{"title":"肥胖患者食管裂孔大小与反流性食管炎和I型食管裂孔疝的关系","authors":"Zhong Qi, Xiao-Chen Shi, Wen-Mao Yan, Ri-Xing Bai","doi":"10.4329/wjr.v17.i5.106333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chinese surgeons often rely on intraoperative exploration of the esophageal hiatus to determine the need for concurrent type I hiatal hernia (HH) repair during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. However, no standardized criteria for the esophageal hiatus size or indications for exploration exist in China.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate normal anatomical parameter ranges of the esophageal hiatus in patients with obesity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 158 patients, aged 20-49 years, was analyzed from January 2020 to June 2024. The patients were classified into the no reflux esophagitis (RE) no HH group (HHG), RE group, and type I HHG. The transverse and sagittal diameters and cross-sectional area of the esophageal hiatus were measured using multiplanar reconstruction of the computed tomography images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Body mass index was positively correlated with area and transverse and sagittal diameters of the esophageal hiatus (<i>r</i> = 0.72, 0.69, and 0.54, respectively; <i>P</i> < 0.01). In the no RE no HHG and RE group, the esophageal hiatus size in the subgroup with obesity was greater than that in the non-obesity subgroup (area: 326.15 ± 78 mm<sup>2</sup> <i>vs</i> 208.12 ± 64.44 mm<sup>2</sup>, transverse diameters: 15.97 ± 2.06 mm <i>vs</i> 13.37 ± 1.99 mm, sagittal diameters: 15.7 ± 2.08 mm <i>vs</i> 11.73 ± 2.08 mm; <i>P</i> < 0.01). Patients with obesity showed no significant differences in esophageal hiatus size with or without RE or HH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The esophageal hiatus size increased with body mass index and was larger in patients with obesity than in those without obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":23819,"journal":{"name":"World journal of radiology","volume":"17 5","pages":"106333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of esophageal hiatus size with reflux esophagitis and type I hiatal hernia in patients with obesity.\",\"authors\":\"Zhong Qi, Xiao-Chen Shi, Wen-Mao Yan, Ri-Xing Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.4329/wjr.v17.i5.106333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chinese surgeons often rely on intraoperative exploration of the esophageal hiatus to determine the need for concurrent type I hiatal hernia (HH) repair during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. However, no standardized criteria for the esophageal hiatus size or indications for exploration exist in China.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate normal anatomical parameter ranges of the esophageal hiatus in patients with obesity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 158 patients, aged 20-49 years, was analyzed from January 2020 to June 2024. The patients were classified into the no reflux esophagitis (RE) no HH group (HHG), RE group, and type I HHG. The transverse and sagittal diameters and cross-sectional area of the esophageal hiatus were measured using multiplanar reconstruction of the computed tomography images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Body mass index was positively correlated with area and transverse and sagittal diameters of the esophageal hiatus (<i>r</i> = 0.72, 0.69, and 0.54, respectively; <i>P</i> < 0.01). In the no RE no HHG and RE group, the esophageal hiatus size in the subgroup with obesity was greater than that in the non-obesity subgroup (area: 326.15 ± 78 mm<sup>2</sup> <i>vs</i> 208.12 ± 64.44 mm<sup>2</sup>, transverse diameters: 15.97 ± 2.06 mm <i>vs</i> 13.37 ± 1.99 mm, sagittal diameters: 15.7 ± 2.08 mm <i>vs</i> 11.73 ± 2.08 mm; <i>P</i> < 0.01). Patients with obesity showed no significant differences in esophageal hiatus size with or without RE or HH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The esophageal hiatus size increased with body mass index and was larger in patients with obesity than in those without obesity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of radiology\",\"volume\":\"17 5\",\"pages\":\"106333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149973/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i5.106333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i5.106333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:中国外科医生通常依靠术中探查食管裂孔来确定在腹腔镜袖胃切除术中是否需要同时修复I型裂孔疝(HH)。然而,对于食管裂孔的大小和探查适应症,中国尚无标准化的标准。目的:探讨肥胖患者食管裂孔的正常解剖参数范围。方法:对2020年1月至2024年6月收治的158例患者进行分析,年龄20 ~ 49岁。将患者分为无反流性食管炎(RE)、无HH组(HHG)、RE组和I型HHG。利用计算机断层图像的多平面重建测量食管裂孔的横、矢状直径和横截面积。结果:体重指数与食管裂孔面积、横、矢状直径呈正相关(r分别为0.72、0.69、0.54);P < 0.01)。在无RE、无HHG和RE组中,肥胖亚组食管裂孔大小大于非肥胖亚组(面积:326.15±78 mm2 vs 208.12±64.44 mm2,横径:15.97±2.06 mm vs 13.37±1.99 mm,矢状径:15.7±2.08 mm vs 11.73±2.08 mm;P < 0.01)。肥胖患者食管裂孔大小在有无RE或HH的情况下无显著差异。结论:食管裂孔大小随体重指数的增加而增大,肥胖患者的食管裂孔大小大于非肥胖患者。
Association of esophageal hiatus size with reflux esophagitis and type I hiatal hernia in patients with obesity.
Background: Chinese surgeons often rely on intraoperative exploration of the esophageal hiatus to determine the need for concurrent type I hiatal hernia (HH) repair during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. However, no standardized criteria for the esophageal hiatus size or indications for exploration exist in China.
Aim: To investigate normal anatomical parameter ranges of the esophageal hiatus in patients with obesity.
Methods: A total of 158 patients, aged 20-49 years, was analyzed from January 2020 to June 2024. The patients were classified into the no reflux esophagitis (RE) no HH group (HHG), RE group, and type I HHG. The transverse and sagittal diameters and cross-sectional area of the esophageal hiatus were measured using multiplanar reconstruction of the computed tomography images.
Results: Body mass index was positively correlated with area and transverse and sagittal diameters of the esophageal hiatus (r = 0.72, 0.69, and 0.54, respectively; P < 0.01). In the no RE no HHG and RE group, the esophageal hiatus size in the subgroup with obesity was greater than that in the non-obesity subgroup (area: 326.15 ± 78 mm2vs 208.12 ± 64.44 mm2, transverse diameters: 15.97 ± 2.06 mm vs 13.37 ± 1.99 mm, sagittal diameters: 15.7 ± 2.08 mm vs 11.73 ± 2.08 mm; P < 0.01). Patients with obesity showed no significant differences in esophageal hiatus size with or without RE or HH.
Conclusion: The esophageal hiatus size increased with body mass index and was larger in patients with obesity than in those without obesity.