{"title":"加强缝合预防直肠癌术后吻合口漏的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Zi-Xuan Zhuang, Yang Zhang, Xu-Yang Yang, Zi-Qiang Wang, Xiang-Bing Deng, Ming-Ming Zhang","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a challenging complication following rectal cancer surgery, often leading to increased morbidity and healthcare costs. The use of reinforcement sutures is expected to reduce the rate of AL, their preventive effects are controversial.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the efficacy of reinforcing sutures in preventing AL in rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of major medical databases was conducted to identify studies up to June 2024. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were assessed; the primary outcome assessed was the incidence of AL. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using fixed-effect or random-effect models under heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis incorporated 20 studies involving 3726 patients. Pooled results demonstrated a statistically significant reduction AL incidence in the reinforced suture group (OR: 0.26, 95%CI: 0.19-0.35, <i>P</i> < 0.001) than the unreinforced suture group. The reinforced suture group also exhibited a shorter hospital stay (MD: -1.17, 95%CI: -1.78 to -0.57, <i>P</i> < 0.001), earlier anal exhaust (MD: -0.13, 95%CI: -0.22 to -0.05, <i>P</i> = 0.002), longer operative time (MD: 15.25, 95%CI: 10.71-19.80, <i>P</i> < 0.001), lower infection rate (OR: 0.54, 95%CI: 0.29-1.00, <i>P</i> = 0.05) and lower reoperation rate (OR: 0.19, 95%CI: 0.08-0.45, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results substantiate the clinical value of anastomotic reinforcement sutures in reducing AL incidence post-rectal cancer surgery. Nevertheless, these conclusions warrant verification through additional high-quality randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 5","pages":"103758"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of reinforcing sutures in preventing anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and metaanalysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zi-Xuan Zhuang, Yang Zhang, Xu-Yang Yang, Zi-Qiang Wang, Xiang-Bing Deng, Ming-Ming Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a challenging complication following rectal cancer surgery, often leading to increased morbidity and healthcare costs. The use of reinforcement sutures is expected to reduce the rate of AL, their preventive effects are controversial.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the efficacy of reinforcing sutures in preventing AL in rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of major medical databases was conducted to identify studies up to June 2024. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were assessed; the primary outcome assessed was the incidence of AL. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using fixed-effect or random-effect models under heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis incorporated 20 studies involving 3726 patients. Pooled results demonstrated a statistically significant reduction AL incidence in the reinforced suture group (OR: 0.26, 95%CI: 0.19-0.35, <i>P</i> < 0.001) than the unreinforced suture group. The reinforced suture group also exhibited a shorter hospital stay (MD: -1.17, 95%CI: -1.78 to -0.57, <i>P</i> < 0.001), earlier anal exhaust (MD: -0.13, 95%CI: -0.22 to -0.05, <i>P</i> = 0.002), longer operative time (MD: 15.25, 95%CI: 10.71-19.80, <i>P</i> < 0.001), lower infection rate (OR: 0.54, 95%CI: 0.29-1.00, <i>P</i> = 0.05) and lower reoperation rate (OR: 0.19, 95%CI: 0.08-0.45, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results substantiate the clinical value of anastomotic reinforcement sutures in reducing AL incidence post-rectal cancer surgery. Nevertheless, these conclusions warrant verification through additional high-quality randomized controlled trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 5\",\"pages\":\"103758\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149912/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103758\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:吻合口瘘(AL)是直肠癌手术后的一个具有挑战性的并发症,经常导致发病率和医疗费用的增加。使用加固缝线有望降低AL发生率,但其预防效果存在争议。目的:探讨加固缝线预防直肠癌AL的效果。方法:系统检索截至2024年6月的主要医学数据库。评估术中及术后结果;评估的主要结局是AL的发生率。使用异质性下的固定效应或随机效应模型计算具有95%置信区间(CI)的合并优势比(ORs)和平均差异(MDs)。结果:本荟萃分析纳入了20项研究,涉及3726例患者。综合结果显示,与未加强缝合组相比,加强缝合组AL发生率降低具有统计学意义(OR: 0.26, 95%CI: 0.19-0.35, P < 0.001)。强化缝合组住院时间较短(MD: -1.17, 95%CI: -1.78 ~ -0.57, P < 0.001),肛门排气时间较早(MD: -0.13, 95%CI: -0.22 ~ -0.05, P = 0.002),手术时间较长(MD: 15.25, 95%CI: 10.71 ~ 19.80, P < 0.001),感染率较低(OR: 0.54, 95%CI: 0.29 ~ 1.00, P = 0.05),再手术率较低(OR: 0.19, 95%CI: 0.08 ~ 0.45, P < 0.001)。结论:吻合口加固缝合线在降低直肠癌术后AL发生率中的临床应用价值。然而,这些结论值得通过额外的高质量随机对照试验来验证。
Efficacy of reinforcing sutures in preventing anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and metaanalysis.
Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a challenging complication following rectal cancer surgery, often leading to increased morbidity and healthcare costs. The use of reinforcement sutures is expected to reduce the rate of AL, their preventive effects are controversial.
Aim: To determine the efficacy of reinforcing sutures in preventing AL in rectal cancer.
Methods: A systematic search of major medical databases was conducted to identify studies up to June 2024. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were assessed; the primary outcome assessed was the incidence of AL. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using fixed-effect or random-effect models under heterogeneity.
Results: This meta-analysis incorporated 20 studies involving 3726 patients. Pooled results demonstrated a statistically significant reduction AL incidence in the reinforced suture group (OR: 0.26, 95%CI: 0.19-0.35, P < 0.001) than the unreinforced suture group. The reinforced suture group also exhibited a shorter hospital stay (MD: -1.17, 95%CI: -1.78 to -0.57, P < 0.001), earlier anal exhaust (MD: -0.13, 95%CI: -0.22 to -0.05, P = 0.002), longer operative time (MD: 15.25, 95%CI: 10.71-19.80, P < 0.001), lower infection rate (OR: 0.54, 95%CI: 0.29-1.00, P = 0.05) and lower reoperation rate (OR: 0.19, 95%CI: 0.08-0.45, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: The results substantiate the clinical value of anastomotic reinforcement sutures in reducing AL incidence post-rectal cancer surgery. Nevertheless, these conclusions warrant verification through additional high-quality randomized controlled trials.