沙特阿拉伯流感样疾病趋势分析:统计和深度学习技术的比较研究。

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fathelrhman El Guma
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯流感样疾病趋势分析:统计和深度学习技术的比较研究。","authors":"Fathelrhman El Guma","doi":"10.24171/j.phrp.2025.0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To develop and evaluate forecasting models using the Holt-Winters statistical approach and the long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning method for weekly seasonal influenza-like illness (ILI) incidences in Saudi Arabia. The study compares model performance and assesses the predictive value added by incorporating region-specific exogenous variables within Middle Eastern epidemiological modeling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study compared the performance of Holt-Winters and LSTM models in forecasting weekly ILI cases in Saudi Arabia, using data collected from 2017 to 2022. Time series analysis integrated exogenous variables including climatic conditions and population mobility trends. The Holt-Winters model employed both additive and multiplicative seasonal components. Model performance was evaluated using root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error, and R2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best-performing model, LSTM with exogenous variables, achieved an RMSE of 28.55, mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.14, R2 of 0.96, and percent bias (PBIAS) of +2.1%, indicating negligible systematic error. The LSTM model without exogenous variables demonstrated slightly lower accuracy (RMSE of 34.07, MAE of 0.18, R2 of 0.93, PBIAS of +5.8%), indicating strong predictive capability but less precision in determining peak ILI cases. The Holt-Winters model effectively captured seasonal and long-term trends, but showed a moderate performance with an RMSE of 82.57, MAE of 0.38, R2 of 0.58, and a high PBIAS of +14.2%, revealing significant unexplained variability during periods of high incidence fluctuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the respective strengths and limitations of statistical and machine learning approaches for ILI forecasting.</p>","PeriodicalId":38949,"journal":{"name":"Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":"270-284"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12245528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of influenza-like illness trends in Saudi Arabia: a comparative study of statistical and deep learning techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Fathelrhman El Guma\",\"doi\":\"10.24171/j.phrp.2025.0080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To develop and evaluate forecasting models using the Holt-Winters statistical approach and the long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning method for weekly seasonal influenza-like illness (ILI) incidences in Saudi Arabia. The study compares model performance and assesses the predictive value added by incorporating region-specific exogenous variables within Middle Eastern epidemiological modeling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study compared the performance of Holt-Winters and LSTM models in forecasting weekly ILI cases in Saudi Arabia, using data collected from 2017 to 2022. Time series analysis integrated exogenous variables including climatic conditions and population mobility trends. The Holt-Winters model employed both additive and multiplicative seasonal components. Model performance was evaluated using root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error, and R2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best-performing model, LSTM with exogenous variables, achieved an RMSE of 28.55, mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.14, R2 of 0.96, and percent bias (PBIAS) of +2.1%, indicating negligible systematic error. The LSTM model without exogenous variables demonstrated slightly lower accuracy (RMSE of 34.07, MAE of 0.18, R2 of 0.93, PBIAS of +5.8%), indicating strong predictive capability but less precision in determining peak ILI cases. The Holt-Winters model effectively captured seasonal and long-term trends, but showed a moderate performance with an RMSE of 82.57, MAE of 0.38, R2 of 0.58, and a high PBIAS of +14.2%, revealing significant unexplained variability during periods of high incidence fluctuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the respective strengths and limitations of statistical and machine learning approaches for ILI forecasting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"270-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12245528/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2025.0080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2025.0080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用霍尔特-温特斯统计方法和长短期记忆(LSTM)深度学习方法开发并评估沙特阿拉伯每周季节性流感样疾病(ILI)发病率的预测模型。该研究比较了模型的性能,并通过在中东流行病学模型中纳入特定区域的外生变量来评估预测价值。方法:本研究比较了Holt-Winters模型和LSTM模型在预测沙特阿拉伯每周ILI病例方面的表现,使用2017年至2022年收集的数据。时间序列分析综合了外生变量,包括气候条件和人口流动趋势。霍尔特-温特斯模型采用了加性和乘性两种季节分量。使用均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对百分比误差和R2评估模型性能。结果:表现最好的外生变量LSTM模型RMSE为28.55,平均绝对误差(MAE)为0.14,R2为0.96,百分比偏差(PBIAS)为+2.1%,系统误差可以忽略不计。无外源变量的LSTM模型准确率略低(RMSE为34.07,MAE为0.18,R2为0.93,PBIAS为+5.8%),表明预测能力较强,但对ILI高峰病例的预测精度较低。霍尔特-温特模型有效地捕获了季节性和长期趋势,但表现不佳,RMSE为82.57,MAE为0.38,R2为0.58,PBIAS为+14.2%,表明在发病率高波动期间存在显著的无法解释的变异。结论:本研究突出了统计方法和机器学习方法在ILI预测中的各自优势和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Analysis of influenza-like illness trends in Saudi Arabia: a comparative study of statistical and deep learning techniques.

Analysis of influenza-like illness trends in Saudi Arabia: a comparative study of statistical and deep learning techniques.

Analysis of influenza-like illness trends in Saudi Arabia: a comparative study of statistical and deep learning techniques.

Analysis of influenza-like illness trends in Saudi Arabia: a comparative study of statistical and deep learning techniques.

Background: To develop and evaluate forecasting models using the Holt-Winters statistical approach and the long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning method for weekly seasonal influenza-like illness (ILI) incidences in Saudi Arabia. The study compares model performance and assesses the predictive value added by incorporating region-specific exogenous variables within Middle Eastern epidemiological modeling.

Methods: This study compared the performance of Holt-Winters and LSTM models in forecasting weekly ILI cases in Saudi Arabia, using data collected from 2017 to 2022. Time series analysis integrated exogenous variables including climatic conditions and population mobility trends. The Holt-Winters model employed both additive and multiplicative seasonal components. Model performance was evaluated using root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error, and R2.

Results: The best-performing model, LSTM with exogenous variables, achieved an RMSE of 28.55, mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.14, R2 of 0.96, and percent bias (PBIAS) of +2.1%, indicating negligible systematic error. The LSTM model without exogenous variables demonstrated slightly lower accuracy (RMSE of 34.07, MAE of 0.18, R2 of 0.93, PBIAS of +5.8%), indicating strong predictive capability but less precision in determining peak ILI cases. The Holt-Winters model effectively captured seasonal and long-term trends, but showed a moderate performance with an RMSE of 82.57, MAE of 0.38, R2 of 0.58, and a high PBIAS of +14.2%, revealing significant unexplained variability during periods of high incidence fluctuation.

Conclusion: This study highlights the respective strengths and limitations of statistical and machine learning approaches for ILI forecasting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives
Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信