马拉维COVID-19风险沟通和社区参与方法的经验教训:一项探索性研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Chiyembekezo Focus Maganga, Lusizi Kambalame, Aeron M A Nahuku, Victor Lordwin Chikoti
{"title":"马拉维COVID-19风险沟通和社区参与方法的经验教训:一项探索性研究。","authors":"Chiyembekezo Focus Maganga, Lusizi Kambalame, Aeron M A Nahuku, Victor Lordwin Chikoti","doi":"10.1080/17482631.2025.2516356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>During public health emergencies like COVID-19, approaches used in Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) are critical in the process of transmitting and exchanging health information. However, there is generally limited literature on COVID-19 RCCE approaches, particularly their strengths and limitations. The current study seeks to contribute to that literature by exploring approaches that were used in COVID-19 RCCE in Malawi, a sub-Saharan African (SSA) country, and drawing lessons from the response based on experiences of those who implemented it.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using in-depth interviews with ten key informants and ten project reports from three organizations, data were analysed thematically in MAXQDA 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant themes that emerged revealed COVID-19 RCCE employed use of interpersonal approaches like training, peer education, mHealth and social media; use of community mobilization strategies like engagement meetings and dialogues, loud hearing through mobile vans and whistle stops; behaviour change printed materials; and the mass media. Effectiveness hinged on each method's accessibility, intrinsic qualities, and reach. Implementers also emphasized the value of combining multiple approaches and the challenges posed by COVID-19 restrictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study underscores the need to select context-appropriate, accessible RCCE approaches to convey critical information, and contributes to the evidence base for future pandemic responses, especially in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51468,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","volume":"20 1","pages":"2516356"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons learned from approaches in COVID-19 risk Communication and community engagement in Malawi: an exploratory study.\",\"authors\":\"Chiyembekezo Focus Maganga, Lusizi Kambalame, Aeron M A Nahuku, Victor Lordwin Chikoti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17482631.2025.2516356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>During public health emergencies like COVID-19, approaches used in Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) are critical in the process of transmitting and exchanging health information. However, there is generally limited literature on COVID-19 RCCE approaches, particularly their strengths and limitations. The current study seeks to contribute to that literature by exploring approaches that were used in COVID-19 RCCE in Malawi, a sub-Saharan African (SSA) country, and drawing lessons from the response based on experiences of those who implemented it.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using in-depth interviews with ten key informants and ten project reports from three organizations, data were analysed thematically in MAXQDA 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant themes that emerged revealed COVID-19 RCCE employed use of interpersonal approaches like training, peer education, mHealth and social media; use of community mobilization strategies like engagement meetings and dialogues, loud hearing through mobile vans and whistle stops; behaviour change printed materials; and the mass media. Effectiveness hinged on each method's accessibility, intrinsic qualities, and reach. Implementers also emphasized the value of combining multiple approaches and the challenges posed by COVID-19 restrictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study underscores the need to select context-appropriate, accessible RCCE approaches to convey critical information, and contributes to the evidence base for future pandemic responses, especially in resource-limited settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"2516356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12164384/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2025.2516356\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2025.2516356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在COVID-19等突发公共卫生事件期间,风险沟通和社区参与(RCCE)中使用的方法在传递和交换卫生信息的过程中至关重要。然而,关于COVID-19 RCCE方法的文献普遍有限,特别是它们的优势和局限性。本研究旨在通过探索撒哈拉以南非洲国家马拉维在COVID-19 RCCE中使用的方法,并根据实施者的经验从应对措施中吸取教训,为这些文献做出贡献。方法:通过对10名关键线人的深度访谈和来自3个组织的10份项目报告,对MAXQDA 2022的数据进行主题分析。结果:出现的重要主题揭示了COVID-19 RCCE采用了人际关系方法,如培训、同伴教育、移动医疗和社交媒体;使用社区动员策略,如参与会议和对话,通过流动货车和哨子进行大声聆听;行为改变印刷材料;还有大众媒体。有效性取决于每种方法的可及性、内在品质和可及范围。实施者还强调了将多种方法结合起来的价值以及COVID-19限制带来的挑战。结论:该研究强调需要选择适合具体情况的、可获取的RCCE方法来传达关键信息,并有助于为未来的大流行应对提供证据基础,特别是在资源有限的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lessons learned from approaches in COVID-19 risk Communication and community engagement in Malawi: an exploratory study.

Purpose: During public health emergencies like COVID-19, approaches used in Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) are critical in the process of transmitting and exchanging health information. However, there is generally limited literature on COVID-19 RCCE approaches, particularly their strengths and limitations. The current study seeks to contribute to that literature by exploring approaches that were used in COVID-19 RCCE in Malawi, a sub-Saharan African (SSA) country, and drawing lessons from the response based on experiences of those who implemented it.

Method: Using in-depth interviews with ten key informants and ten project reports from three organizations, data were analysed thematically in MAXQDA 2022.

Results: Significant themes that emerged revealed COVID-19 RCCE employed use of interpersonal approaches like training, peer education, mHealth and social media; use of community mobilization strategies like engagement meetings and dialogues, loud hearing through mobile vans and whistle stops; behaviour change printed materials; and the mass media. Effectiveness hinged on each method's accessibility, intrinsic qualities, and reach. Implementers also emphasized the value of combining multiple approaches and the challenges posed by COVID-19 restrictions.

Conclusion: The study underscores the need to select context-appropriate, accessible RCCE approaches to convey critical information, and contributes to the evidence base for future pandemic responses, especially in resource-limited settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
99
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being acknowledges the international and interdisciplinary nature of health-related issues. It intends to provide a meeting-point for studies using rigorous qualitative methodology of significance for issues related to human health and well-being. The aim of the International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being is to support and to shape the emerging field of qualitative studies and to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of human health and well-being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信