人格功能水平量表的内部结构与一致性:系统回顾与元分析。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Luis Hualparuca-Olivera, Elsa Vigo-Ayasta, Julio Torales, Cristian Ramos-Vera, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Margarita Calle-Arancibia, Agueda Muñoz-Del-Carpio-Toia, Antonio Ventriglio, Bo Bach
{"title":"人格功能水平量表的内部结构与一致性:系统回顾与元分析。","authors":"Luis Hualparuca-Olivera, Elsa Vigo-Ayasta, Julio Torales, Cristian Ramos-Vera, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Margarita Calle-Arancibia, Agueda Muñoz-Del-Carpio-Toia, Antonio Ventriglio, Bo Bach","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2025.39.3.223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess the internal structure and consistency of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0) across different populations and cultures. Studies identified through systematic research were subjected to eligibility criteria, resulting in 30 included studies and 110 effect sizes. Study characteristics were tabulated, their methodological quality was assessed, and findings were synthesized using a random-effects meta-analysis. Findings overall supported the internal structure of the LPFS-BF 2.0 and indicated sound internal consistency for the total scale. Moderator analyses indicated that internal consistency differed minimally by index type, sample type, gender, age, country, and language. The findings overall suggest that the LPFS-BF 2.0 assesses a coherent and internally consistent construct, making it a potentially useful tool for evaluating personality functioning across diverse populations. Future investigations should further explore interrater reliability, test-retest stability, and alignment with interview-based personality disorder severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"39 3","pages":"223-239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internal Structure and Consistency of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Luis Hualparuca-Olivera, Elsa Vigo-Ayasta, Julio Torales, Cristian Ramos-Vera, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Margarita Calle-Arancibia, Agueda Muñoz-Del-Carpio-Toia, Antonio Ventriglio, Bo Bach\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/pedi.2025.39.3.223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess the internal structure and consistency of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0) across different populations and cultures. Studies identified through systematic research were subjected to eligibility criteria, resulting in 30 included studies and 110 effect sizes. Study characteristics were tabulated, their methodological quality was assessed, and findings were synthesized using a random-effects meta-analysis. Findings overall supported the internal structure of the LPFS-BF 2.0 and indicated sound internal consistency for the total scale. Moderator analyses indicated that internal consistency differed minimally by index type, sample type, gender, age, country, and language. The findings overall suggest that the LPFS-BF 2.0 assesses a coherent and internally consistent construct, making it a potentially useful tool for evaluating personality functioning across diverse populations. Future investigations should further explore interrater reliability, test-retest stability, and alignment with interview-based personality disorder severity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personality Disorders\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"223-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personality Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2025.39.3.223\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2025.39.3.223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在对人格功能水平量表-简易表格2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0)在不同人群和文化中的内部结构和一致性进行系统评价和荟萃分析。通过系统研究确定的研究受到资格标准的约束,产生30个纳入研究和110个效应量。将研究特征制成表格,对其方法学质量进行评估,并使用随机效应荟萃分析对研究结果进行综合。研究结果总体上支持LPFS-BF 2.0的内部结构,并表明总量表的内部一致性良好。调节分析表明,内部一致性在指数类型、样本类型、性别、年龄、国家和语言之间的差异极小。总的来说,研究结果表明,LPFS-BF 2.0评估的是一个连贯的、内部一致的结构,这使它成为评估不同人群人格功能的潜在有用工具。未来的研究应进一步探讨互测者的信度、重测稳定性以及与基于访谈的人格障碍严重程度的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Internal Structure and Consistency of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The present systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess the internal structure and consistency of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0) across different populations and cultures. Studies identified through systematic research were subjected to eligibility criteria, resulting in 30 included studies and 110 effect sizes. Study characteristics were tabulated, their methodological quality was assessed, and findings were synthesized using a random-effects meta-analysis. Findings overall supported the internal structure of the LPFS-BF 2.0 and indicated sound internal consistency for the total scale. Moderator analyses indicated that internal consistency differed minimally by index type, sample type, gender, age, country, and language. The findings overall suggest that the LPFS-BF 2.0 assesses a coherent and internally consistent construct, making it a potentially useful tool for evaluating personality functioning across diverse populations. Future investigations should further explore interrater reliability, test-retest stability, and alignment with interview-based personality disorder severity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Disorders has long been the only forum devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant personality disorders. The journal fosters dialogue among researchers and practitioners working from a variety of orientations and approaches. Its international impact is well established, with subscribers in over 30 countries. This multidisciplinary journal regularly features: - Research on normal and pathological personality and development - New methodologies for assessing personality - Etiologies and clinical classifications for personality disorders - Epidemiological studies and outcomes research on diagnostic criteria - Treatment techniques and innovations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信