for all codes, $705M (-29%) for radiation oncology-specific codes, and $541M (-10%) for medical oncology-specific codes. From 2016-2020, inflation- and utilization-adjusted reimbursement decreased by $299M (-3%) for all codes, $108M (-5.6%) for radiation oncology-specific codes, and $191M (-2.2%) for medical oncology-specific codes. Chemotherapy (-40%) and radiotherapy (-33%) saw the largest decreases in inflation- and utilization-adjusted reimbursement from 2010-2020, while immunotherapy (+21%) saw the largest increase.

Conclusions: Our analysis shows continually decreasing Medicare reimbursement for both radiation and medical oncology from 2010-2020 and 2016-2020. This decade-long continuous decline highlights the need for payment system stabilization-whether through episode-based payment models or another avenue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信