日本养老社会工作者的伦理困境与价值冲突。

IF 1.8 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-12 DOI:10.1007/s11673-025-10421-y
C Unozawa, M Tsuruwaka
{"title":"日本养老社会工作者的伦理困境与价值冲突。","authors":"C Unozawa, M Tsuruwaka","doi":"10.1007/s11673-025-10421-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Social workers (SWs) who support older people encounter ethical dilemmas and experience value conflicts when working with other professionals while fulfilling their responsibilities. We explored these experiences by interviewing SWs engaged in care for older people in Japan. Methods We conducted a qualitative interview survey with a targeted sample, employing a narrative analysis method. The participants included twenty-one SWs (four male, seventeen female) employed across acute-care hospitals, convalescent rehabilitation hospitals, home healthcare, and nursing homes. Results SWs described experiences of ethical dilemmas in supporting older people due to conflicting obligations and value priorities. They highly prioritize understanding the life backgrounds and values of patients to be able to discharge their duty to advocate patient autonomy and promote the best interest of the patients. However, SWs faced ethical dilemmas due to their responsibility to the organization, conflicting obligations toward the patient's family versus the patient's wishes, and differing prioritized values compared with medical professionals who prioritize the patient's physical function. Additionally, the relationship between SWs and medical professionals poses challenges in addressing these ethical dilemmas. Conclusion It is crucial to appreciate the significance of individuals from diverse professions by comprehending their respective roles and specialties, fostering equitable relationships, and capitalizing on their distinct expertise through collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":"441-456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical Dilemmas and Value Conflicts Experienced by Japanese Social Workers Supporting Older People.\",\"authors\":\"C Unozawa, M Tsuruwaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11673-025-10421-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Social workers (SWs) who support older people encounter ethical dilemmas and experience value conflicts when working with other professionals while fulfilling their responsibilities. We explored these experiences by interviewing SWs engaged in care for older people in Japan. Methods We conducted a qualitative interview survey with a targeted sample, employing a narrative analysis method. The participants included twenty-one SWs (four male, seventeen female) employed across acute-care hospitals, convalescent rehabilitation hospitals, home healthcare, and nursing homes. Results SWs described experiences of ethical dilemmas in supporting older people due to conflicting obligations and value priorities. They highly prioritize understanding the life backgrounds and values of patients to be able to discharge their duty to advocate patient autonomy and promote the best interest of the patients. However, SWs faced ethical dilemmas due to their responsibility to the organization, conflicting obligations toward the patient's family versus the patient's wishes, and differing prioritized values compared with medical professionals who prioritize the patient's physical function. Additionally, the relationship between SWs and medical professionals poses challenges in addressing these ethical dilemmas. Conclusion It is crucial to appreciate the significance of individuals from diverse professions by comprehending their respective roles and specialties, fostering equitable relationships, and capitalizing on their distinct expertise through collaboration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"441-456\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10421-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10421-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

支持长者的社工在履行职责的同时,与其他专业人士合作时,会遇到道德困境和价值观冲突。我们通过采访在日本从事老年人护理工作的社会福利工作者来探索这些经历。方法采用叙事分析法,对有针对性的样本进行定性访谈调查。参与者包括21名社会服务人员(4名男性,17名女性),他们分别在急症护理医院、康复医院、家庭保健和疗养院工作。结果社会福利工作者描述了由于义务和价值优先冲突而导致的支持老年人的道德困境的经历。他们高度重视了解患者的生活背景和价值观,以便能够履行自己的职责,倡导患者的自主权,促进患者的最大利益。然而,由于他们对组织的责任,对患者家庭的义务与患者的意愿相冲突,以及与优先考虑患者身体功能的医疗专业人员不同的优先价值观,SWs面临着伦理困境。此外,社会福利工作者和医疗专业人员之间的关系对解决这些道德困境提出了挑战。通过理解来自不同职业的个人的各自角色和专长,培养公平的关系,并通过合作利用他们独特的专业知识,认识他们的重要性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical Dilemmas and Value Conflicts Experienced by Japanese Social Workers Supporting Older People.

Background Social workers (SWs) who support older people encounter ethical dilemmas and experience value conflicts when working with other professionals while fulfilling their responsibilities. We explored these experiences by interviewing SWs engaged in care for older people in Japan. Methods We conducted a qualitative interview survey with a targeted sample, employing a narrative analysis method. The participants included twenty-one SWs (four male, seventeen female) employed across acute-care hospitals, convalescent rehabilitation hospitals, home healthcare, and nursing homes. Results SWs described experiences of ethical dilemmas in supporting older people due to conflicting obligations and value priorities. They highly prioritize understanding the life backgrounds and values of patients to be able to discharge their duty to advocate patient autonomy and promote the best interest of the patients. However, SWs faced ethical dilemmas due to their responsibility to the organization, conflicting obligations toward the patient's family versus the patient's wishes, and differing prioritized values compared with medical professionals who prioritize the patient's physical function. Additionally, the relationship between SWs and medical professionals poses challenges in addressing these ethical dilemmas. Conclusion It is crucial to appreciate the significance of individuals from diverse professions by comprehending their respective roles and specialties, fostering equitable relationships, and capitalizing on their distinct expertise through collaboration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JBI welcomes both reports of empirical research and articles that increase theoretical understanding of medicine and health care, the health professions and the biological sciences. The JBI is also open to critical reflections on medicine and conventional bioethics, the nature of health, illness and disability, the sources of ethics, the nature of ethical communities, and possible implications of new developments in science and technology for social and cultural life and human identity. We welcome contributions from perspectives that are less commonly published in existing journals in the field and reports of empirical research studies using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. The JBI accepts contributions from authors working in or across disciplines including – but not limited to – the following: -philosophy- bioethics- economics- social theory- law- public health and epidemiology- anthropology- psychology- feminism- gay and lesbian studies- linguistics and discourse analysis- cultural studies- disability studies- history- literature and literary studies- environmental sciences- theology and religious studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信